asterisk users - Aug 2007 - which OS would be fine for asterisk

Dear 
   
             which Linux version would be fine for asterisk  CentOS 5.0 or
Debian 4.0 or RHEL 4.0
   
  Regards
   
  Satish patel

       
---------------------------------
Choose the right car based on your needs.  Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder
tool.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070824/21b632c9/attachment.htm

CentOS and RHEL are the same thing. One uses the RedHat trademark, the
other doesnt. One is expensive, the other isn't. I don't like to
recommend either because I just don't like RedHat's business
practices.

Personally I recommend SuSE Linux. OpenSuSE without the GUI installed
will do just fine. If you want to buy SLES that's fine, but I really
don't see the value in it.

I concur, Centos 4.4 FTW. ^^

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Edgar Guadamuz" <eguadamuz at gmail.com>
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Date:  Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:50:51 -0600
>I have used CentOS and it works fine and it is easy to install. I know
>that Debian is a little more complicated to install Asterisk and some
>teatures on Debian.
>I'd choice CentOS 4.2 or 4.4, as my personal preference.
>
>_______________________________________________
>--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
>asterisk-users mailing list
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
 




________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at rockynet.com

On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 12:31:15AM -0600, Anthony Francis
wrote:
> I concur, Centos 4.4 FTW. ^^
Centos 4.4, as in not the latest, and already hald the packages are not
in the repositories? Any specific reason you avoid Centos 4.5? Centos5?

Any specific reason to keep using something that is still labled "kernel
2.6.9", that has quite a buggy udev implementation, for once?

Debian++, BTW.

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen       
icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir at jabber.org
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com       
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir