Hello ppl, Searched all over, but couldn't find anything conclusive. Does an off-the-shelf version of Asterisk run without any issues on a 64-bit machine? Does anyone have any 'conclusive' figures? Apologies if this is a repeat question. Would appreciate if I could be redirected to the appropriate link. cheerz - Ben. EMAIL DISCLAIMER : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official business of Mascon shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by Mascon. Any information contained in this email, when addressed to Mascon clients is subject to the terms and conditions in governing client contract. Whilst Mascon takes steps to prevent the transmission of viruses via e-mail, we can not guarantee that any email or attachment is free from computer viruses and you are strongly advised to undertake your own anti-virus precautions. Mascon grants no warranties regarding performance, use or quality of any e-mail or attachment and undertakes no liability for loss or damage, howsoever caused.
On 7/31/07, Benjamin Jacob <benjamin.jacob at mgl.com> wrote:> Searched all over, but couldn't find anything conclusive. > Does an off-the-shelf version of Asterisk run without any issues on a > 64-bit machine? > Does anyone have any 'conclusive' figures?I've run 1.2.14 - 1.2.18 and 1.4.4 - 1.4.9 on CentOS 4.4 and 4.5 x86_64 with no problems. If your distro is one of those supported by http://www.atrpms.net/ then you should be fine - they package zaptel and asterisk for x86_64. If not, it works fine to build on your own, though some versions are a bit finicky (IIRC, earlier versions of 1.2.x wouldn't look for libpri in /usr/lib64, just in /usr/lib. That resulted in a chan_zap module without PRI support if you didn't modify the configure script. 1.4 doesn't seem to suffer from these problems, as they've revamped the whole build system since 1.2. -- j. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070731/5f538ada/attachment-0001.htm
Benjamin Jacob ha scritto:> Hello ppl, > Searched all over, but couldn't find anything conclusive. > Does an off-the-shelf version of Asterisk run without any issues on a > 64-bit machine? > Does anyone have any 'conclusive' figures? > > Apologies if this is a repeat question. Would appreciate if I could be > redirected to the appropriate link. >I use (in production) etch debian amd64 with asterisk, seems to be ok. Tested etch debian 686 on the same hardware also ok. Asterisk 1.2 not 1.4, all the "asterisk*" packages are official debian. Bye. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: massimo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 326 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070731/03ff769a/attachment.vcf -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070731/03ff769a/attachment.pgp
On 7/31/07, Benjamin Jacob <benjamin.jacob at mgl.com> wrote:> > Hello ppl, > Searched all over, but couldn't find anything conclusive. > Does an off-the-shelf version of Asterisk run without any issues on a > 64-bit machine? > Does anyone have any 'conclusive' figures? > > Apologies if this is a repeat question. Would appreciate if I could be > redirected to the appropriate link.Yes. We run a few production machines using the x86_64 version of SuSE Linux 10.1 and Sun Fire x2100 servers for over a year using Asterisk 1.2.x built from source. In addition SuSE includes Asterisk, Zaptel, SpanDSP, app_txfax & app_rxfax however they are bad with updates (for Asterisk packages) so I would suggest you roll your own. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070731/98419501/attachment.htm