thr3ads.net - Btrfs devel - [PATCH 0/4 v2][RFC] apply rwlock for extent state [Jun 2012]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Liu Bo

2012-Jun-13 10:19 UTC

[PATCH 0/4 v2][RFC] apply rwlock for extent state

This patchset is against one of project ideas, RBtree lock contention:
"Btrfs uses a number of rbtrees to index in-memory data structures.
Some of these are dominated by reads, and the lock contention from searching
them is showing up in profiles.  We need to look into an RCU and sequence
counter combination to allow lockless reads."

The goal is to use RCU, but we take it as a long term one, and instead we use
rwlock until we find a mature rcu structure for lockless read.

So what we need to do is to make the code RCU friendly, and the idea mainly
comes from Chris Mason:
Quoted:
"I think the extent_state code can be much more RCU friendly if we separate
the operations on the tree from operations on the individual state.
In general, we can gain a lot of performance if we are able to reduce
the write locks taken at endio time.  Especially for reads, these are
critical."

The patchset is also available in:
	git://github.com/liubogithub/btrfs-work.git rwlock-for-extent-state



I''ve run through xfstests, and no bugs jump out by then.

I made a simple test to show the difference on my box:
$ cat 6_FIO/fio-4thread-4M-sync-read
[global]
group_reporting
thread
numjobs=4
bs=4M
rw=read
sync=0
ioengine=sync
directory=/mnt/btrfs/

[READ]
filename=foobar
size=4000M

*results:*
                          w/o patch     w patch
READ bandwidth(aggrb)      849MB/s      971MB/s

MORE TESTS ARE WELCOME!

v1->v2: drop changes on invalidatepage() and rebase to the latest btrfs
upstream.

Liu Bo (4):
  Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum
  Btrfs: merge adjacent states as much as possible
  Btrfs: use large extent range for read and its endio
  Btrfs: apply rwlock for extent state

 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |  712 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.h |    5 +-
 fs/btrfs/inode.c     |    7 +-
 3 files changed, 568 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Liu Bo

2012-Jun-13 10:19 UTC

head link

[PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

We used to issue a checksum to an extent state of 4K range for read endio,
but now we want to use larger range for performance optimization, so instead we
create a radix tree for checksum, where an item stands for checksum of 4K data.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |   84 ++++++++++++--------------------------------------
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.h |    2 +
 fs/btrfs/inode.c     |    7 +---
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 2c8f7b2..2923ede 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -117,10 +117,12 @@ void extent_io_tree_init(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 {
 	tree->state = RB_ROOT;
 	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&tree->buffer, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&tree->csum, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	tree->ops = NULL;
 	tree->dirty_bytes = 0;
 	spin_lock_init(&tree->lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&tree->buffer_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&tree->csum_lock);
 	tree->mapping = mapping;
 }
 
@@ -703,15 +705,6 @@ static void cache_state(struct extent_state *state,
 	}
 }
 
-static void uncache_state(struct extent_state **cached_ptr)
-{
-	if (cached_ptr && (*cached_ptr)) {
-		struct extent_state *state = *cached_ptr;
-		*cached_ptr = NULL;
-		free_extent_state(state);
-	}
-}
-
 /*
  * set some bits on a range in the tree.  This may require allocations or
  * sleeping, so the gfp mask is used to indicate what is allowed.
@@ -1666,56 +1659,32 @@ out:
  */
 int set_state_private(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 private)
 {
-	struct rb_node *node;
-	struct extent_state *state;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
-	/*
-	 * this search will find all the extents that end after
-	 * our range starts.
-	 */
-	node = tree_search(tree, start);
-	if (!node) {
-		ret = -ENOENT;
-		goto out;
-	}
-	state = rb_entry(node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
-	if (state->start != start) {
-		ret = -ENOENT;
-		goto out;
-	}
-	state->private = private;
-out:
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	spin_lock(&tree->csum_lock);
+	ret = radix_tree_insert(&tree->csum, (unsigned long)start,
+			       (void *)((unsigned long)private << 1));
+	BUG_ON(ret);
+	spin_unlock(&tree->csum_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 int get_state_private(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 *private)
 {
-	struct rb_node *node;
-	struct extent_state *state;
-	int ret = 0;
+	void **slot = NULL;
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
-	/*
-	 * this search will find all the extents that end after
-	 * our range starts.
-	 */
-	node = tree_search(tree, start);
-	if (!node) {
-		ret = -ENOENT;
-		goto out;
-	}
-	state = rb_entry(node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
-	if (state->start != start) {
-		ret = -ENOENT;
-		goto out;
+	spin_lock(&tree->csum_lock);
+	slot = radix_tree_lookup_slot(&tree->csum, (unsigned long)start);
+	if (!slot) {
+		spin_unlock(&tree->csum_lock);
+		return -ENOENT;
 	}
-	*private = state->private;
-out:
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
-	return ret;
+	*private = (u64)(*slot) >> 1;
+
+	radix_tree_delete(&tree->csum, (unsigned long)start);
+	spin_unlock(&tree->csum_lock);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2294,7 +2263,6 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int
err)
 	do {
 		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
 		struct extent_state *cached = NULL;
-		struct extent_state *state;
 
 		pr_debug("end_bio_extent_readpage: bi_vcnt=%d, idx=%d, err=%d, "
 			 "mirror=%ld\n", bio->bi_vcnt, bio->bi_idx, err,
@@ -2313,21 +2281,10 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int
err)
 		if (++bvec <= bvec_end)
 			prefetchw(&bvec->bv_page->flags);
 
-		spin_lock(&tree->lock);
-		state = find_first_extent_bit_state(tree, start, EXTENT_LOCKED);
-		if (state && state->start == start) {
-			/*
-			 * take a reference on the state, unlock will drop
-			 * the ref
-			 */
-			cache_state(state, &cached);
-		}
-		spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
-
 		mirror = (int)(unsigned long)bio->bi_bdev;
 		if (uptodate && tree->ops &&
tree->ops->readpage_end_io_hook) {
 			ret = tree->ops->readpage_end_io_hook(page, start, end,
-							      state, mirror);
+							      NULL, mirror);
 			if (ret) {
 				/* no IO indicated but software detected errors
 				 * in the block, either checksum errors or
@@ -2369,7 +2326,6 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int
err)
 					test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
 				if (err)
 					uptodate = 0;
-				uncache_state(&cached);
 				continue;
 			}
 		}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
index 25900af..c896962 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
@@ -96,11 +96,13 @@ struct extent_io_ops {
 struct extent_io_tree {
 	struct rb_root state;
 	struct radix_tree_root buffer;
+	struct radix_tree_root csum;
 	struct address_space *mapping;
 	u64 dirty_bytes;
 	int track_uptodate;
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	spinlock_t buffer_lock;
+	spinlock_t csum_lock;
 	struct extent_io_ops *ops;
 };
 
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index f6ab6f5..da0da44 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2008,12 +2008,7 @@ static int btrfs_readpage_end_io_hook(struct page *page,
u64 start, u64 end,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (state && state->start == start) {
-		private = state->private;
-		ret = 0;
-	} else {
-		ret = get_state_private(io_tree, start, &private);
-	}
+	ret = get_state_private(io_tree, start, &private);
 	kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
 	if (ret)
 		goto zeroit;
-- 
1.6.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Liu Bo

2012-Jun-13 10:19 UTC

head link

[PATCH 2/4] Btrfs: merge adjacent states as much as possible

In order to reduce write locks, we do merge_state as much as much as possible.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 2923ede..081fe13 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -276,29 +276,36 @@ static void merge_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 	if (state->state & (EXTENT_IOBITS | EXTENT_BOUNDARY))
 		return;
 
-	other_node = rb_prev(&state->rb_node);
-	if (other_node) {
+	while (1) {
+		other_node = rb_prev(&state->rb_node);
+		if (!other_node)
+			break;
 		other = rb_entry(other_node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
-		if (other->end == state->start - 1 &&
-		    other->state == state->state) {
-			merge_cb(tree, state, other);
-			state->start = other->start;
-			other->tree = NULL;
-			rb_erase(&other->rb_node, &tree->state);
-			free_extent_state(other);
-		}
+		if (other->end != state->start - 1 ||
+		    other->state != state->state)
+			break;
+
+		merge_cb(tree, state, other);
+		state->start = other->start;
+		other->tree = NULL;
+		rb_erase(&other->rb_node, &tree->state);
+		free_extent_state(other);
 	}
-	other_node = rb_next(&state->rb_node);
-	if (other_node) {
+
+	while (1) {
+		other_node = rb_next(&state->rb_node);
+		if (!other_node)
+			break;
 		other = rb_entry(other_node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
-		if (other->start == state->end + 1 &&
-		    other->state == state->state) {
-			merge_cb(tree, state, other);
-			state->end = other->end;
-			other->tree = NULL;
-			rb_erase(&other->rb_node, &tree->state);
-			free_extent_state(other);
-		}
+		if (other->start != state->end + 1 ||
+		    other->state != state->state)
+			break;
+
+		merge_cb(tree, state, other);
+		state->end = other->end;
+		other->tree = NULL;
+		rb_erase(&other->rb_node, &tree->state);
+		free_extent_state(other);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.6.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Liu Bo

2012-Jun-13 10:19 UTC

head link

[PATCH 3/4] Btrfs: use large extent range for read and its endio

we use larger extent state range for both readpages and read endio, so that
we can lock or unlock less and avoid most of split ops, then we''ll
reduce write
locks taken at endio time.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |  201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 081fe13..bb66e3c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -2258,18 +2258,26 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int
err)
 	struct bio_vec *bvec_end = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt - 1;
 	struct bio_vec *bvec = bio->bi_io_vec;
 	struct extent_io_tree *tree;
+	struct extent_state *cached = NULL;
 	u64 start;
 	u64 end;
 	int whole_page;
 	int mirror;
 	int ret;
+	u64 up_start, up_end, un_start, un_end;
+	int up_first, un_first;
+	int for_uptodate[bio->bi_vcnt];
+	int i = 0;
+
+	up_start = un_start = (u64)-1;
+	up_end = un_end = 0;
+	up_first = un_first = 1;
 
 	if (err)
 		uptodate = 0;
 
 	do {
 		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
-		struct extent_state *cached = NULL;
 
 		pr_debug("end_bio_extent_readpage: bi_vcnt=%d, idx=%d, err=%d, "
 			 "mirror=%ld\n", bio->bi_vcnt, bio->bi_idx, err,
@@ -2280,11 +2288,6 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int
err)
 			bvec->bv_offset;
 		end = start + bvec->bv_len - 1;
 
-		if (bvec->bv_offset == 0 && bvec->bv_len == PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
-			whole_page = 1;
-		else
-			whole_page = 0;
-
 		if (++bvec <= bvec_end)
 			prefetchw(&bvec->bv_page->flags);
 
@@ -2337,14 +2340,71 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int
err)
 			}
 		}
 
+		if (uptodate)
+			for_uptodate[i++] = 1;
+		else
+			for_uptodate[i++] = 0;
+
 		if (uptodate && tree->track_uptodate) {
-			set_extent_uptodate(tree, start, end, &cached,
-					    GFP_ATOMIC);
+			if (up_first) {
+				up_start = start;
+				up_end = end;
+				up_first = 0;
+			} else {
+				if (up_start == end + 1) {
+					up_start = start;
+				} else if (up_end == start - 1) {
+					up_end = end;
+				} else {
+					set_extent_uptodate(
+							tree, up_start, up_end,
+							&cached, GFP_ATOMIC);
+					up_start = start;
+					up_end = end;
+				}
+			}
 		}
-		unlock_extent_cached(tree, start, end, &cached, GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+		if (un_first) {
+			un_start = start;
+			un_end = end;
+			un_first = 0;
+		} else {
+			if (un_start == end + 1) {
+				un_start = start;
+			} else if (un_end == start - 1) {
+				un_end = end;
+			} else {
+				unlock_extent_cached(tree, un_start, un_end,
+						     &cached, GFP_ATOMIC);
+				un_start = start;
+				un_end = end;
+			}
+		}
+	} while (bvec <= bvec_end);
+
+	cached = NULL;
+	if (up_start < up_end)
+		set_extent_uptodate(tree, up_start, up_end, &cached,
+				    GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (un_start < un_end)
+		unlock_extent_cached(tree, un_start, un_end, &cached,
+				     GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+	i = 0;
+	bvec = bio->bi_io_vec;
+	do {
+		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
+
+		tree = &BTRFS_I(page->mapping->host)->io_tree;
+
+		if (bvec->bv_offset == 0 && bvec->bv_len == PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
+			whole_page = 1;
+		else
+			whole_page = 0;
 
 		if (whole_page) {
-			if (uptodate) {
+			if (for_uptodate[i++]) {
 				SetPageUptodate(page);
 			} else {
 				ClearPageUptodate(page);
@@ -2352,7 +2412,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int
err)
 			}
 			unlock_page(page);
 		} else {
-			if (uptodate) {
+			if (for_uptodate[i++]) {
 				check_page_uptodate(tree, page);
 			} else {
 				ClearPageUptodate(page);
@@ -2360,6 +2420,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int
err)
 			}
 			check_page_locked(tree, page);
 		}
+		++bvec;
 	} while (bvec <= bvec_end);
 
 	bio_put(bio);
@@ -2520,7 +2581,7 @@ static int __extent_read_full_page(struct extent_io_tree
*tree,
 				   struct page *page,
 				   get_extent_t *get_extent,
 				   struct bio **bio, int mirror_num,
-				   unsigned long *bio_flags)
+				   unsigned long *bio_flags, int range_lock)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
 	u64 start = (u64)page->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
@@ -2554,6 +2615,8 @@ static int __extent_read_full_page(struct extent_io_tree
*tree,
 
 	end = page_end;
 	while (1) {
+		if (range_lock)
+			break;
 		lock_extent(tree, start, end);
 		ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(inode, start);
 		if (!ordered)
@@ -2703,7 +2766,7 @@ int extent_read_full_page(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
struct page *page,
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = __extent_read_full_page(tree, page, get_extent, &bio, mirror_num,
-				      &bio_flags);
+				      &bio_flags, 0);
 	if (bio)
 		ret = submit_one_bio(READ, bio, mirror_num, bio_flags);
 	return ret;
@@ -3497,6 +3560,59 @@ int extent_writepages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+struct page_list {
+	struct page *page;
+	struct list_head list;
+};
+
+static int process_batch_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
+			       struct address_space *mapping,
+			       struct list_head *lock_pages, int *page_cnt,
+			       u64 lock_start, u64 lock_end,
+				get_extent_t get_extent, struct bio **bio,
+				unsigned long *bio_flags)
+{
+	u64 page_start;
+	struct page_list *plist;
+
+	while (1) {
+		struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered = NULL;
+
+		lock_extent(tree, lock_start, lock_end);
+		page_start = lock_start;
+		while (page_start < lock_end) {
+			ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(mapping->host,
+							      page_start);
+			if (ordered) {
+				page_start = ordered->file_offset;
+				break;
+			}
+			page_start += PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
+		}
+		if (!ordered)
+			break;
+		unlock_extent(tree, lock_start, lock_end);
+		btrfs_start_ordered_extent(mapping->host, ordered, 1);
+		btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
+	}
+
+	plist = NULL;
+	while (!list_empty(lock_pages)) {
+		plist = list_entry(lock_pages->prev, struct page_list, list);
+
+		__extent_read_full_page(tree, plist->page, get_extent,
+					bio, 0, bio_flags, 1);
+		page_cache_release(plist->page);
+		list_del(&plist->list);
+		plist->page = NULL;
+		kfree(plist);
+		(*page_cnt)--;
+	}
+
+	WARN_ON((*page_cnt));
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int extent_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 		     struct address_space *mapping,
 		     struct list_head *pages, unsigned nr_pages,
@@ -3505,7 +3621,17 @@ int extent_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 	struct bio *bio = NULL;
 	unsigned page_idx;
 	unsigned long bio_flags = 0;
-
+	u64 page_start;
+	u64 page_end;
+	u64 lock_start = (u64)-1;
+	u64 lock_end = 0;
+	struct page_list *plist;
+	int page_cnt = 0;
+	LIST_HEAD(lock_pages);
+	int first = 1;
+
+	lock_start = (u64)-1;
+	lock_end = 0;
 	for (page_idx = 0; page_idx < nr_pages; page_idx++) {
 		struct page *page = list_entry(pages->prev, struct page, lru);
 
@@ -3513,12 +3639,49 @@ int extent_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 		list_del(&page->lru);
 		if (!add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping,
 					page->index, GFP_NOFS)) {
-			__extent_read_full_page(tree, page, get_extent,
-						&bio, 0, &bio_flags);
+			page_start = (u64)page_offset(page);
+			page_end = page_start + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1;
+
+			if (first) {
+				lock_start = page_start;
+				lock_end = page_end;
+				first = 0;
+			} else {
+				/*
+				 * |--lock range--||--page range--|
+				 * or
+				 * |--page range--||--lock range--|
+				 */
+				if (lock_start != page_end - 1 &&
+				    lock_end != page_start - 1) {
+					process_batch_pages(tree, mapping,
+						&lock_pages, &page_cnt,
+						lock_start, lock_end,
+						get_extent, &bio, &bio_flags);
+
+					lock_start = page_start;
+					lock_end = page_end;
+				} else {
+					lock_start +						 min(lock_start, page_start);
+					lock_end = max(lock_end, page_end);
+				}
+			}
+			plist = kmalloc(sizeof(*plist), GFP_NOFS);
+			BUG_ON(!plist);
+			plist->page = page;
+			list_add(&plist->list, &lock_pages);
+			page_cache_get(page);
+			page_cnt++;
 		}
 		page_cache_release(page);
 	}
+
+	if (!list_empty(&lock_pages))
+		process_batch_pages(tree, mapping, &lock_pages, &page_cnt,
+			lock_start, lock_end, get_extent, &bio, &bio_flags);
 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(pages));
+
 	if (bio)
 		return submit_one_bio(READ, bio, 0, bio_flags);
 	return 0;
@@ -4493,9 +4656,9 @@ int read_extent_buffer_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 		page = extent_buffer_page(eb, i);
 		if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
 			ClearPageError(page);
-			err = __extent_read_full_page(tree, page,
-						      get_extent, &bio,
-						      mirror_num, &bio_flags);
+			err = __extent_read_full_page(
+						tree, page, get_extent, &bio,
+						mirror_num, &bio_flags, 0);
 			if (err)
 				ret = err;
 		} else {
-- 
1.6.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Liu Bo

2012-Jun-13 10:19 UTC

head link

[PATCH 4/4] Btrfs: apply rwlock for extent state

We used to protect both extent state tree and an individual state''s
state
by tree->lock, but this can be an obstacle of lockless read.

So we seperate them here:
o tree->lock protects the tree
o state->lock protects the state.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |  380 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.h |    3 +-
 2 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index bb66e3c..4c6b743 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *extent_buffer_cache;
 static LIST_HEAD(buffers);
 static LIST_HEAD(states);
 
-#define LEAK_DEBUG 0
+#define LEAK_DEBUG 1
 #if LEAK_DEBUG
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(leak_lock);
 #endif
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ void extent_io_tree_init(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&tree->csum, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	tree->ops = NULL;
 	tree->dirty_bytes = 0;
-	spin_lock_init(&tree->lock);
+	rwlock_init(&tree->lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&tree->buffer_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&tree->csum_lock);
 	tree->mapping = mapping;
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ static struct extent_state *alloc_extent_state(gfp_t mask)
 #endif
 	atomic_set(&state->refs, 1);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&state->wq);
+	spin_lock_init(&state->lock);
 	trace_alloc_extent_state(state, mask, _RET_IP_);
 	return state;
 }
@@ -281,6 +282,7 @@ static void merge_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 		if (!other_node)
 			break;
 		other = rb_entry(other_node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
+		/* FIXME: need other->lock? */
 		if (other->end != state->start - 1 ||
 		    other->state != state->state)
 			break;
@@ -297,6 +299,7 @@ static void merge_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 		if (!other_node)
 			break;
 		other = rb_entry(other_node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
+		/* FIXME: need other->lock? */
 		if (other->start != state->end + 1 ||
 		    other->state != state->state)
 			break;
@@ -364,7 +367,10 @@ static int insert_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 		return -EEXIST;
 	}
 	state->tree = tree;
+
+	spin_lock(&state->lock);
 	merge_state(tree, state);
+	spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -410,6 +416,23 @@ static int split_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree, struct
extent_state *orig,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static struct extent_state *
+alloc_extent_state_atomic(struct extent_state *prealloc)
+{
+	if (!prealloc)
+		prealloc = alloc_extent_state(GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+	return prealloc;
+}
+
+enum extent_lock_type {
+	EXTENT_READ    = 0,
+	EXTENT_WRITE   = 1,
+	EXTENT_RLOCKED = 2,
+	EXTENT_WLOCKED = 3,
+	EXTENT_LAST    = 4,
+};
+
 static struct extent_state *next_state(struct extent_state *state)
 {
 	struct rb_node *next = rb_next(&state->rb_node);
@@ -426,13 +449,17 @@ static struct extent_state *next_state(struct extent_state
*state)
  * If no bits are set on the state struct after clearing things, the
  * struct is freed and removed from the tree
  */
-static struct extent_state *clear_state_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
-					    struct extent_state *state,
-					    int *bits, int wake)
+static int __clear_state_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
+			     struct extent_state *state,
+			     int *bits, int wake, int check)
 {
-	struct extent_state *next;
 	int bits_to_clear = *bits & ~EXTENT_CTLBITS;
 
+	if (check) {
+		if ((state->state & ~bits_to_clear) == 0)
+			return 1;
+	}
+
 	if ((bits_to_clear & EXTENT_DIRTY) && (state->state &
EXTENT_DIRTY)) {
 		u64 range = state->end - state->start + 1;
 		WARN_ON(range > tree->dirty_bytes);
@@ -442,7 +469,17 @@ static struct extent_state *clear_state_bit(struct
extent_io_tree *tree,
 	state->state &= ~bits_to_clear;
 	if (wake)
 		wake_up(&state->wq);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct extent_state *
+try_free_or_merge_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree, struct extent_state
*state)
+{
+	struct extent_state *next = NULL;
+
+	BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&state->lock));
 	if (state->state == 0) {
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		next = next_state(state);
 		if (state->tree) {
 			rb_erase(&state->rb_node, &tree->state);
@@ -453,18 +490,17 @@ static struct extent_state *clear_state_bit(struct
extent_io_tree *tree,
 		}
 	} else {
 		merge_state(tree, state);
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		next = next_state(state);
 	}
 	return next;
 }
 
-static struct extent_state *
-alloc_extent_state_atomic(struct extent_state *prealloc)
+static struct extent_state *clear_state_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
+			   struct extent_state *state, int *bits, int wake)
 {
-	if (!prealloc)
-		prealloc = alloc_extent_state(GFP_ATOMIC);
-
-	return prealloc;
+	__clear_state_bit(tree, state, bits, wake, 0);
+	return try_free_or_merge_state(tree, state);
 }
 
 void extent_io_tree_panic(struct extent_io_tree *tree, int err)
@@ -474,6 +510,97 @@ void extent_io_tree_panic(struct extent_io_tree *tree, int
err)
 		    "thread while locked.");
 }
 
+static int test_merge_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
+			    struct extent_state *state)
+{
+	struct extent_state *other;
+	struct rb_node *other_node;
+
+	if (state->state & (EXTENT_IOBITS | EXTENT_BOUNDARY))
+		return 0;
+
+	other_node = rb_prev(&state->rb_node);
+	if (other_node) {
+		other = rb_entry(other_node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
+		if (other->end == state->start - 1 &&
+		    other->state == state->state)
+			return 1;
+	}
+	other_node = rb_next(&state->rb_node);
+	if (other_node) {
+		other = rb_entry(other_node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
+		if (other->start == state->end + 1 &&
+		    other->state == state->state)
+			return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void process_merge_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start)
+{
+	struct extent_state *state = NULL;
+	struct rb_node *node = NULL;
+
+	if (!tree || start == (u64)-1) {
+		WARN_ON(1);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	write_lock(&tree->lock);
+	node = tree_search(tree, start);
+	if (!node) {
+		printk(KERN_INFO "write side: not find states"
+		       " to merge %llu\n", start);
+		goto out;
+	}
+	state = rb_entry(node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
+	/* should merge all states around this one */
+	spin_lock(&state->lock);
+	merge_state(tree, state);
+	spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+out:
+	write_unlock(&tree->lock);
+}
+
+static void extent_rw_lock(struct extent_io_tree *tree, int *rw)
+{
+	int lock = *rw;
+
+	if (lock == EXTENT_READ) {
+		read_lock(&tree->lock);
+		*rw = EXTENT_RLOCKED;
+	} else if (lock == EXTENT_WRITE) {
+		write_lock(&tree->lock);
+		*rw = EXTENT_WLOCKED;
+	} else {
+		WARN_ON(1);
+	}
+}
+
+static void extent_rw_unlock(struct extent_io_tree *tree, int *rw)
+{
+	int lock = *rw;
+
+	if (lock == EXTENT_RLOCKED)
+		read_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	if (lock == EXTENT_WLOCKED)
+		write_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	*rw = EXTENT_READ;
+}
+
+static int extent_rw_flip(struct extent_io_tree *tree, int *rw)
+{
+	int lock = *rw;
+
+	if (lock == EXTENT_RLOCKED) {
+		read_unlock(&tree->lock);
+		*rw = EXTENT_WRITE;
+		return 1;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * clear some bits on a range in the tree.  This may require splitting
  * or inserting elements in the tree, so the gfp mask is used to
@@ -496,8 +623,13 @@ int clear_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64
start, u64 end,
 	struct extent_state *prealloc = NULL;
 	struct rb_node *node;
 	u64 last_end;
+	u64 orig_start = start;
 	int err;
 	int clear = 0;
+	int rw = EXTENT_READ;
+	int free = 0;
+	int merge = 0;
+	int check = 0;
 
 	if (delete)
 		bits |= ~EXTENT_CTLBITS;
@@ -512,7 +644,8 @@ again:
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+	/* XXX: after this we''re EXTENT_RLOCKED/EXTENT_WLOCKED */
+	extent_rw_lock(tree, &rw);
 	if (cached_state) {
 		cached = *cached_state;
 
@@ -545,8 +678,10 @@ hit_next:
 	WARN_ON(state->end < start);
 	last_end = state->end;
 
+	spin_lock(&state->lock);
 	/* the state doesn''t have the wanted bits, go ahead */
 	if (!(state->state & bits)) {
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		state = next_state(state);
 		goto next;
 	}
@@ -568,6 +703,11 @@ hit_next:
 	 */
 
 	if (state->start < start) {
+		/* split needs a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw)) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+			goto again;
+		}
 		prealloc = alloc_extent_state_atomic(prealloc);
 		BUG_ON(!prealloc);
 		err = split_state(tree, state, prealloc, start);
@@ -575,11 +715,15 @@ hit_next:
 			extent_io_tree_panic(tree, err);
 
 		prealloc = NULL;
-		if (err)
+		if (err) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			goto out;
+		}
 		if (state->end <= end) {
 			state = clear_state_bit(tree, state, &bits, wake);
 			goto next;
+		} else {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		}
 		goto search_again;
 	}
@@ -590,22 +734,44 @@ hit_next:
 	 * on the first half
 	 */
 	if (state->start <= end && state->end > end) {
+		/* split needs a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw)) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+			goto again;
+		}
 		prealloc = alloc_extent_state_atomic(prealloc);
 		BUG_ON(!prealloc);
 		err = split_state(tree, state, prealloc, end + 1);
 		if (err)
 			extent_io_tree_panic(tree, err);
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 
 		if (wake)
 			wake_up(&state->wq);
 
+		spin_lock(&prealloc->lock);
 		clear_state_bit(tree, prealloc, &bits, wake);
 
 		prealloc = NULL;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	state = clear_state_bit(tree, state, &bits, wake);
+	check = (rw == EXTENT_RLOCKED) ? 1 : 0;
+	free = __clear_state_bit(tree, state, &bits, wake, check);
+	if (free && rw == EXTENT_RLOCKED) {
+		/* this one will be freed, so it needs a write lock */
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+		extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw);
+		goto again;
+	}
+	if (rw == EXTENT_RLOCKED) {
+		merge = test_merge_state(tree, state);
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+		state = next_state(state);
+	} else {
+		/* this one will unlock state->lock for us */
+		state = try_free_or_merge_state(tree, state);
+	}
 next:
 	if (last_end == (u64)-1)
 		goto out;
@@ -615,16 +781,18 @@ next:
 	goto search_again;
 
 out:
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	extent_rw_unlock(tree, &rw);
 	if (prealloc)
 		free_extent_state(prealloc);
+	if (merge)
+		process_merge_state(tree, orig_start);
 
 	return 0;
 
 search_again:
 	if (start > end)
 		goto out;
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	extent_rw_unlock(tree, &rw);
 	if (mask & __GFP_WAIT)
 		cond_resched();
 	goto again;
@@ -637,9 +805,9 @@ static void wait_on_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 {
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 	prepare_to_wait(&state->wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	read_unlock(&tree->lock);
 	schedule();
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+	read_lock(&tree->lock);
 	finish_wait(&state->wq, &wait);
 }
 
@@ -653,7 +821,7 @@ void wait_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
u64 end, int bits)
 	struct extent_state *state;
 	struct rb_node *node;
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+	read_lock(&tree->lock);
 again:
 	while (1) {
 		/*
@@ -669,22 +837,27 @@ again:
 		if (state->start > end)
 			goto out;
 
+		spin_lock(&state->lock);
 		if (state->state & bits) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			start = state->start;
 			atomic_inc(&state->refs);
 			wait_on_state(tree, state);
 			free_extent_state(state);
 			goto again;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		start = state->end + 1;
 
 		if (start > end)
 			break;
 
-		cond_resched_lock(&tree->lock);
+		read_unlock(&tree->lock);
+		cond_resched();
+		read_lock(&tree->lock);
 	}
 out:
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	read_unlock(&tree->lock);
 }
 
 static void set_state_bits(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
@@ -734,6 +907,9 @@ __set_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64
end,
 	int err = 0;
 	u64 last_start;
 	u64 last_end;
+	u64 orig_start = start;
+	int rw = EXTENT_READ;
+	int merge = 0;
 
 	bits |= EXTENT_FIRST_DELALLOC;
 again:
@@ -742,7 +918,8 @@ again:
 		BUG_ON(!prealloc);
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+	/* XXX: after this we''re EXTENT_RLOCKED/EXTENT_WLOCKED */
+	extent_rw_lock(tree, &rw);
 	if (cached_state && *cached_state) {
 		state = *cached_state;
 		if (state->start <= start && state->end > start
&&
@@ -757,6 +934,9 @@ again:
 	 */
 	node = tree_search(tree, start);
 	if (!node) {
+		/* XXX: insert need a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw))
+			goto again;
 		prealloc = alloc_extent_state_atomic(prealloc);
 		BUG_ON(!prealloc);
 		err = insert_state(tree, prealloc, start, end, &bits);
@@ -771,6 +951,7 @@ hit_next:
 	last_start = state->start;
 	last_end = state->end;
 
+	spin_lock(&state->lock);
 	/*
 	 * | ---- desired range ---- |
 	 * | state |
@@ -779,6 +960,7 @@ hit_next:
 	 */
 	if (state->start == start && state->end <= end) {
 		if (state->state & exclusive_bits) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			*failed_start = state->start;
 			err = -EEXIST;
 			goto out;
@@ -786,7 +968,13 @@ hit_next:
 
 		set_state_bits(tree, state, &bits);
 		cache_state(state, cached_state);
-		merge_state(tree, state);
+		/* XXX */
+		if (rw == EXTENT_RLOCKED)
+			merge = test_merge_state(tree, state);
+		else
+			merge_state(tree, state);
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+
 		if (last_end == (u64)-1)
 			goto out;
 		start = last_end + 1;
@@ -815,11 +1003,18 @@ hit_next:
 	 */
 	if (state->start < start) {
 		if (state->state & exclusive_bits) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			*failed_start = start;
 			err = -EEXIST;
 			goto out;
 		}
 
+		/* XXX: split needs a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw)) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
 		prealloc = alloc_extent_state_atomic(prealloc);
 		BUG_ON(!prealloc);
 		err = split_state(tree, state, prealloc, start);
@@ -827,12 +1022,15 @@ hit_next:
 			extent_io_tree_panic(tree, err);
 
 		prealloc = NULL;
-		if (err)
+		if (err) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			goto out;
+		}
 		if (state->end <= end) {
 			set_state_bits(tree, state, &bits);
 			cache_state(state, cached_state);
 			merge_state(tree, state);
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			if (last_end == (u64)-1)
 				goto out;
 			start = last_end + 1;
@@ -840,6 +1038,8 @@ hit_next:
 			if (start < end && state && state->start == start
&&
 			    !need_resched())
 				goto hit_next;
+		} else {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		}
 		goto search_again;
 	}
@@ -852,6 +1052,12 @@ hit_next:
 	 */
 	if (state->start > start) {
 		u64 this_end;
+
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+		/* XXX: split need a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw))
+			goto again;
+
 		if (end < last_start)
 			this_end = end;
 		else
@@ -869,7 +1075,9 @@ hit_next:
 		if (err)
 			extent_io_tree_panic(tree, err);
 
+		spin_lock(&prealloc->lock);
 		cache_state(prealloc, cached_state);
+		spin_unlock(&prealloc->lock);
 		prealloc = NULL;
 		start = this_end + 1;
 		goto search_again;
@@ -882,20 +1090,30 @@ hit_next:
 	 */
 	if (state->start <= end && state->end > end) {
 		if (state->state & exclusive_bits) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			*failed_start = start;
 			err = -EEXIST;
 			goto out;
 		}
 
+		/* XXX: split need a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw)) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
 		prealloc = alloc_extent_state_atomic(prealloc);
 		BUG_ON(!prealloc);
 		err = split_state(tree, state, prealloc, end + 1);
 		if (err)
 			extent_io_tree_panic(tree, err);
 
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+		spin_lock(&prealloc->lock);
 		set_state_bits(tree, prealloc, &bits);
 		cache_state(prealloc, cached_state);
 		merge_state(tree, prealloc);
+		spin_unlock(&prealloc->lock);
 		prealloc = NULL;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -903,16 +1121,18 @@ hit_next:
 	goto search_again;
 
 out:
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	extent_rw_unlock(tree, &rw);
 	if (prealloc)
 		free_extent_state(prealloc);
+	if (merge)
+		process_merge_state(tree, orig_start);
 
 	return err;
 
 search_again:
 	if (start > end)
 		goto out;
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	extent_rw_unlock(tree, &rw);
 	if (mask & __GFP_WAIT)
 		cond_resched();
 	goto again;
@@ -951,6 +1171,9 @@ int convert_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64
start, u64 end,
 	int err = 0;
 	u64 last_start;
 	u64 last_end;
+	u64 orig_start = start;
+	int rw = EXTENT_READ;
+	int merge = 0;
 
 again:
 	if (!prealloc && (mask & __GFP_WAIT)) {
@@ -959,13 +1182,18 @@ again:
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+	/* XXX: after this we''re EXTENT_RLOCKED/EXTENT_WLOCKED */
+	extent_rw_lock(tree, &rw);
 	/*
 	 * this search will find all the extents that end after
 	 * our range starts.
 	 */
 	node = tree_search(tree, start);
 	if (!node) {
+		/* XXX: insert need a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw))
+			goto again;
+
 		prealloc = alloc_extent_state_atomic(prealloc);
 		if (!prealloc) {
 			err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -982,6 +1210,7 @@ hit_next:
 	last_start = state->start;
 	last_end = state->end;
 
+	spin_lock(&state->lock);
 	/*
 	 * | ---- desired range ---- |
 	 * | state |
@@ -990,16 +1219,26 @@ hit_next:
 	 */
 	if (state->start == start && state->end <= end) {
 		set_state_bits(tree, state, &bits);
-		state = clear_state_bit(tree, state, &clear_bits, 0);
+		__clear_state_bit(tree, state, &clear_bits, 0, 0);
+		if (rw == EXTENT_LOCKED)
+			merge = test_merge_state(tree, state);
+		else
+			merge_state(tree, state);
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+
 		if (last_end == (u64)-1)
 			goto out;
+
 		start = last_end + 1;
+		state = next_state(state);
 		if (start < end && state && state->start == start
&&
 		    !need_resched())
 			goto hit_next;
 		goto search_again;
 	}
 
+	WARN_ON(1);
+
 	/*
 	 *     | ---- desired range ---- |
 	 * | state |
@@ -1017,8 +1256,15 @@ hit_next:
 	 * desired bit on it.
 	 */
 	if (state->start < start) {
+		/* XXX: split need a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw)) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+			goto again;
+		}
+
 		prealloc = alloc_extent_state_atomic(prealloc);
 		if (!prealloc) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			err = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
 		}
@@ -1026,8 +1272,10 @@ hit_next:
 		if (err)
 			extent_io_tree_panic(tree, err);
 		prealloc = NULL;
-		if (err)
+		if (err) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			goto out;
+		}
 		if (state->end <= end) {
 			set_state_bits(tree, state, &bits);
 			state = clear_state_bit(tree, state, &clear_bits, 0);
@@ -1037,6 +1285,8 @@ hit_next:
 			if (start < end && state && state->start == start
&&
 			    !need_resched())
 				goto hit_next;
+		} else {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		}
 		goto search_again;
 	}
@@ -1049,11 +1299,17 @@ hit_next:
 	 */
 	if (state->start > start) {
 		u64 this_end;
+
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		if (end < last_start)
 			this_end = end;
 		else
 			this_end = last_start - 1;
 
+		/* XXX: insert need a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw))
+			goto again;
+
 		prealloc = alloc_extent_state_atomic(prealloc);
 		if (!prealloc) {
 			err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1079,6 +1335,10 @@ hit_next:
 	 * on the first half
 	 */
 	if (state->start <= end && state->end > end) {
+		/* XXX: split need a write lock */
+		if (extent_rw_flip(tree, &rw))
+			goto again;
+
 		prealloc = alloc_extent_state_atomic(prealloc);
 		if (!prealloc) {
 			err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1089,7 +1349,11 @@ hit_next:
 		if (err)
 			extent_io_tree_panic(tree, err);
 
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+		spin_lock(&prealloc->lock);
+
 		set_state_bits(tree, prealloc, &bits);
+		/* will unlock prealloc lock for us */
 		clear_state_bit(tree, prealloc, &clear_bits, 0);
 		prealloc = NULL;
 		goto out;
@@ -1098,16 +1362,20 @@ hit_next:
 	goto search_again;
 
 out:
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	/* XXX */
+	extent_rw_unlock(tree, &rw);
 	if (prealloc)
 		free_extent_state(prealloc);
+	if (merge)
+		process_merge_state(tree, orig_start);
 
 	return err;
 
 search_again:
 	if (start > end)
 		goto out;
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	/* XXX */
+	extent_rw_unlock(tree, &rw);
 	if (mask & __GFP_WAIT)
 		cond_resched();
 	goto again;
@@ -1267,8 +1535,12 @@ struct extent_state *find_first_extent_bit_state(struct
extent_io_tree *tree,
 
 	while (1) {
 		state = rb_entry(node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
-		if (state->end >= start && (state->state & bits))
+		spin_lock(&state->lock);
+		if (state->end >= start && (state->state & bits)) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			return state;
+		}
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 
 		node = rb_next(node);
 		if (!node)
@@ -1291,14 +1563,14 @@ int find_first_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
u64 start,
 	struct extent_state *state;
 	int ret = 1;
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+	read_lock(&tree->lock);
 	state = find_first_extent_bit_state(tree, start, bits);
 	if (state) {
 		*start_ret = state->start;
 		*end_ret = state->end;
 		ret = 0;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	read_unlock(&tree->lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1318,7 +1590,7 @@ static noinline u64 find_delalloc_range(struct
extent_io_tree *tree,
 	u64 found = 0;
 	u64 total_bytes = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+	read_lock(&tree->lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * this search will find all the extents that end after
@@ -1333,15 +1605,20 @@ static noinline u64 find_delalloc_range(struct
extent_io_tree *tree,
 
 	while (1) {
 		state = rb_entry(node, struct extent_state, rb_node);
+		spin_lock(&state->lock);
 		if (found && (state->start != cur_start ||
 			      (state->state & EXTENT_BOUNDARY))) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			goto out;
 		}
 		if (!(state->state & EXTENT_DELALLOC)) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			if (!found)
 				*end = state->end;
 			goto out;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&state->lock);
+
 		if (!found) {
 			*start = state->start;
 			*cached_state = state;
@@ -1358,7 +1635,7 @@ static noinline u64 find_delalloc_range(struct
extent_io_tree *tree,
 			break;
 	}
 out:
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	read_unlock(&tree->lock);
 	return found;
 }
 
@@ -1619,7 +1896,7 @@ u64 count_range_bits(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+	read_lock(&tree->lock);
 	if (cur_start == 0 && bits == EXTENT_DIRTY) {
 		total_bytes = tree->dirty_bytes;
 		goto out;
@@ -1638,7 +1915,9 @@ u64 count_range_bits(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 			break;
 		if (contig && found && state->start > last + 1)
 			break;
+		spin_lock(&state->lock);
 		if (state->end >= cur_start && (state->state & bits) ==
bits) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			total_bytes += min(search_end, state->end) + 1 -
 				       max(cur_start, state->start);
 			if (total_bytes >= max_bytes)
@@ -1649,14 +1928,18 @@ u64 count_range_bits(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 			}
 			last = state->end;
 		} else if (contig && found) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			break;
+		} else {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		}
+
 		node = rb_next(node);
 		if (!node)
 			break;
 	}
 out:
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	read_unlock(&tree->lock);
 	return total_bytes;
 }
 
@@ -1707,7 +1990,7 @@ int test_range_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
u64 end,
 	struct rb_node *node;
 	int bitset = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+	read_lock(&tree->lock);
 	if (cached && cached->tree && cached->start <= start
&&
 	    cached->end > start)
 		node = &cached->rb_node;
@@ -1724,13 +2007,18 @@ int test_range_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64
start, u64 end,
 		if (state->start > end)
 			break;
 
+		spin_lock(&state->lock);
 		if (state->state & bits) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			bitset = 1;
 			if (!filled)
 				break;
 		} else if (filled) {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 			bitset = 0;
 			break;
+		} else {
+			spin_unlock(&state->lock);
 		}
 
 		if (state->end == (u64)-1)
@@ -1746,7 +2034,7 @@ int test_range_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
u64 end,
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+	read_unlock(&tree->lock);
 	return bitset;
 }
 
@@ -1959,11 +2247,11 @@ static int clean_io_failure(u64 start, struct page
*page)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.lock);
+	read_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.lock);
 	state = find_first_extent_bit_state(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree,
 					    failrec->start,
 					    EXTENT_LOCKED);
-	spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.lock);
+	read_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.lock);
 
 	if (state && state->start == failrec->start) {
 		map_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info->mapping_tree;
@@ -2097,12 +2385,12 @@ static int bio_readpage_error(struct bio *failed_bio,
struct page *page,
 	}
 
 	if (!state) {
-		spin_lock(&tree->lock);
+		read_lock(&tree->lock);
 		state = find_first_extent_bit_state(tree, failrec->start,
 						    EXTENT_LOCKED);
 		if (state && state->start != failrec->start)
 			state = NULL;
-		spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
+		read_unlock(&tree->lock);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -2701,7 +2989,7 @@ static int __extent_read_full_page(struct extent_io_tree
*tree,
 			set_extent_uptodate(tree, cur, cur + iosize - 1,
 					    &cached, GFP_NOFS);
 			unlock_extent_cached(tree, cur, cur + iosize - 1,
-			                     &cached, GFP_NOFS);
+					     &cached, GFP_NOFS);
 			cur = cur + iosize;
 			pg_offset += iosize;
 			continue;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
index c896962..7a54d9f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ struct extent_io_tree {
 	struct address_space *mapping;
 	u64 dirty_bytes;
 	int track_uptodate;
-	spinlock_t lock;
+	rwlock_t lock;
 	spinlock_t buffer_lock;
 	spinlock_t csum_lock;
 	struct extent_io_ops *ops;
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct extent_state {
 	wait_queue_head_t wq;
 	atomic_t refs;
 	unsigned long state;
+	spinlock_t lock;
 
 	/* for use by the FS */
 	u64 private;
-- 
1.6.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Zach Brown

2012-Jun-13 16:07 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

>   int set_state_private(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64
private)
>   {
[...]> +	ret = radix_tree_insert(&tree->csum, (unsigned long)start,
> +			       (void *)((unsigned long)private<<  1));
Will this fail for 64bit files on 32bit hosts?
> +	BUG_ON(ret);
I wonder if we can patch BUG_ON() to break the build if its only
argument is "ret".

- z
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Liu Bo

2012-Jun-14 01:50 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

On 06/14/2012 12:07 AM, Zach Brown wrote:
> 
>>   int set_state_private(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64
>> private)
>>   {
> [...]
>> +    ret = radix_tree_insert(&tree->csum, (unsigned long)start,
>> +                   (void *)((unsigned long)private<<  1));
> 
> Will this fail for 64bit files on 32bit hosts?

In theory it will fail, but crc32c return u32, so private will be originally
u32,
and it''d be ok on 32bit hosts.
> 
>> +    BUG_ON(ret);
> 
> I wonder if we can patch BUG_ON() to break the build if its only
> argument is "ret".
> 

why?

thanks,
liubo
> - z
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

David Sterba

2012-Jun-14 15:03 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:19:08PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:> We used to issue a checksum to an extent state of 4K range for read endio,
> but now we want to use larger range for performance optimization, so
instead we
> create a radix tree for checksum, where an item stands for checksum of 4K
data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> index 25900af..c896962 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> @@ -96,11 +96,13 @@ struct extent_io_ops {
>  struct extent_io_tree {
>  	struct rb_root state;
>  	struct radix_tree_root buffer;
> +	struct radix_tree_root csum;
>  	struct address_space *mapping;
>  	u64 dirty_bytes;
>  	int track_uptodate;
>  	spinlock_t lock;
>  	spinlock_t buffer_lock;
> +	spinlock_t csum_lock;
I''m afraid 3 spinlocks sharing the same cacheline will bite and hurt
performance.

struct extent_io_tree {
        struct rb_root             state;                /*     0     8 */
        struct radix_tree_root     buffer;               /*     8    16 */
        struct radix_tree_root     csum;                 /*    24    16 */
        struct address_space *     mapping;              /*    40     8 */
        u64                        dirty_bytes;          /*    48     8 */
        int                        track_uptodate;       /*    56     4 */

        /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */

        /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
        rwlock_t                   lock;                 /*    64     8 */
        spinlock_t                 buffer_lock;          /*    72     4 */
        spinlock_t                 csum_lock;            /*    76     4 */
        struct extent_io_ops *     ops;                  /*    80     8 */

        /* size: 88, cachelines: 2, members: 10 */
        /* sum members: 84, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */
        /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
};

so we have to live with 2 cachenlines, maybe it''ll be enough to split
the structure to 2 sections depending on the access paterns. Definetely
for later, but I think it should be noted as the patchset tries to
improve performance.

>  	struct extent_io_ops *ops;
>  };

david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

David Sterba

2012-Jun-14 16:12 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Btrfs: use large extent range for read and its endio

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:19:10PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:> we use larger extent state range for both readpages and read endio, so that
> we can lock or unlock less and avoid most of split ops, then we''ll
reduce write
> locks taken at endio time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |  201
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 081fe13..bb66e3c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -2258,18 +2258,26 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio
*bio, int err)
>  	struct bio_vec *bvec_end = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt - 1;
>  	struct bio_vec *bvec = bio->bi_io_vec;
>  	struct extent_io_tree *tree;
> +	struct extent_state *cached = NULL;
>  	u64 start;
>  	u64 end;
>  	int whole_page;
>  	int mirror;
>  	int ret;
> +	u64 up_start, up_end, un_start, un_end;
> +	int up_first, un_first;
> +	int for_uptodate[bio->bi_vcnt];
The array size depends on an argument, compiler will handle it by
dynamically expanding the stackframe. What is the expected maximum value
for bi_vcnt ? There''s no hard limit AFAICS, the value gets incremented
on each page in the bio. If the function is called from the worker
thread, it''s not much of a problem even for values like 128.

Alternate way to avoid over-limit stack consumption is to declare an
array to hold a fair number of items (eg. 16), and fall back to kmalloc
otherwise.
> +	int i = 0;
> +
> +	up_start = un_start = (u64)-1;
> +	up_end = un_end = 0;
> +	up_first = un_first = 1;
>  
>  	if (err)
>  		uptodate = 0;
>  
>  	do {
>  		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
> -		struct extent_state *cached = NULL;
>  
>  		pr_debug("end_bio_extent_readpage: bi_vcnt=%d, idx=%d, err=%d,
"
>  			 "mirror=%ld\n", bio->bi_vcnt, bio->bi_idx, err,
> @@ -2352,7 +2412,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio,
int err)
>  			}
>  			unlock_page(page);
>  		} else {
> -			if (uptodate) {
> +			if (for_uptodate[i++]) {
>  				check_page_uptodate(tree, page);
>  			} else {
>  				clearpageuptodate(page);
> @@ -2360,6 +2420,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio,
int err)
>  			}
>  			check_page_locked(tree, page);
>  		}
> +		++bvec;
can you please move the i++ increments here? From reading the code it''s
not clear on first sight if the sideeffects are ok.
>  	} while (bvec <= bvec_end);
>  
>  	bio_put(bio);
> @@ -2554,6 +2615,8 @@ static int __extent_read_full_page(struct
extent_io_tree *tree,
>  
>  	end = page_end;
>  	while (1) {
> +		if (range_lock)
> +			break;
with range_lock set, this is equivalent to calling

2896	set_page_extent_mapped(page);

(plus the cleancache code), a few lines above. Is this inteded? It''s
actually called with ''1'' from a single place,
process_batch_pages().
>  		lock_extent(tree, start, end);
>  		ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(inode, start);
>  		if (!ordered)
> @@ -3497,6 +3560,59 @@ int extent_writepages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +struct page_list {
> +	struct page *page;
> +	struct list_head list;
> +};
> +
> +static int process_batch_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
> +			       struct address_space *mapping,
> +			       struct list_head *lock_pages, int *page_cnt,
> +			       u64 lock_start, u64 lock_end,
> +				get_extent_t get_extent, struct bio **bio,
> +				unsigned long *bio_flags)
> +{
> +	u64 page_start;
> +	struct page_list *plist;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered = NULL;
> +
> +		lock_extent(tree, lock_start, lock_end);
> +		page_start = lock_start;
> +		while (page_start < lock_end) {
> +			ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(mapping->host,
> +							      page_start);
> +			if (ordered) {
> +				page_start = ordered->file_offset;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +			page_start += PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
> +		}
> +		if (!ordered)
> +			break;
You''re leaving the range [lock_start, lock_end) locked after taking
this
branch. Intended?
> +		unlock_extent(tree, lock_start, lock_end);
> +		btrfs_start_ordered_extent(mapping->host, ordered, 1);
> +		btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
> +	}
> +
> +	plist = NULL;
> +	while (!list_empty(lock_pages)) {
> +		plist = list_entry(lock_pages->prev, struct page_list, list);
> +
> +		__extent_read_full_page(tree, plist->page, get_extent,
> +					bio, 0, bio_flags, 1);
> +		page_cache_release(plist->page);
> +		list_del(&plist->list);
> +		plist->page = NULL;
you can drop this assignment
> +		kfree(plist);
> +		(*page_cnt)--;
> +	}
> +
> +	WARN_ON((*page_cnt));
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int extent_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
>  		     struct address_space *mapping,
>  		     struct list_head *pages, unsigned nr_pages,--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Zach Brown

2012-Jun-14 16:42 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

>>> +    BUG_ON(ret);
>>
>> I wonder if we can patch BUG_ON() to break the build if its only
>> argument is "ret".
>>
>
> why?
Well, I''m mostly joking :).  That would be a very silly change to make.

But only mostly joking.  btrfs does have a real fragility problem from
all these incomplete error handling paths:

	$ grep ''BUG_ON(ret.*)'' fs/btrfs/*.c | wc -l
	197

We should be fixing these, not adding more.  I don''t think any patches
should be merged which add more of these.

- z
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Liu Bo

2012-Jun-15 01:50 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Btrfs: use large extent range for read and its endio

On 06/15/2012 12:12 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:19:10PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> we use larger extent state range for both readpages and read endio, so
that
>> we can lock or unlock less and avoid most of split ops, then
we''ll reduce write
>> locks taken at endio time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |  201
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> index 081fe13..bb66e3c 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
>> @@ -2258,18 +2258,26 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio
*bio, int err)
>>  	struct bio_vec *bvec_end = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt - 1;
>>  	struct bio_vec *bvec = bio->bi_io_vec;
>>  	struct extent_io_tree *tree;
>> +	struct extent_state *cached = NULL;
>>  	u64 start;
>>  	u64 end;
>>  	int whole_page;
>>  	int mirror;
>>  	int ret;
>> +	u64 up_start, up_end, un_start, un_end;
>> +	int up_first, un_first;
>> +	int for_uptodate[bio->bi_vcnt];
> 
> The array size depends on an argument, compiler will handle it by
> dynamically expanding the stackframe. What is the expected maximum value
> for bi_vcnt ? There''s no hard limit AFAICS, the value gets
incremented
> on each page in the bio. If the function is called from the worker
> thread, it''s not much of a problem even for values like 128.
> 
> Alternate way to avoid over-limit stack consumption is to declare an
> array to hold a fair number of items (eg. 16), and fall back to kmalloc
> otherwise.
> 

hmm, you''re right.  I''m going to use kmalloc with
KERNEL_ATOMIC.

>> +	int i = 0;
>> +
>> +	up_start = un_start = (u64)-1;
>> +	up_end = un_end = 0;
>> +	up_first = un_first = 1;
>>  
>>  	if (err)
>>  		uptodate = 0;
>>  
>>  	do {
>>  		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
>> -		struct extent_state *cached = NULL;
>>  
>>  		pr_debug("end_bio_extent_readpage: bi_vcnt=%d, idx=%d, err=%d,
"
>>  			 "mirror=%ld\n", bio->bi_vcnt, bio->bi_idx, err,
>> @@ -2352,7 +2412,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio
*bio, int err)
>>  			}
>>  			unlock_page(page);
>>  		} else {
>> -			if (uptodate) {
>> +			if (for_uptodate[i++]) {
>>  				check_page_uptodate(tree, page);
>>  			} else {
>>  				clearpageuptodate(page);
>> @@ -2360,6 +2420,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio
*bio, int err)
>>  			}
>>  			check_page_locked(tree, page);
>>  		}
>> +		++bvec;
> 
> can you please move the i++ increments here? From reading the code
it''s
> not clear on first sight if the sideeffects are ok.
> 

Sure, will update it.
>>  	} while (bvec <= bvec_end);
>>  
>>  	bio_put(bio);
>> @@ -2554,6 +2615,8 @@ static int __extent_read_full_page(struct
extent_io_tree *tree,
>>  
>>  	end = page_end;
>>  	while (1) {
>> +		if (range_lock)
>> +			break;
> 
> with range_lock set, this is equivalent to calling
> 
> 2896	set_page_extent_mapped(page);
> 
> (plus the cleancache code), a few lines above. Is this inteded?
It''s
> actually called with ''1'' from a single place,
process_batch_pages().
> 

Yeah, I want to skip the lock part, since I''ve already locked this
range of extent.
After that, we''ll have a continuous range of extent for read.

>>  		lock_extent(tree, start, end);
>>  		ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(inode, start);
>>  		if (!ordered)
>> @@ -3497,6 +3560,59 @@ int extent_writepages(struct extent_io_tree
*tree,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +struct page_list {
>> +	struct page *page;
>> +	struct list_head list;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int process_batch_pages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
>> +			       struct address_space *mapping,
>> +			       struct list_head *lock_pages, int *page_cnt,
>> +			       u64 lock_start, u64 lock_end,
>> +				get_extent_t get_extent, struct bio **bio,
>> +				unsigned long *bio_flags)
>> +{
>> +	u64 page_start;
>> +	struct page_list *plist;
>> +
>> +	while (1) {
>> +		struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered = NULL;
>> +
>> +		lock_extent(tree, lock_start, lock_end);
>> +		page_start = lock_start;
>> +		while (page_start < lock_end) {
>> +			ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(mapping->host,
>> +							      page_start);
>> +			if (ordered) {
>> +				page_start = ordered->file_offset;
>> +				break;
>> +			}
>> +			page_start += PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
>> +		}
>> +		if (!ordered)
>> +			break;
> 
> You''re leaving the range [lock_start, lock_end) locked after
taking this
> branch. Intended?
> 

Yeah, this is what it should be.
Usually we do:

o  lock the range that is going to be sent to read (at read_page)
o  set the range uptodate and unlock it (at end_io)

>> +		unlock_extent(tree, lock_start, lock_end);
>> +		btrfs_start_ordered_extent(mapping->host, ordered, 1);
>> +		btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	plist = NULL;
>> +	while (!list_empty(lock_pages)) {
>> +		plist = list_entry(lock_pages->prev, struct page_list, list);
>> +
>> +		__extent_read_full_page(tree, plist->page, get_extent,
>> +					bio, 0, bio_flags, 1);
>> +		page_cache_release(plist->page);
>> +		list_del(&plist->list);
>> +		plist->page = NULL;
> 
> you can drop this assignment
> 

Sure.

Thanks a lot for reviewing! :)


thanks,
liubo
>> +		kfree(plist);
>> +		(*page_cnt)--;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	WARN_ON((*page_cnt));
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  int extent_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
>>  		     struct address_space *mapping,
>>  		     struct list_head *pages, unsigned nr_pages,
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Chris Mason

2012-Jul-06 15:37 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:50:52PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:> On 06/14/2012 12:07 AM, Zach Brown wrote:
> 
> > 
> >>   int set_state_private(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
u64
> >> private)
> >>   {
> > [...]
> >> +    ret = radix_tree_insert(&tree->csum, (unsigned
long)start,
> >> +                   (void *)((unsigned long)private<<  1));
> > 
> > Will this fail for 64bit files on 32bit hosts?
> 
> 
> In theory it will fail, but crc32c return u32, so private will be
originally u32,
> and it''d be ok on 32bit hosts.
The (unsigned long)start part looks wrong though.  This is the byte offset
from 0, so on a 32 bit machine you won''t be able to have large files.

The page cache also has this limitation, but it gains extra bits
counting page indexes instead of byte indexes.

I''ve made that change here and I''m benchmarking it on my big
flash ;)

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Liu Bo

2012-Jul-07 07:43 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

On 07/06/2012 11:37 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:50:52PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
>> On 06/14/2012 12:07 AM, Zach Brown wrote:
>>
>>>>   int set_state_private(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start,
u64
>>>> private)
>>>>   {
>>> [...]
>>>> +    ret = radix_tree_insert(&tree->csum, (unsigned
long)start,
>>>> +                   (void *)((unsigned long)private<< 
1));
>>> Will this fail for 64bit files on 32bit hosts?
>>
>> In theory it will fail, but crc32c return u32, so private will be
originally u32,
>> and it''d be ok on 32bit hosts.
> 
> The (unsigned long)start part looks wrong though.  This is the byte offset
> from 0, so on a 32 bit machine you won''t be able to have large
files.
> 
> The page cache also has this limitation, but it gains extra bits
> counting page indexes instead of byte indexes.
> 

I see.
> I''ve made that change here and I''m benchmarking it on my
big flash ;)
> 

Thanks a lot. :)

I must note that this patchset is still very initial, and this week
I''ve fixed
a deadlock bug hidden in the 4th patch (it can be triggered by xfstests 208).

I''m planning to set up a worker thread or just use
''endio_meta'' thread for merge_state
and do more tuning work to lessen writer lock.

thanks,
liubo
> -chris
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Btrfs devel - Jun 2012 - [PATCH 0/4 v2][RFC] apply rwlock for extent state

[PATCH 0/4 v2][RFC] apply rwlock for extent state

[PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

[PATCH 2/4] Btrfs: merge adjacent states as much as possible

[PATCH 3/4] Btrfs: use large extent range for read and its endio

[PATCH 4/4] Btrfs: apply rwlock for extent state

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Btrfs: use large extent range for read and its endio

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Btrfs: use large extent range for read and its endio

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: use radix tree for checksum