James Harper
2008-Feb-20 00:36 UTC
[Xen-devel] bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler and Xen 3.1
It appears that xen 3.2 has ''bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler''... if I wanted to convert some code back to 3.1, what call do I use instead? There is a bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler, but that takes a different number of parameters. Thanks James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2008-Feb-20 08:17 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler and Xen 3.1
Not sure what you mean? Isn''t that a kernel symbol? In which case it has nothing to do with a specific version of Xen itself. -- Keir On 20/2/08 00:36, "James Harper" <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au> wrote:> It appears that xen 3.2 has ''bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler''... > if I wanted to convert some code back to 3.1, what call do I use > instead? There is a bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler, but that takes a > different number of parameters. > > Thanks > > James > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
James Harper
2008-Feb-20 13:05 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler and Xen 3.1
> > Not sure what you mean? Isn''t that a kernel symbol? In which case ithas> nothing to do with a specific version of Xen itself. >Yes. My bad. It''s a function that appears to have been introduced sometime after 3.0.3 (which is around the level of the patches on the Debian kernels). I figured it out though. bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler appears to just be a helper function that does a EVTCHNOP_bind_interdomain followed by a bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler. The scsi passthrough backend now works against the Debian kernels (I just compiled it out of tree) and I have written a windows PV frontend driver for it - my tape drive is identified by windows, although if I try a firmware upgrade on it it gets a bit upset, and I''m at a different location to the tape drive so I can''t put a tape in to test further. James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel