CentOS docs - Jan 2015 - http://www.centos.org/ Help menu anchor

On http://www.centos.org/, the Help in the navbar is described by the anchor

<a
href="http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation?action=show&amp;redirect=GettingHelp
<view-source:http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation?action=show&redirect=GettingHelp>">Help</a>

Why does it contain ?action=show&amp;redirect=GettingHelp ? It seems
to me Documentation would be sufficient.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20150102/744987d0/attachment-0002.html>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/02/2015 01:27 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
> On http://www.centos.org/, the Help in the navbar is described by
> the anchor
> 
> <a
>
href="http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation?action=show&amp;redirect=GettingHelp
>
> 
<view-source:http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation?action=show&redirect=GettingHelp>">Help</a>
> 
> Why does it contain ?action=show&amp;redirect=GettingHelp ? It
> seems to me Documentation would be sufficient.
That is a bit weird, I'd presumed it was a link to GettingHelp and
then got redirected, rather than containing the redirect. I suspect we
missed that when the website content was created, likely just copying
and pasting in the URL without thinking further.

It's actually curious to me that it's /not/ GettingHelp, as that is a
category that includes Documentation (but not the reverse), and seems
to describe the page content better. Anyone here know the reason for
the rename/redirect?

It's an easy fix, I've attached a patch for Jim or someone to approve
and push.

- - Karsten
- -- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade        .^\          CentOS Doer of Stuff
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org    \  http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC)  \v'             gpg: AD0E0C41ter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlSp0FEACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEF3dACfXxdPha3bcPT4WWJVxaUZb8jI
rsYAnjWpzrpDqT/JjtNKioTxG9mFb5+i
=xrP0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Making-direct-URL-rather-than-using-MoinMoin-redirec.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 695 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20150104/b2cd81a2/attachment-0002.bin>

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 01/02/2015 01:27 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
>> On http://www.centos.org/, the Help in the navbar is described by
>> the anchor
>>
>> <a
>>
href="http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation?action=show&amp;redirect=GettingHelp
>>
>>
>
<view-source:http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation?action=show&redirect=GettingHelp>">Help</a>
>>
>> Why does it contain ?action=show&amp;redirect=GettingHelp ? It
>> seems to me Documentation would be sufficient.
>
> That is a bit weird, I'd presumed it was a link to GettingHelp and
> then got redirected, rather than containing the redirect. I suspect we
> missed that when the website content was created, likely just copying
> and pasting in the URL without thinking further.
>
> It's actually curious to me that it's /not/ GettingHelp, as that is
a
> category that includes Documentation (but not the reverse), and seems
> to describe the page content better. Anyone here know the reason for
> the rename/redirect?
>
> It's an easy fix, I've attached a patch for Jim or someone to
approve
> and push.
>
> - - Karsten
I was wondering, should I be filling a bug report for these typos?