On 27/08/2011 10:10, "Shriram Rajagopalan" <rshriram@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ian Jackson
<Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> wrote:
>> (xen-devel added to the CC)
>>
>> Carsten Schiers writes ("AW: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1.2 - when
?"):
>>> Hi Keir, did you intentionally left these out for 4.1.2?
>>>
>>> They improve usability of xl toolstack as xend replacement.
>>>
>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/0648846b4d17
>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/2ae357405850
>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/c2995f0555af
>>
>> I''m happy with all of these being backported.
>>
>> The first two apply cleanly to 4.1-testing. Keir, should I port them
>> across or do you have a clever backport script ?
>>
>> The last one, c2995f0555af, has conflicts. Carsten, would you care to
>> post a version against 4.1 ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
> Keir,
> I would like to backport the following fixes and patches related to Remus.
>
> 1. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/c8ae80a11d47
> 2. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/29d81623dc14
> 3. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/b04e57ec4671
> 4. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/62c0dfc9efbf
> 5. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/ecff559bf474
> 6. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/15fc211a13bf
>
> Patches 2-6 apply cleanly against 4.1-testing. Patch 1 does not apply
cleanly
> as it has some content that I didn''t post, but seems to have
gotten in while
> IanJ was committing it (something related to
> tools/python/xen/xm/messages/xen-xm.pot).
I''ll leave it to Ian Jackson to backport these if he agrees with your
choices.
-- Keir
> shriram
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel