Hey folks,
I'm following up after a meeting with Rich, Karsten, and others, where
we discussed next steps towards setting up a mirror of
https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/red-hat-enterprise-linux-documentation/rhel-8-docs
at
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/docs
Interesting question came up - how should the repo be named? Considering
that all "redhat", "centos stream", and "docs" are
already in the URL, we
briefly discussed the name before Karsten suggested bringing the question
here.
Among the proposals were:
"modular-docs" - might be confusing with binary modules in the Stream
"enterprise-upstream" - could make sense from the perspective of RHEL,
maybe not so much from the community perspective
"linux" - this is how RHEL is called outside the context of the RH
product
offering but is it widespread enough and unambiguous enough?
We also need to consider that we shall start by setting up a one-way mirror
from RHEL to Stream and later switch the setup to be fully upstream-first.
We also discussed a README file for the mirrored content - I created the
initial version here for reviews and suggestions:
https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/red-hat-enterprise-linux-documentation/rhel-8-docs/-/blob/master/centos/README.adoc
Hope that helps,
Tomas
--
Tom?? ?apek
Senior Documentation Program Manager
Customer Content Services
irc: tcapek
Too brief? Here's why: the email charter
<https://medium.com/virtual-teams-for-systemic-change/the-email-charter-an-idea-worth-spreading-688b8940f892>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20210917/97fe8855/attachment-0005.html>
On Fri, 2021-09-17 at 14:19 +0200, Tomas Capek wrote:> Hey folks, > > ??? I'm following up after a meeting with Rich, Karsten, and others, > where we discussed next steps towards setting up a mirror of > > https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/red-hat-enterprise-linux-documentation/rhel-8-docs > > at > > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/docs > > Interesting question came up - how should the repo be named? > Considering that all "redhat", "centos stream", and "docs" are > already in the URL, we briefly discussed the name before Karsten > suggested bringing the question here. > > Among the proposals were: > > "modular-docs" - might be confusing with binary modules in the Stream > "enterprise-upstream" - could make sense from the perspective of > RHEL, maybe not so much from the community perspective > "linux" - this is how RHEL is called outside the context of the RH > product offering but is it widespread enough and unambiguous enough?I can't access the internal RH gitlab, but assuming these are the user- facing RHEL docs, maybe "enterprise-docs" ? I'd definitely recommend *not* using "modular-docs", that will definitely be confusing, and "linux" is probably too generic in this context.> We also need to consider that we shall start by setting up a one-way > mirror from RHEL to Stream and later switch the setup to be fully > upstream-first.I don't suppose we could rig this up to be upstream first from the beginning and make the centos-stream repo the source of truth here? Cheers Davide