Joe Baptista
2004-Jul-08 07:01 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Slackware 10.0 and asterisk and 2.4 vs 2.6
I'm installing the new Slackware 10.0 distribution - but not sure if i should go with the 2.4 kernal - which i think is the default install - or the new 2.6 kernal? anyone running * and slackware 10.0 with 2.6 kernal? thanks joe
Hello, I am running Asterisk on Slackware 10.0 with the 2.4 kernel(default kernel) and it is very happy. Don't see too much difference from 9.1 except for the fact that most of the binutils have been updated and several of them run differently now(top, ps, ...) Haven't tried the 2.6 kernel yet, but may try it later. MATT--- -----Original Message----- From: Joe Baptista [mailto:baptista@dot-god.com] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:01 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Slackware 10.0 and asterisk and 2.4 vs 2.6 I'm installing the new Slackware 10.0 distribution - but not sure if i should go with the 2.4 kernal - which i think is the default install - or the new 2.6 kernal? anyone running * and slackware 10.0 with 2.6 kernal? thanks joe _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Anton Tinchev
2004-Jul-08 17:09 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Slackware 10.0 and asterisk and 2.4 vs 2.6
Joe Baptista wrote:> I'm installing the new Slackware 10.0 distribution - but not sure if i > should go with the 2.4 kernal - which i think is the default install - or > the new 2.6 kernal? anyone running * and slackware 10.0 with 2.6 kernal? > > thanks > joe >Asterisk stable CVS with slack 10/2.4.25 custom kernel - it works rock stable