Hello all, I need to install .Net Framework 1.1 (program dotnetfx.exe). I did not succeed. How can I do that ? Thank you for your help ___________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail r?invente le mail ! D?couvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface r?volutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
CHI Si-An <chi_sian@yahoo.fr> wrote:> I need to install .Net Framework 1.1 (program dotnetfx.exe). > I did not succeed. > > How can I do that ?You can't. Daniel
CHI Si-An <chi_sian@yahoo.fr> wrote:> With crossover then ?I don't know, but I doubt it. Daniel
Onwe should be able to run such programs without the benefits of wine. Install mono, Novell's opensource knockoff of .net. Let us know how it works out!
At 2006-07-11 13:48 +0300, David Baron wrote:>Onwe should be able to run such programs without the benefits of wine. >Install >mono, Novell's opensource knockoff of .net. > >Let us know how it works out! > > >_______________________________________________ >wine-users mailing list >wine-users@winehq.org >http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-usersThere are a number of programs that are only partially .NET. They use marshalling techniques to get from unmanaged to managed code. The attempt to divide programs into pure WIN32API, that can use wine and pure .NET that can use mono is likely to fail.
> > There are a number of programs that are only partially .NET. They use > marshalling techniques to get from unmanaged to managed code. The > attempt to divide programs into pure WIN32API, that can use wine and > pure .NET that can use mono is likely to fail.Anyone tried mono for Windows on wine? If that installs, .net framework 1.1 shouldnt be a Problem or am I wrong? Maybe asking on mono for native integration to wine would be a great Idea? Cya Legine
Adam Gibson <agibson@ptm.com> wrote:> I hope this is not true but I have a feeling that in another 2 years > wine might not be so useful for newer apps if .net does not run on it. > Mono will only go so far... There are too many developers currently > bypassing .net in parts of their code and hooking directly to windows > only DLLs or APIs.For one, .NET is quite close to working on wine ATM. Also, if things go as Mircosoft wants it, apps will be .NET only in the future. Of course, that is until Microsoft changes its mind yet again. Daniel