Tristan Gingold
2006-Mar-10 16:23 UTC
[Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h
Hi, very small patch to prepare comming soon patches on ia64. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2006-Mar-10 16:34 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h
On 10 Mar 2006, at 16:23, Tristan Gingold wrote:> Hi, > > very small patch to prepare comming soon patches on ia64.Firstly, it belongs on the ia64-devel list and in the ia64-devel tree. Secondly, there''s little point checking in the trivial patch alone -- may as well bundle it into the patch that actually defines and implements do_physdev_op(). -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-Mar-10 17:29 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:> Declare do_physdev_op.What are the intended semantics of do_physdev_op? Cheers, Muli -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Hollis Blanchard
2006-Mar-10 17:51 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h
Keir Fraser wrote:> > On 10 Mar 2006, at 16:23, Tristan Gingold wrote: >> very small patch to prepare comming soon patches on ia64. > > Firstly, it belongs on the ia64-devel list and in the ia64-devel tree.I''m beginning to split out the arch-neutral changes we''ve made for PPC and intend to submit those individually to xen-devel so that each can be discussed as usual. Then once the changes we need are in, we can then drop in the whole xen/arch/ppc directory. With Tristan''s patch, which is to arch-neutral code, you seem to prefer it be part of the ia64 tree which you''ll then pull later. What if you don''t like some of their changes? Do you give them feedback only after they ask you to pull? In general I assumed that patches that affect arch-neutral code should be submitted to xen-devel; is that not the case? -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Tristan Gingold
2006-Mar-13 08:33 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h
Le Vendredi 10 Mars 2006 18:29, Muli Ben-Yehuda a écrit :> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > Declare do_physdev_op. > > What are the intended semantics of do_physdev_op?See arch/x86/physdev.c. It is mainly for interrupts. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel