thr3ads.net - Xen devel - PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3] [May 2013]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

2013-May-06 18:45 UTC

PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Which is probably the case b/c the Linux side implementation for
such simple operation as :

echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

would have blown up so nobody tested it?

Now that is fixed (v3.10 +
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-05/msg00503.html)
I tried to do ''xm vcpu-set latest X'' for a PVHVM guest.

The first iteration was using this simple guest config:
builder=''hvm''
disk = [ ''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
memory = 2048
boot="d"
maxvcpus=4
vcpus=4
serial=''pty''
vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
name="latest"
vif = [ ''mac=00:0F:4B:00:00:68, bridge=switch'' ]

And I tried simple combinations of ''x[m|l] vcpu-set latest
2|3|4'' and
none of them worked.

In Xen 4.1 (and Xen 4.3 if I
use:device_model_version="qemu-xen-traditional")
I saw that the qemu log does the right thing:
.. snip..
Remove vcpu 2
Remove vcpu 1

and the guest''s ACPI SCI is incrementing:
# cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
   9:          1          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
# cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
   9:          2          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi

But nothing looks to be happening. Where should I look?
The ACPI DSDT is a bit daunting. Has this ever worked in the past?
If so, what code ran to hotplug CPUs?

Ross Philipson

2013-May-07 00:07 UTC

head link

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-
> bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:45 AM
> To: jinsong.liu@intel.com; Stefano Stabellini; xen-
> devel@lists.xensource.com
> Subject: [Xen-devel] PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug
> doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]
> 
> Which is probably the case b/c the Linux side implementation for
> such simple operation as :
> 
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> 
> would have blown up so nobody tested it?
> 
> Now that is fixed (v3.10 + http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-
> devel/2013-05/msg00503.html)
> I tried to do ''xm vcpu-set latest X'' for a PVHVM guest.
> 
> The first iteration was using this simple guest config:
> builder=''hvm''
> disk = [
''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
> memory = 2048
> boot="d"
> maxvcpus=4
> vcpus=4
> serial=''pty''
> vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
> name="latest"
> vif = [ ''mac=00:0F:4B:00:00:68, bridge=switch'' ]
> 
> And I tried simple combinations of ''x[m|l] vcpu-set latest
2|3|4'' and
> none of them worked.
> 
> In Xen 4.1 (and Xen 4.3 if I use:device_model_version="qemu-xen-
> traditional")
> I saw that the qemu log does the right thing:
> .. snip..
> Remove vcpu 2
> Remove vcpu 1
> 
> and the guest''s ACPI SCI is incrementing:
> # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
>    9:          1          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
> # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
>    9:          2          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
> 
> But nothing looks to be happening. Where should I look?
> The ACPI DSDT is a bit daunting. Has this ever worked in the past?
> If so, what code ran to hotplug CPUs?
I am looking at qemu-traditional (I believe it is traditional
here: http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=qemu-xen-unstable.git;a=summary).

The code for raising the SCI for processor hotplug doesn''t
look quite right to me. This is the code I see in
qemu_cpu_add_remove:

    if (gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4) {
        qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 1);
        qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 0);
    }

I would expect the code to actually set the GPE status bit for
the GPE register in question (in this case bit 2 for _L02), maybe:

    if ((gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4)&&
        ((gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] & 4) == 0)) {
        gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] &= 4;
        qemu_irq_raise(sci_irq);
    }

I also don''t understand why it is raising the SCI as level and
then edge. That GPE is defined in the DSDT as level:

    /* Define GPE control method ''_L02''. */
    push_block("Scope", "\\_GPE");
    push_block("Method", "_L02");
    stmt("Return", "\\_SB.PRSC()");

Maybe look at how the PCI hotplug GPE''s occur (ACPI_PHP_GPE_BIT).
Without
setting a status register the SCI may just be going in the bit bucket.

Anyway hope this is helpful at all...

Ross
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Ross Philipson

2013-May-07 00:16 UTC

head link

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-
> bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Ross Philipson
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 5:07 PM
> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; jinsong.liu@intel.com; Stefano Stabellini;
> xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug
> doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-
> > bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:45 AM
> > To: jinsong.liu@intel.com; Stefano Stabellini; xen-
> > devel@lists.xensource.com
> > Subject: [Xen-devel] PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug
> > doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]
> >
> > Which is probably the case b/c the Linux side implementation for
> > such simple operation as :
> >
> > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> > echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> >
> > would have blown up so nobody tested it?
> >
> > Now that is fixed (v3.10 + http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-
> > devel/2013-05/msg00503.html)
> > I tried to do ''xm vcpu-set latest X'' for a PVHVM
guest.
> >
> > The first iteration was using this simple guest config:
> > builder=''hvm''
> > disk = [
''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
> > memory = 2048
> > boot="d"
> > maxvcpus=4
> > vcpus=4
> > serial=''pty''
> > vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
> > name="latest"
> > vif = [ ''mac=00:0F:4B:00:00:68, bridge=switch'' ]
> >
> > And I tried simple combinations of ''x[m|l] vcpu-set latest
2|3|4'' and
> > none of them worked.
> >
> > In Xen 4.1 (and Xen 4.3 if I use:device_model_version="qemu-xen-
> > traditional")
> > I saw that the qemu log does the right thing:
> > .. snip..
> > Remove vcpu 2
> > Remove vcpu 1
> >
> > and the guest''s ACPI SCI is incrementing:
> > # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
> >    9:          1          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
> > # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
> >    9:          2          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
> >
> > But nothing looks to be happening. Where should I look?
> > The ACPI DSDT is a bit daunting. Has this ever worked in the past?
> > If so, what code ran to hotplug CPUs?
> 
> I am looking at qemu-traditional (I believe it is traditional
> here: http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=qemu-xen-unstable.git;a=summary).
> 
> The code for raising the SCI for processor hotplug doesn''t
> look quite right to me. This is the code I see in
> qemu_cpu_add_remove:
> 
>     if (gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4) {
>         qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 1);
>         qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 0);
>     }
> 
> I would expect the code to actually set the GPE status bit for
> the GPE register in question (in this case bit 2 for _L02), maybe:
> 
>     if ((gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4)&&
>         ((gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] & 4) == 0)) {
>         gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] &= 4;
>         qemu_irq_raise(sci_irq);
>     }
> 
> I also don''t understand why it is raising the SCI as level and
> then edge. That GPE is defined in the DSDT as level:
> 
>     /* Define GPE control method ''_L02''. */
>     push_block("Scope", "\\_GPE");
>     push_block("Method", "_L02");
>     stmt("Return", "\\_SB.PRSC()");
> 
> Maybe look at how the PCI hotplug GPE''s occur (ACPI_PHP_GPE_BIT).
> Without
> setting a status register the SCI may just be going in the bit bucket.
> 
> Anyway hope this is helpful at all...
Never mind, I missed the calls above to enable_processor
and disable_processor which seem to be doing the right
thing (long day on a plane). My sample code above had a
type-o but g->gpe0_sts[0] |= 4; looks right.

I still don''t understand why it raises the SCI level then edge though.

Ross
> 
> Ross
> 
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Ian Campbell

2013-May-07 10:03 UTC

head link

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 19:45 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:> 
> And I tried simple combinations of ''x[m|l] vcpu-set latest
2|3|4'' and
> none of them worked.
ISTR this needing a particular kernel config option / module. acpi_hp or
something?

I may be thinking of PCI hotplug, so take that with a pinch of salt. 

Ian.

Stefano Stabellini

2013-May-07 11:35 UTC

head link

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

On Mon, 6 May 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:> Which is probably the case b/c the Linux side implementation for
> such simple operation as :
> 
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> 
> would have blown up so nobody tested it?
> 
> Now that is fixed (v3.10 +
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-05/msg00503.html)
> I tried to do ''xm vcpu-set latest X'' for a PVHVM guest.
> 
> The first iteration was using this simple guest config:
> builder=''hvm''
> disk = [
''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
> memory = 2048
> boot="d"
> maxvcpus=4
> vcpus=4
I think that you might have to set maxvcpus=4 and vcpus=2 if you want to
be able to hotplug a couple of more vcpus (the last two in this case).

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

2013-May-07 13:21 UTC

head link

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 12:35:42PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:> On Mon, 6 May 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Which is probably the case b/c the Linux side implementation for
> > such simple operation as :
> > 
> > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> > echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> > 
> > would have blown up so nobody tested it?
> > 
> > Now that is fixed (v3.10 +
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-05/msg00503.html)
> > I tried to do ''xm vcpu-set latest X'' for a PVHVM
guest.
> > 
> > The first iteration was using this simple guest config:
> > builder=''hvm''
> > disk = [
''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
> > memory = 2048
> > boot="d"
> > maxvcpus=4
> > vcpus=4
> 
> I think that you might have to set maxvcpus=4 and vcpus=2 if you want to
> be able to hotplug a couple of more vcpus (the last two in this case).
Did that too. It did not work.

Right now I am just trying to de-plug the VCPUs to see if that works. Figured
that tearing down is easier than adding things in.

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

2013-May-07 19:46 UTC

head link

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 12:16:25AM +0000, Ross Philipson
wrote:> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-
> > bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Ross Philipson
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 5:07 PM
> > To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; jinsong.liu@intel.com; Stefano Stabellini;
> > xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug
> > doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-
> > > bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:45 AM
> > > To: jinsong.liu@intel.com; Stefano Stabellini; xen-
> > > devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > Subject: [Xen-devel] PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI
hotplug
> > > doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]
> > >
> > > Which is probably the case b/c the Linux side implementation for
> > > such simple operation as :
> > >
> > > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> > > echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> > >
> > > would have blown up so nobody tested it?
> > >
> > > Now that is fixed (v3.10 +
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-
> > > devel/2013-05/msg00503.html)
> > > I tried to do ''xm vcpu-set latest X'' for a
PVHVM guest.
> > >
> > > The first iteration was using this simple guest config:
> > > builder=''hvm''
> > > disk = [
''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
> > > memory = 2048
> > > boot="d"
> > > maxvcpus=4
> > > vcpus=4
> > > serial=''pty''
> > > vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
> > > name="latest"
> > > vif = [ ''mac=00:0F:4B:00:00:68, bridge=switch''
]
> > >
> > > And I tried simple combinations of ''x[m|l] vcpu-set
latest 2|3|4'' and
> > > none of them worked.
> > >
> > > In Xen 4.1 (and Xen 4.3 if I
use:device_model_version="qemu-xen-
> > > traditional")
> > > I saw that the qemu log does the right thing:
> > > .. snip..
> > > Remove vcpu 2
> > > Remove vcpu 1
> > >
> > > and the guest''s ACPI SCI is incrementing:
> > > # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
> > >    9:          1          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
> > > # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
> > >    9:          2          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
> > >
> > > But nothing looks to be happening. Where should I look?
> > > The ACPI DSDT is a bit daunting. Has this ever worked in the
past?
> > > If so, what code ran to hotplug CPUs?
> > 
> > I am looking at qemu-traditional (I believe it is traditional
> > here:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=qemu-xen-unstable.git;a=summary).
> > 
> > The code for raising the SCI for processor hotplug doesn''t
> > look quite right to me. This is the code I see in
> > qemu_cpu_add_remove:
> > 
> >     if (gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4) {
> >         qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 1);
> >         qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 0);
> >     }
> > 
> > I would expect the code to actually set the GPE status bit for
> > the GPE register in question (in this case bit 2 for _L02), maybe:
> > 
> >     if ((gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4)&&
> >         ((gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] & 4) == 0)) {
> >         gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] &= 4;
> >         qemu_irq_raise(sci_irq);
> >     }
> > 
> > I also don''t understand why it is raising the SCI as level
and
> > then edge. That GPE is defined in the DSDT as level:
> > 
> >     /* Define GPE control method ''_L02''. */
> >     push_block("Scope", "\\_GPE");
> >     push_block("Method", "_L02");
> >     stmt("Return", "\\_SB.PRSC()");
> > 
> > Maybe look at how the PCI hotplug GPE''s occur
(ACPI_PHP_GPE_BIT).
> > Without
> > setting a status register the SCI may just be going in the bit bucket.
> > 
> > Anyway hope this is helpful at all...
> 
> Never mind, I missed the calls above to enable_processor
> and disable_processor which seem to be doing the right
> thing (long day on a plane). My sample code above had a
> type-o but g->gpe0_sts[0] |= 4; looks right.
> 
> I still don''t understand why it raises the SCI level then edge
though.
Neither do I but it actually looks to work. The problem I had was that
the $@$@#( generic hotplug code has a race, which means that udev
never ends up onlining the CPU (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/30/198)
So it looks like the CPU nevers gets onlined - and it did not until
I manually wrote a script to online the CPUs.

Now it can online, albeit I am hitting another bug <sigh>:

[   41.465296] CPU 1 got hotplugged
[   41.469607] installing Xen timer for CPU 1
[   41.475935] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
[   41.483014] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code
[   41.499193] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x4
[   41.517099] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   41.519532] kernel BUG at
/home/konrad/ssd/konrad/linux/arch/x86/xen/time.c:337!
[   41.519532] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[   41.519532] Modules linked in: dm_multipath dm_mod iscsi_boot_sysfs iscsi_tcp
libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi libcrc32c crc32c sg sr_mod cdrom
ata_generic crc32c_intel ata_piix libata scsi_mod xen_blkfront xen_netfront
fb_sys_fops sysimgblt sysfillrect syscopyarea xen_kbdfront xenfs xen_privcmd
[   41.519532] CPU 1
[   41.519532] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted
3.9.0upstream-00022-g49c1bf1-dirty #3 Xen HVM domU
[   41.519532] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81044f5c>]  [<ffffffff81044f5c>]
xen_vcpuop_set_mode+0x3c/0x80
[   41.519532] RSP: 0000:ffff880074467db8  EFLAGS: 00010082
[   41.519532] RAX: ffffffffffffffea RBX: ffff880074a2be40 RCX: 0000000000000001
[   41.519532] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000009
[   41.519532] RBP: ffff880074467db8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[   41.519532] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001
[   41.519532] R13: 0000000000000082 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000082
[   41.519532] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880074a20000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[   41.519532] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   41.519532] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000001c0c000 CR4: 00000000000406e0
[   41.519532] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[   41.519532] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[   41.519532] Process swapper/1 (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff880074466000, task
ffff880074464300)
[   41.519532] Stack:
[   41.519532]  ffff880074467dd8 ffffffff810e8385 ffff880074a2be40
ffff880074a2be40
[   41.519532]  ffff880074467df8 ffffffff810e83e6 ffff880074467df8
0000000000000000
[   41.519532]  ffff880074467e28 ffffffff810e84b7 ffffffff810e8ae4
ffff880074a2be40
[   41.519532] Call Trace:
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8385>] clockevents_set_mode+0x25/0x70
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e83e6>] clockevents_shutdown+0x16/0x30
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e84b7>]
clockevents_exchange_device+0xb7/0x110
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8ae4>] ? tick_notify+0x114/0x420
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8b99>] tick_notify+0x1c9/0x420
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8221>] ?
clockevents_register_device+0x31/0x170
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8169dd9d>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810be851>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e82d0>]
clockevents_register_device+0xe0/0x170
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8104502c>] xen_setup_cpu_clockevents+0x2c/0x50
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff81045066>]
xen_hvm_setup_cpu_clockevents+0x16/0x20
[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8168d48f>] start_secondary+0x1ea/0x1f9
[   41.519532] Code: 73 2d 48 63 c9 bf 09 00 00 00 31 d2 48 89 ce e8 bb c3 fb ff
85 c0 75 13 bf 07 00 00 00 48 89 ce 31 d2 e8 a8 c3 fb ff 85 c0 74 09 <0f>
0b eb fe 83 ff 03 74 02 c9 c3 bf 07 00 00 00 48 63 f1 31 d2
[   41.519532] RIP  [<ffffffff81044f5c>] xen_vcpuop_set_mode+0x3c/0x80
[   41.519532]  RSP <ffff880074467db8>
[   41.519532] ---[ end trace a182694869545b1a ]---
[   41.519532] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!

Thought this is using xend, as you cannot in xl have maxvcpus != vcpus.

For reference this is the guest config:

builder=''hvm''
device_model_version = ''qemu-xen-traditional''
disk = [ ''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
memory = 2048
boot="d"
maxvcpus=32
vcpus=1
serial=''pty''
vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
name="latest"
vif = [ ''mac=00:0F:4B:00:00:68, bridge=switch'' ]

Stefano Stabellini

2013-May-08 11:14 UTC

head link

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

On Tue, 7 May 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 12:16:25AM +0000, Ross Philipson wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-
> > > bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Ross Philipson
> > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 5:07 PM
> > > To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; jinsong.liu@intel.com; Stefano
Stabellini;
> > > xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI
hotplug
> > > doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-
> > > > bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:45 AM
> > > > To: jinsong.liu@intel.com; Stefano Stabellini; xen-
> > > > devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > > Subject: [Xen-devel] PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI
hotplug
> > > > doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]
> > > >
> > > > Which is probably the case b/c the Linux side implementation
for
> > > > such simple operation as :
> > > >
> > > > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> > > > echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
> > > >
> > > > would have blown up so nobody tested it?
> > > >
> > > > Now that is fixed (v3.10 +
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-
> > > > devel/2013-05/msg00503.html)
> > > > I tried to do ''xm vcpu-set latest X'' for a
PVHVM guest.
> > > >
> > > > The first iteration was using this simple guest config:
> > > > builder=''hvm''
> > > > disk = [
''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
> > > > memory = 2048
> > > > boot="d"
> > > > maxvcpus=4
> > > > vcpus=4
> > > > serial=''pty''
> > > > vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
> > > > name="latest"
> > > > vif = [ ''mac=00:0F:4B:00:00:68,
bridge=switch'' ]
> > > >
> > > > And I tried simple combinations of ''x[m|l] vcpu-set
latest 2|3|4'' and
> > > > none of them worked.
> > > >
> > > > In Xen 4.1 (and Xen 4.3 if I
use:device_model_version="qemu-xen-
> > > > traditional")
> > > > I saw that the qemu log does the right thing:
> > > > .. snip..
> > > > Remove vcpu 2
> > > > Remove vcpu 1
> > > >
> > > > and the guest''s ACPI SCI is incrementing:
> > > > # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
> > > >    9:          1          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi  
acpi
> > > > # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
> > > >    9:          2          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi  
acpi
> > > >
> > > > But nothing looks to be happening. Where should I look?
> > > > The ACPI DSDT is a bit daunting. Has this ever worked in the
past?
> > > > If so, what code ran to hotplug CPUs?
> > > 
> > > I am looking at qemu-traditional (I believe it is traditional
> > > here:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=qemu-xen-unstable.git;a=summary).
> > > 
> > > The code for raising the SCI for processor hotplug
doesn''t
> > > look quite right to me. This is the code I see in
> > > qemu_cpu_add_remove:
> > > 
> > >     if (gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4) {
> > >         qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 1);
> > >         qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 0);
> > >     }
> > > 
> > > I would expect the code to actually set the GPE status bit for
> > > the GPE register in question (in this case bit 2 for _L02),
maybe:
> > > 
> > >     if ((gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4)&&
> > >         ((gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] & 4) == 0)) {
> > >         gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] &= 4;
> > >         qemu_irq_raise(sci_irq);
> > >     }
> > > 
> > > I also don''t understand why it is raising the SCI as
level and
> > > then edge. That GPE is defined in the DSDT as level:
> > > 
> > >     /* Define GPE control method ''_L02''. */
> > >     push_block("Scope", "\\_GPE");
> > >     push_block("Method", "_L02");
> > >     stmt("Return", "\\_SB.PRSC()");
> > > 
> > > Maybe look at how the PCI hotplug GPE''s occur
(ACPI_PHP_GPE_BIT).
> > > Without
> > > setting a status register the SCI may just be going in the bit
bucket.
> > > 
> > > Anyway hope this is helpful at all...
> > 
> > Never mind, I missed the calls above to enable_processor
> > and disable_processor which seem to be doing the right
> > thing (long day on a plane). My sample code above had a
> > type-o but g->gpe0_sts[0] |= 4; looks right.
> > 
> > I still don''t understand why it raises the SCI level then
edge though.
> 
> Neither do I but it actually looks to work. The problem I had was that
> the $@$@#( generic hotplug code has a race, which means that udev
> never ends up onlining the CPU (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/30/198)
> So it looks like the CPU nevers gets onlined - and it did not until
> I manually wrote a script to online the CPUs.
> 
> Now it can online, albeit I am hitting another bug <sigh>:
> 
> [   41.465296] CPU 1 got hotplugged
> [   41.469607] installing Xen timer for CPU 1
> [   41.475935] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
> [   41.483014] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code
> [   41.499193] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x4
> [   41.517099] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   41.519532] kernel BUG at
/home/konrad/ssd/konrad/linux/arch/x86/xen/time.c:337!
> [   41.519532] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [   41.519532] Modules linked in: dm_multipath dm_mod iscsi_boot_sysfs
iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi libcrc32c crc32c sg sr_mod
cdrom ata_generic crc32c_intel ata_piix libata scsi_mod xen_blkfront
xen_netfront fb_sys_fops sysimgblt sysfillrect syscopyarea xen_kbdfront xenfs
xen_privcmd
> [   41.519532] CPU 1
> [   41.519532] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted
3.9.0upstream-00022-g49c1bf1-dirty #3 Xen HVM domU
> [   41.519532] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81044f5c>] 
[<ffffffff81044f5c>] xen_vcpuop_set_mode+0x3c/0x80
> [   41.519532] RSP: 0000:ffff880074467db8  EFLAGS: 00010082
> [   41.519532] RAX: ffffffffffffffea RBX: ffff880074a2be40 RCX:
0000000000000001
> [   41.519532] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI:
0000000000000009
> [   41.519532] RBP: ffff880074467db8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
0000000000000000
> [   41.519532] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000001 R12:
0000000000000001
> [   41.519532] R13: 0000000000000082 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
0000000000000082
> [   41.519532] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880074a20000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
> [   41.519532] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [   41.519532] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000001c0c000 CR4:
00000000000406e0
> [   41.519532] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
> [   41.519532] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
> [   41.519532] Process swapper/1 (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff880074466000, task
ffff880074464300)
> [   41.519532] Stack:
> [   41.519532]  ffff880074467dd8 ffffffff810e8385 ffff880074a2be40
ffff880074a2be40
> [   41.519532]  ffff880074467df8 ffffffff810e83e6 ffff880074467df8
0000000000000000
> [   41.519532]  ffff880074467e28 ffffffff810e84b7 ffffffff810e8ae4
ffff880074a2be40
> [   41.519532] Call Trace:
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8385>] clockevents_set_mode+0x25/0x70
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e83e6>] clockevents_shutdown+0x16/0x30
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e84b7>]
clockevents_exchange_device+0xb7/0x110
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8ae4>] ? tick_notify+0x114/0x420
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8b99>] tick_notify+0x1c9/0x420
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8221>] ?
clockevents_register_device+0x31/0x170
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8169dd9d>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810be851>]
raw_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e82d0>]
clockevents_register_device+0xe0/0x170
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8104502c>]
xen_setup_cpu_clockevents+0x2c/0x50
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff81045066>]
xen_hvm_setup_cpu_clockevents+0x16/0x20
> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8168d48f>] start_secondary+0x1ea/0x1f9
> [   41.519532] Code: 73 2d 48 63 c9 bf 09 00 00 00 31 d2 48 89 ce e8 bb c3
fb ff 85 c0 75 13 bf 07 00 00 00 48 89 ce 31 d2 e8 a8 c3 fb ff 85 c0 74 09
<0f> 0b eb fe 83 ff 03 74 02 c9 c3 bf 07 00 00 00 48 63 f1 31 d2
> [   41.519532] RIP  [<ffffffff81044f5c>]
xen_vcpuop_set_mode+0x3c/0x80
> [   41.519532]  RSP <ffff880074467db8>
> [   41.519532] ---[ end trace a182694869545b1a ]---
> [   41.519532] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
> 
> Thought this is using xend, as you cannot in xl have maxvcpus != vcpus.
> 
> For reference this is the guest config:
> 
> builder=''hvm''
> device_model_version = ''qemu-xen-traditional''
> disk = [
''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
> memory = 2048
> boot="d"
> maxvcpus=32
> vcpus=1
> serial=''pty''
> vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
> name="latest"
> vif = [ ''mac=00:0F:4B:00:00:68, bridge=switch'' ]
> 
This needs more investigating but it is possible that cpu hotplug is
broken in xl. This should be considered a regression.

George Dunlap

2013-May-08 13:43 UTC

head link

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

On 08/05/13 12:14, Stefano Stabellini wrote:> On Tue, 7 May 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 12:16:25AM +0000, Ross Philipson wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-
>>>> bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Ross Philipson
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 5:07 PM
>>>> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; jinsong.liu@intel.com; Stefano
Stabellini;
>>>> xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI
hotplug
>>>> doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel-
>>>>> bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:45 AM
>>>>> To: jinsong.liu@intel.com; Stefano Stabellini; xen-
>>>>> devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI
hotplug
>>>>> doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is probably the case b/c the Linux side
implementation for
>>>>> such simple operation as :
>>>>>
>>>>> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
>>>>> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
>>>>>
>>>>> would have blown up so nobody tested it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that is fixed (v3.10 +
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-
>>>>> devel/2013-05/msg00503.html)
>>>>> I tried to do ''xm vcpu-set latest X'' for
a PVHVM guest.
>>>>>
>>>>> The first iteration was using this simple guest config:
>>>>> builder=''hvm''
>>>>> disk = [
''file:/mnt/lab/latest/root_image.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'']
>>>>> memory = 2048
>>>>> boot="d"
>>>>> maxvcpus=4
>>>>> vcpus=4
>>>>> serial=''pty''
>>>>> vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
>>>>> name="latest"
>>>>> vif = [ ''mac=00:0F:4B:00:00:68,
bridge=switch'' ]
>>>>>
>>>>> And I tried simple combinations of ''x[m|l]
vcpu-set latest 2|3|4'' and
>>>>> none of them worked.
>>>>>
>>>>> In Xen 4.1 (and Xen 4.3 if I
use:device_model_version="qemu-xen-
>>>>> traditional")
>>>>> I saw that the qemu log does the right thing:
>>>>> .. snip..
>>>>> Remove vcpu 2
>>>>> Remove vcpu 1
>>>>>
>>>>> and the guest''s ACPI SCI is incrementing:
>>>>> # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
>>>>>     9:          1          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi  
acpi
>>>>> # cat /proc/interrupts  |grep acpi
>>>>>     9:          2          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi  
acpi
>>>>>
>>>>> But nothing looks to be happening. Where should I look?
>>>>> The ACPI DSDT is a bit daunting. Has this ever worked in
the past?
>>>>> If so, what code ran to hotplug CPUs?
>>>> I am looking at qemu-traditional (I believe it is traditional
>>>> here:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=qemu-xen-unstable.git;a=summary).
>>>>
>>>> The code for raising the SCI for processor hotplug
doesn''t
>>>> look quite right to me. This is the code I see in
>>>> qemu_cpu_add_remove:
>>>>
>>>>      if (gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4) {
>>>>          qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 1);
>>>>          qemu_set_irq(sci_irq, 0);
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> I would expect the code to actually set the GPE status bit for
>>>> the GPE register in question (in this case bit 2 for _L02),
maybe:
>>>>
>>>>      if ((gpe_state.gpe0_en[0] & 4)&&
>>>>          ((gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] & 4) == 0)) {
>>>>          gpe_state.gpe0_sts[0] &= 4;
>>>>          qemu_irq_raise(sci_irq);
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> I also don''t understand why it is raising the SCI as
level and
>>>> then edge. That GPE is defined in the DSDT as level:
>>>>
>>>>      /* Define GPE control method ''_L02''. */
>>>>      push_block("Scope", "\\_GPE");
>>>>      push_block("Method", "_L02");
>>>>      stmt("Return", "\\_SB.PRSC()");
>>>>
>>>> Maybe look at how the PCI hotplug GPE''s occur
(ACPI_PHP_GPE_BIT).
>>>> Without
>>>> setting a status register the SCI may just be going in the bit
bucket.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway hope this is helpful at all...
>>> Never mind, I missed the calls above to enable_processor
>>> and disable_processor which seem to be doing the right
>>> thing (long day on a plane). My sample code above had a
>>> type-o but g->gpe0_sts[0] |= 4; looks right.
>>>
>>> I still don''t understand why it raises the SCI level then
edge though.
>> Neither do I but it actually looks to work. The problem I had was that
>> the $@$@#( generic hotplug code has a race, which means that udev
>> never ends up onlining the CPU (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/30/198)
>> So it looks like the CPU nevers gets onlined - and it did not until
>> I manually wrote a script to online the CPUs.
>>
>> Now it can online, albeit I am hitting another bug <sigh>:
>>
>> [   41.465296] CPU 1 got hotplugged
>> [   41.469607] installing Xen timer for CPU 1
>> [   41.475935] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
>> [   41.483014] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code
>> [   41.499193] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x4
>> [   41.517099] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [   41.519532] kernel BUG at
/home/konrad/ssd/konrad/linux/arch/x86/xen/time.c:337!
>> [   41.519532] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> [   41.519532] Modules linked in: dm_multipath dm_mod iscsi_boot_sysfs
iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi libcrc32c crc32c sg sr_mod
cdrom ata_generic crc32c_intel ata_piix libata scsi_mod xen_blkfront
xen_netfront fb_sys_fops sysimgblt sysfillrect syscopyarea xen_kbdfront xenfs
xen_privcmd
>> [   41.519532] CPU 1
>> [   41.519532] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted
3.9.0upstream-00022-g49c1bf1-dirty #3 Xen HVM domU
>> [   41.519532] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81044f5c>] 
[<ffffffff81044f5c>] xen_vcpuop_set_mode+0x3c/0x80
>> [   41.519532] RSP: 0000:ffff880074467db8  EFLAGS: 00010082
>> [   41.519532] RAX: ffffffffffffffea RBX: ffff880074a2be40 RCX:
0000000000000001
>> [   41.519532] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI:
0000000000000009
>> [   41.519532] RBP: ffff880074467db8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
0000000000000000
>> [   41.519532] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000001 R12:
0000000000000001
>> [   41.519532] R13: 0000000000000082 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
0000000000000082
>> [   41.519532] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880074a20000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [   41.519532] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [   41.519532] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000001c0c000 CR4:
00000000000406e0
>> [   41.519532] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
>> [   41.519532] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
>> [   41.519532] Process swapper/1 (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff880074466000,
task ffff880074464300)
>> [   41.519532] Stack:
>> [   41.519532]  ffff880074467dd8 ffffffff810e8385 ffff880074a2be40
ffff880074a2be40
>> [   41.519532]  ffff880074467df8 ffffffff810e83e6 ffff880074467df8
0000000000000000
>> [   41.519532]  ffff880074467e28 ffffffff810e84b7 ffffffff810e8ae4
ffff880074a2be40
>> [   41.519532] Call Trace:
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8385>]
clockevents_set_mode+0x25/0x70
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e83e6>]
clockevents_shutdown+0x16/0x30
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e84b7>]
clockevents_exchange_device+0xb7/0x110
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8ae4>] ? tick_notify+0x114/0x420
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8b99>] tick_notify+0x1c9/0x420
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8221>] ?
clockevents_register_device+0x31/0x170
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8169dd9d>]
notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810be851>]
raw_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e82d0>]
clockevents_register_device+0xe0/0x170
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8104502c>]
xen_setup_cpu_clockevents+0x2c/0x50
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff81045066>]
xen_hvm_setup_cpu_clockevents+0x16/0x20
>> [   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8168d48f>] start_secondary+0x1ea/0x1f9
>> [   41.519532] Code: 73 2d 48 63 c9 bf 09 00 00 00 31 d2 48 89 ce e8 bb
c3 fb ff 85 c0 75 13 bf 07 00 00 00 48 89 ce 31 d2 e8 a8 c3 fb ff 85 c0 74 09
<0f> 0b eb fe 83 ff 03 74 02 c9 c3 bf 07 00 00 00 48 63 f1 31 d2
>> [   41.519532] RIP  [<ffffffff81044f5c>]
xen_vcpuop_set_mode+0x3c/0x80
>> [   41.519532]  RSP <ffff880074467db8>
>> [   41.519532] ---[ end trace a182694869545b1a ]---
>> [   41.519532] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle
task!
>>
>> Thought this is using xend, as you cannot in xl have maxvcpus != vcpus.
Did you mean maxvcpus != vcpus, or maxvcpus > pcpus?

  -George

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

2013-May-08 16:23 UTC

head link

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

> >>[   41.517099] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>[   41.519532] kernel BUG at
/home/konrad/ssd/konrad/linux/arch/x86/xen/time.c:337!
> >>[   41.519532] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> >>[   41.519532] Modules linked in: dm_multipath dm_mod
iscsi_boot_sysfs iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi libcrc32c
crc32c sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic crc32c_intel ata_piix libata scsi_mod
xen_blkfront xen_netfront fb_sys_fops sysimgblt sysfillrect syscopyarea
xen_kbdfront xenfs xen_privcmd
> >>[   41.519532] CPU 1
> >>[   41.519532] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted
3.9.0upstream-00022-g49c1bf1-dirty #3 Xen HVM domU
> >>[   41.519532] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81044f5c>] 
[<ffffffff81044f5c>] xen_vcpuop_set_mode+0x3c/0x80
> >>[   41.519532] RSP: 0000:ffff880074467db8  EFLAGS: 00010082
> >>[   41.519532] RAX: ffffffffffffffea RBX: ffff880074a2be40 RCX:
0000000000000001
> >>[   41.519532] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI:
0000000000000009
> >>[   41.519532] RBP: ffff880074467db8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:
0000000000000000
> >>[   41.519532] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000001 R12:
0000000000000001
> >>[   41.519532] R13: 0000000000000082 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
0000000000000082
> >>[   41.519532] FS:  0000000000000000(0000)
GS:ffff880074a20000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> >>[   41.519532] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> >>[   41.519532] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000001c0c000 CR4:
00000000000406e0
> >>[   41.519532] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
> >>[   41.519532] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
> >>[   41.519532] Process swapper/1 (pid: 0, threadinfo
ffff880074466000, task ffff880074464300)
> >>[   41.519532] Stack:
> >>[   41.519532]  ffff880074467dd8 ffffffff810e8385 ffff880074a2be40
ffff880074a2be40
> >>[   41.519532]  ffff880074467df8 ffffffff810e83e6 ffff880074467df8
0000000000000000
> >>[   41.519532]  ffff880074467e28 ffffffff810e84b7 ffffffff810e8ae4
ffff880074a2be40
> >>[   41.519532] Call Trace:
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8385>]
clockevents_set_mode+0x25/0x70
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e83e6>]
clockevents_shutdown+0x16/0x30
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e84b7>]
clockevents_exchange_device+0xb7/0x110
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8ae4>] ?
tick_notify+0x114/0x420
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8b99>] tick_notify+0x1c9/0x420
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e8221>] ?
clockevents_register_device+0x31/0x170
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8169dd9d>]
notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810be851>]
raw_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff810e82d0>]
clockevents_register_device+0xe0/0x170
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8104502c>]
xen_setup_cpu_clockevents+0x2c/0x50
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff81045066>]
xen_hvm_setup_cpu_clockevents+0x16/0x20
> >>[   41.519532]  [<ffffffff8168d48f>]
start_secondary+0x1ea/0x1f9
> >>[   41.519532] Code: 73 2d 48 63 c9 bf 09 00 00 00 31 d2 48 89 ce
e8 bb c3 fb ff 85 c0 75 13 bf 07 00 00 00 48 89 ce 31 d2 e8 a8 c3 fb ff 85 c0 74
09 <0f> 0b eb fe 83 ff 03 74 02 c9 c3 bf 07 00 00 00 48 63 f1 31 d2
> >>[   41.519532] RIP  [<ffffffff81044f5c>]
xen_vcpuop_set_mode+0x3c/0x80
> >>[   41.519532]  RSP <ffff880074467db8>
> >>[   41.519532] ---[ end trace a182694869545b1a ]---
> >>[   41.519532] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the
idle task!
> >>
> >>Thought this is using xend, as you cannot in xl have maxvcpus !=
vcpus.
> 
> Did you mean maxvcpus != vcpus, or maxvcpus > pcpus?
It is true either way from a boolean perspective :-)

In the past I couldn''t get maxvcpus != vcpus to work with xl, but that
seems
to have fixed itself. Then I ran in the maxvcpus != vcpus for which I had
posted a patch. The xen_vcpuop_set_mode shows up with maxvcpus != vcpus
(and it sometimes shows up as maxvcpus > pcpus).

However I seem to have run in two more issues:
 - QEMU''s updating the offline/online CPU races with ACPI causing it to
   online/offline some of the CPUS but not all.
 - The hypervisor''s vcpu id is different from what
''smp_processor_id()'' in the
   guest shows (that is the vcpu_set_mode above). This looks to be happening
   also with Xen 4.1.

Xen devel - May 2013 - PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn't work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]

Re: PVHVM VCPU hotplug mechanism via ACPI hotplug doesn''t work in Xen 4.[1, 2, 3]