I see that 1.0.5 is out. I thought that if I am tracking cvs v1.0.x I would always get the newest releases. However, I just did a fresh update and install from cvs stable and it reports as only being v1.0.3. Should I just be using the tarballs rather than the cvs -r 1_0? Or maybe my initial cvs was incorrect? Thanks! -- -M There are 10 kinds of people in this world: Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
Are you sure you're not looking at the date? -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michael George Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:47 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] cvs stable and 1.0.5 I see that 1.0.5 is out. I thought that if I am tracking cvs v1.0.x I would always get the newest releases. However, I just did a fresh update and install from cvs stable and it reports as only being v1.0.3. Should I just be using the tarballs rather than the cvs -r 1_0? Or maybe my initial cvs was incorrect? Thanks! -- -M There are 10 kinds of people in this world: Those who can count in binary and those who cannot. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:46:33 -0500, Michael George <george@mutualdata.com> wrote:> I see that 1.0.5 is out. I thought that if I am tracking cvs v1.0.x I would > always get the newest releases. However, I just did a fresh update and > install from cvs stable and it reports as only being v1.0.3.Actually, 1.0.6 is out... Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: peter@bowyer.org Tel: +44 1296 768003 VoIP: sip:peter@bowyer.org
Michael George wrote:> I see that 1.0.5 is out. I thought that if I am tracking cvs v1.0.x I would > always get the newest releases. However, I just did a fresh update and > install from cvs stable and it reports as only being v1.0.3. > > Should I just be using the tarballs rather than the cvs -r 1_0? Or maybe my > initial cvs was incorrect?You forgot to rm .version in the source berfore building it.