Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: [Xen-users] Missing 3.2 binary install package

jim burns
2008-02-29T01:32:42Z

On Thursday 28 February 2008 09:56:41 am Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Failing that, I would
> suggest building the hypervisor or the kernel (whichever you don''t
> have) from the source tarballs on the xen.org website.  Vendors''
dom0
> kernels intended for 3.1 are generally useable with 3.2.

What are the limits here? Would the xen.gz 3.0.3 compiled with the dom0
kernel, such as found with Centos, work with the xen 3.2 tarball? I would
assume the compatibility code would let it work, but what features would
be unsupported/not functional? Thanx.