Subject pretty much says it all. I want the 5.2 without the xen kernel. I've grabbed bits from 2 different mirrors and they all appear to have xen on them. It would be very nice if someone could throw some text into the mirrors file to differentiate the two "versions".. Oh yeah, I need the x86_64 .iso. Thanks Sam
Sam Drinkard wrote:> Subject pretty much says it all. I want the 5.2 without the xen kernel. > I've grabbed bits from 2 different mirrors and they all appear to have > xen on them. It would be very nice if someone could throw some text > into the mirrors file to differentiate the two "versions".. Oh yeah, I > need the x86_64 .iso.I'm not sure i've got the point ... you have the normal kernel and the choice to install xen if you want .. it's up to you : nobody forces you to install it. The same rule applies to Gnome/KDE/etc ;-) -- - Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin at arrfab.net> "Internet network currently down, TCP/IP packets delivered now by UPS/Fedex ..."
Sam Drinkard ?rta:> Subject pretty much says it all. I want the 5.2 without the xen kernel. > I've grabbed bits from 2 different mirrors and they all appear to have > xen on them. It would be very nice if someone could throw some text > into the mirrors file to differentiate the two "versions".. Oh yeah, I > need the x86_64 .iso. > Thanksyou just dont install xen, thats all no magic! t
Sam Drinkard wrote:> Subject pretty much says it all. I want the 5.2 without the xen kernel. > I've grabbed bits from 2 different mirrors and they all appear to have > xen on them. It would be very nice if someone could throw some text > into the mirrors file to differentiate the two "versions".. Oh yeah, I > need the x86_64 .iso.Do not install "Virtualization" and you won't have xen. There are no different ISOs for "with xen" and "without xen". Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081121/aabd92f5/attachment-0003.sig>
Ralph Angenendt wrote:> Do not install "Virtualization" and you won't > have xen. There are no > different ISOs for "with xen" and "without > xen". >This means that the OP did not even bother checking the responses to his question. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/068124.html even looking at the recent kernel updates one can see for themselves :- x86_64: kernel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm kernel-doc-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.noarch.rpm kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm Regards, Vandaman.
Sam, please don't abandon threads you initiated yourself about the same topic, this is noob behavior. You should know better by now. You waste other people's time as they cannot know all content of all threads. Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com