hello, looks like lxr.xensource.com is not completed? nobody here takes care this site? regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
What is missing? -Kip On 5/17/05, aq <aquynh@gmail.com> wrote:> hello, > > looks like lxr.xensource.com is not completed? nobody here takes care this site? > > regards, > aq > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 5/18/05, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> wrote:> What is missing? > -Kip >for example, this dir is empty/non-existent: http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr-unstable/source/tools/?v=tools-xen-unstable or we should assume that unstable''s lxr will not be updated ? regards, aq> On 5/17/05, aq <aquynh@gmail.com> wrote: > > hello, > > > > looks like lxr.xensource.com is not completed? nobody here takes care this site? > > > > regards, > > aq > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Tools are there, the paths in lxr are just a little strange. The olls is at the root of the top-level tools tree, rather than being under unstable as it is in the real repository. If you look here: http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr-unstable/source/?v=tools-xen-unstable you should find them. a. On 5/18/05, aq <aquynh@gmail.com> wrote:> On 5/18/05, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> wrote: > > What is missing? > > -Kip > > > > for example, this dir is empty/non-existent: > http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr-unstable/source/tools/?v=tools-xen-unstable > > or we should assume that unstable''s lxr will not be updated ? > > regards, > aq > > > On 5/17/05, aq <aquynh@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hello, > > > > > > looks like lxr.xensource.com is not completed? nobody here takes care this site? > > > > > > regards, > > > aq > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xen-devel mailing list > > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 5/18/05, Andrew Warfield <andrew.warfield@gmail.com> wrote:> Tools are there, the paths in lxr are just a little strange. The olls > is at the root of the top-level tools tree, rather than being under > unstable as it is in the real repository. If you look here: > > http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr-unstable/source/?v=tools-xen-unstable > > you should find them. >i checked again, looks like you have just fixed all the links. it is allright now. the only problem is the -unstable is not updated very often. -- regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 07:27, aq wrote:> looks like lxr.xensource.com is not completed? nobody here takes care this site?We do monitor the top level and a selection of key pages, just not every single page.>http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr-unstable/source/tools/?v=tools-xen-unstableHow did you come by this URL - was it a link from another LXR page (in which case we need to fix it) or way it manually crafted? On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 08:20, aq wrote:> On 5/18/05, Andrew Warfield <andrew.warfield@gmail.com> wrote: > > Tools are there, the paths in lxr are just a little strange. The olls > > is at the root of the top-level tools tree, rather than being under > > unstable as it is in the real repository. If you look here: > > > > http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr-unstable/source/?v=tools-xen-unstable > > > > you should find them.This came from a desire from some developers to not have crosslinking between e.g. Xen and tools and Xen and Linux where similar symbols may used but aren''t related.> i checked again, looks like you have just fixed all the links. it is > allright now.Strange, no changes have been made during the course of this conversation.> the only problem is the -unstable is not updated very often.We run the updates weekly. I''m happy to increase the frequency of this if there is the demand. As ever, suggestions, fault reports, etc. are welcome. Regards, James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 10:43, James Bulpin wrote:> On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 07:27, aq wrote: > > looks like lxr.xensource.com is not completed? nobody here takes care this site? > > We do monitor the top level and a selection of key pages, just not every > single page. > > >http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr-unstable/source/tools/?v=tools-xen-unstable > > How did you come by this URL - was it a link from another LXR page (in > which case we need to fix it) or way it manually crafted?After chatting with Andy just now I''ll answer my own question. This link was probably a result of navigating to the tools directory of the xen (hypervisor only) tree (contains figlet) then clicking the "tools-xen-unstable" link. LXR always moves to the same path in the new tree (useful when comparing e.g. two versions of linux). As we are (ab)using LXR for various trees, a file or directory in one will not necessarily appear in the other, hence the error. Short of hacking the LXR code there isn''t much we can do about this. Anyone know of a more flexible web-based source code browser? Cheers, James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 18 May 2005 11:22:21 +0100, James Bulpin <james@xensource.com> wrote:> On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 10:43, James Bulpin wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 07:27, aq wrote: > > > looks like lxr.xensource.com is not completed? nobody here takes care this site? > > > > We do monitor the top level and a selection of key pages, just not every > > single page. > > > > >http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr-unstable/source/tools/?v=tools-xen-unstable > > > > How did you come by this URL - was it a link from another LXR page (in > > which case we need to fix it) or way it manually crafted? > > After chatting with Andy just now I''ll answer my own question. This link > was probably a result of navigating to the tools directory of the xen > (hypervisor only) tree (contains figlet) then clicking the > "tools-xen-unstable" link.yes, that is exactly how i got the broken links. but why you layout the code differently from the way it layouts when untar? i am used to lxr.linux.no, so i got confused when first seen lxr.xensource.com. perhaps layout it in normal way will solve this problem? about updating the site, i guess only -unstable needs to be updated often. -testing is more stable and needs to care less. -- regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 16:36, aq wrote:> but why you layout the code differently from the way it layouts when > untar? i am used to lxr.linux.no, so i got confused when first seen > lxr.xensource.com. perhaps layout it in normal way will solve this > problem?The layout isn''t really different, we just index different parts of the tree separately. LXR can only handle separate index domains as separate trees hence the view we get. The "normal way" at lxr.linux.no is fine if you just have linux trees. We *could* just index the whole of the -unstable or -testing release as a single large tree, including Xen, the tools, both linux versions, both BSD versions, but, as mentioned before, that crossreferences stuff that really doesn''t relate at the C symbol level.> about updating the site, i guess only -unstable needs to be updated > often. -testing is more stable and needs to care less.Good point. Let''s go with daily for -unstable and weekly for -testing. I''ll make the changes tomorrow. Cheers, James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel