Btrfs devel - Jan 2009 - [Patch] bit-radix.c: fix declarations

bit-radix.c should #include "bit-radix.h", and add a missing
declaration
for find_next_bit().

Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <wangcong@zeuux.org>

---
diff --git a/bit-radix.c b/bit-radix.c
index 57f6f3c..01bf4af 100644
--- a/bit-radix.c
+++ b/bit-radix.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
  */
 
 #include "kerncompat.h"
-#include "radix-tree.h"
+#include "bit-radix.h"
 
 #define BIT_ARRAY_BYTES 256
 #define BIT_RADIX_BITS_PER_ARRAY ((BIT_ARRAY_BYTES - sizeof(unsigned long)) *
8)
diff --git a/bit-radix.h b/bit-radix.h
index af14e80..ff82c9c 100644
--- a/bit-radix.h
+++ b/bit-radix.h
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
 int set_radix_bit(struct radix_tree_root *radix, unsigned long bit);
 int test_radix_bit(struct radix_tree_root *radix, unsigned long bit);
 int clear_radix_bit(struct radix_tree_root *radix, unsigned long bit);
+unsigned long find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
+                unsigned long offset);
 int find_first_radix_bit(struct radix_tree_root *radix, unsigned long *retbits,
 			 unsigned long start, int nr);
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 22:19 +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> bit-radix.c should #include "bit-radix.h", and add a missing
declaration
> for find_next_bit().
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <wangcong@zeuux.org>
> 
I fixed this a little differently, the bit-radix code wasn''t being used
anymore.  It''s gone now ;)

-chris


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:58:22AM -0500, Chris Mason
wrote:
>On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 22:19 +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>> bit-radix.c should #include "bit-radix.h", and add a missing
declaration
>> for find_next_bit().
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <wangcong@zeuux.org>
>> 
>
>I fixed this a little differently, the bit-radix code wasn''t being
used
>anymore.  It''s gone now ;)
>
Thanks for your explanation!


-- 
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html