Nick Couchman
2009-Jul-07 12:05 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] Benchmarking GPL PV Drivers for Windows between0.9.11-pre13 and 0.10.0.69
Pasi, Thanks for putting that wiki page together for the dom0 kernels - it's something that has long been needed for pulling together information on those kernels. I know it's always a chore for me to find info on how to get/build a dom0 kernel if I don't like the one that's included with a distribution. Thanks! -Nick>>> On 2009/07/07 at 00:50, Pasi Kärkkäinen<pasik@iki.fi> wrote:On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:58:46PM -0400, jim burns wrote:> On Mon July 6 2009 11:00:28 am you wrote: > > > System: fc8 64bit, xen 3.1.2, xen.gz 3.1.4, dom0 2.6.21 > > > > Have you tried with a newer Xen and dom0 kernel? > > > > -- Pasi > > No. I'm a Fedora loyalist, since they are in the forefront of thepvops, and> thus the future, direction of Xen. Unfortunately, they still don'thave dom0> support yet, so I'm stuck with F8. (Interesting thread last month onthat -> 'Xen is a feature'/'Merge Xen (the hypervisor) into Linux'. Thanx towhoever> gated that into xen users.) It will be interesting to see if xen 3.4and a> pvops dom0 have any effect, tho'. > > This is also why I haven't really had a lot to say since last summer- nothing> much has changed for me! >Ok. Fedora 11 now has Xen 3.3.1 hypervisor and tools, and it will receive 3.4.1 shortly after it has been released upstream (rawhide already has 3.4.0). There are also pv_ops dom0 kernel RPMs for testing: http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ Also you might be interested of the wiki page I made yesterday: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenDom0Kernels I've been successfully using Fedora 10 and Fedora 11 with pv_ops dom0 myself.. there are still some bugs and issues, some bigger changes still need to be done to get accepted upstream, but it's already in a state where you can definitely beta test it :)> Nice to see you are still around!You too :) -- Pasi -------- This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor attributable to SEAKR. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-Jul-07 13:49 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] Benchmarking GPL PV Drivers for Windows between0.9.11-pre13 and 0.10.0.69
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 06:05:15AM -0600, Nick Couchman wrote:> Pasi, > Thanks for putting that wiki page together for the dom0 kernels - it''s > something that has long been needed for pulling together information on > those kernels. I know it''s always a chore for me to find info on how to > get/build a dom0 kernel if I don''t like the one that''s included with a > distribution. >Yep, that''s what I thought too :) Hopefully it helps people with dom0 kernels until pv_ops dom0 is merged upstream and available in vanilla kernels.. -- Pasi> Thanks! > -Nick > > >>> On 2009/07/07 at 00:50, Pasi Kärkkäinen<pasik@iki.fi> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:58:46PM -0400, jim burns wrote: > > On Mon July 6 2009 11:00:28 am you wrote: > > > > System: fc8 64bit, xen 3.1.2, xen.gz 3.1.4, dom0 2.6.21 > > > > > > Have you tried with a newer Xen and dom0 kernel? > > > > > > -- Pasi > > > > No. I''m a Fedora loyalist, since they are in the forefront of the > pvops, and > > thus the future, direction of Xen. Unfortunately, they still don''t > have dom0 > > support yet, so I''m stuck with F8. (Interesting thread last month on > that - > > ''Xen is a feature''/''Merge Xen (the hypervisor) into Linux''. Thanx to > whoever > > gated that into xen users.) It will be interesting to see if xen 3.4 > and a > > pvops dom0 have any effect, tho''. > > > > This is also why I haven''t really had a lot to say since last summer > - nothing > > much has changed for me! > > > > Ok. Fedora 11 now has Xen 3.3.1 hypervisor and tools, and it will > receive > 3.4.1 shortly after it has been released upstream (rawhide already has > 3.4.0). > > There are also pv_ops dom0 kernel RPMs for testing: > http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ > > Also you might be interested of the wiki page I made yesterday: > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenDom0Kernels > > I''ve been successfully using Fedora 10 and Fedora 11 with pv_ops dom0 > myself.. > there are still some bugs and issues, some bigger changes still need to > be > done to get accepted upstream, but it''s already in a state where you > can > definitely beta test it :) > > > Nice to see you are still around! > > You too :) > > -- Pasi > > > > > -------- > This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor attributable to SEAKR._______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users