Hi, I am implementing T.38, and finding a problem getting boxes that work with T.38 for testing. A lot (maybe most) ATAs now claim to support T.38, but I'm finding a lot of these lie. I have one box here that just crashes when it hears a fax tone. :-) I'm looking for boxes known to implement T.38 properly, and which really work in the real world. Regards, Steve
We use the PAP-2NA with fax machines and have not had any problems. Gary> Hi, > > I am implementing T.38, and finding a problem getting boxes that work > with T.38 for testing. A lot (maybe most) ATAs now claim to support > T.38, but I'm finding a lot of these lie. I have one box here that just > crashes when it hears a fax tone. :-) > > I'm looking for boxes known to implement T.38 properly, and which really > work in the real world. > > Regards, > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Sipura 2100 is supposed to implement T.38 real-soon-now.
I've got a Multi-tech ATA with T.38 support on order on the theory that
Multitech has been making well regarded FAX modems for years and might know how
to actually do FAX reasonably well.
Jim
James H. Thompson
jht@lj.net
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Underwood
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:24 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ATA that actually work with T.38
Hi,
I am implementing T.38, and finding a problem getting boxes that work
with T.38 for testing. A lot (maybe most) ATAs now claim to support
T.38, but I'm finding a lot of these lie. I have one box here that just
crashes when it hears a fax tone. :-)
I'm looking for boxes known to implement T.38 properly, and which really
work in the real world.
Regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050218/e999b634/attachment.htm
asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com wrote:>> Is it only the ATA that has to be T.38 compatible or does Asterisk >> have to work with T.38 also? Does Asterisk support T.38? > Asterisk must have T38 support in order to recognize the signaling. > No it doesn't at this time.We're working on Fax as well and if I'm not mistaken, there is a mode where Asterisk doesn't have to know very much about T.38 to make it work. -- Andreas Sikkema Rits tele.com Van Vollenhovenstraat 3 3016 BE Rotterdam t: +31 (0)10 2245544 f: +31 (0)10 2245540
I install WebVmail today on a Fedora 2 box. I got the cgi script running etc and I get the login prompt. However, when I enter a mailbox and password, ie. 201 and 1234, I always get a message saying the login is incorrect. Any tips out there? Thanks Martin
asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com wrote:> For T.38 passthrough between RTP channels it doesn't need to know a > great deal. There are some pitfalls, though, due to dumbness > in the T.38 > spec. > > Are you actually working on this?Yes, well, with a lot of other things, so progress is erratic. I've got to solve some other problems first, but Asterisk T.38 pass through is the next major issue. -- Andreas Sikkema Rits tele.com Van Vollenhovenstraat 3 3016 BE Rotterdam t: +31 (0)10 2245544 f: +31 (0)10 2245540