Xen users - Jul 2005 - Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140

I''m getting subj trying to run linux-iscsi-4.0.2 on domain0.
I tried xen-2.0.6, xen-2-test and xen-3-devel. The same results.
I found similar complaints regarding this problem like below:

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.1/1622.html
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.1/1621.html

Not sure if it is xen or linux-iscsi related bug.
Any ideas how to cure it will be very appreciated.
--
Jul  6 15:20:32 iscsi-test1 kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at 
kernel/softirq.c:140
Jul  6 15:20:32 iscsi-test1 kernel:  [<c01205a4>]
local_bh_enable+0x68/0x83
Jul  6 15:20:32 iscsi-test1 kernel:  [<c8973742>]
iscsi_queuecommand+0x173/0x1e3
[iscsi_sfnet]
Jul  6 15:20:32 iscsi-test1 kernel:  [<c02c9e7f>]
scsi_dispatch_cmd+0x149/0x264
Jul  6 15:20:32 iscsi-test1 kernel:  [<c02ca0ee>] scsi_done+0x0/0x26
Jul  6 15:20:32 iscsi-test1 kernel:  [<c02cc8d0>] scsi_times_out+0x0/0xa0
Jul  6 15:20:32 iscsi-test1 kernel:  [<c02cfa40>]
scsi_request_fn+0x1fa/0x4ff
--

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

> Subject: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable at 
> kernel/softirq.c:140
> 
> I''m getting subj trying to run linux-iscsi-4.0.2 on domain0.
> I tried xen-2.0.6, xen-2-test and xen-3-devel. The same results.
> I found similar complaints regarding this problem like below:
> 
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.1/1622.html
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.1/1621.html
> 
> Not sure if it is xen or linux-iscsi related bug.
> Any ideas how to cure it will be very appreciated.
This is frequently a result of building an out-of-tree module without
specifying ARCH=xen

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

yep, disabling ARCH in Makefile and "make ARCH=xen" resolved this.
Thanks a lot!
>Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:49:05 +0100
>From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>
>To: "Igor Feoktistov" <igorf@netapp.com>,
<xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
>> 
>> Subject: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable at 
>> kernel/softirq.c:140
>> 
>> I''m getting subj trying to run linux-iscsi-4.0.2 on domain0.
>> I tried xen-2.0.6, xen-2-test and xen-3-devel. The same results.
>> I found similar complaints regarding this problem like below:
>> 
>> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.1/1622.html
>> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.1/1621.html
>> 
>> Not sure if it is xen or linux-iscsi related bug.
>> Any ideas how to cure it will be very appreciated.
>
>This is frequently a result of building an out-of-tree module without
>specifying ARCH=xen
>
>Ian
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-users mailing list
>Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users