[PATCH v4 5/6] x86/insn: Extend error reporting from insn_fetch_from_user[_inatomic]()

Joerg Roedel
Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:11:40 -0000

The error reporting from the insn_fetch_from_user*() functions is not
very verbose. Extend it to include information on whether the linear
RIP could not be calculated or whether the memory access faulted.

This will be used in the SEV-ES code to propagate the correct
exception depending on what went wrong during instruction fetch.

Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/sev.c    |  8 ++++----
 arch/x86/kernel/umip.c   | 10 ++++------
 arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c |  8 ++++++--
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
index 475bbc1b3547..a7045a5a94ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
@@ -267,17 +267,17 @@ static int vc_fetch_insn_kernel(struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt,
 static enum es_result __vc_decode_user_insn(struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
 {
 	char buffer[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
-	int res;
+	int insn_bytes;

-	res = insn_fetch_from_user_inatomic(ctxt->regs, buffer);
-	if (!res) {
+	insn_bytes = insn_fetch_from_user_inatomic(ctxt->regs, buffer);
+	if (insn_bytes <= 0) {
 		ctxt->fi.vector     = X86_TRAP_PF;
 		ctxt->fi.error_code = X86_PF_INSTR | X86_PF_USER;
 		ctxt->fi.cr2        = ctxt->regs->ip;
 		return ES_EXCEPTION;
 	}

-	if (!insn_decode_from_regs(&ctxt->insn, ctxt->regs, buffer, res))
+	if (!insn_decode_from_regs(&ctxt->insn, ctxt->regs, buffer,
insn_bytes))
 		return ES_DECODE_FAILED;

 	if (ctxt->insn.immediate.got)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c b/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c
index 8daa70b0d2da..337178809c89 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c
@@ -346,14 +346,12 @@ bool fixup_umip_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!regs)
 		return false;

-	nr_copied = insn_fetch_from_user(regs, buf);
-
 	/*
-	 * The insn_fetch_from_user above could have failed if user code
-	 * is protected by a memory protection key. Give up on emulation
-	 * in such a case.  Should we issue a page fault?
+	 * Give up on emulation if fetching the instruction failed. Should we
+	 * issue a page fault or a #GP?
 	 */
-	if (!nr_copied)
+	nr_copied = insn_fetch_from_user(regs, buf);
+	if (nr_copied <= 0)
 		return false;

 	if (!insn_decode_from_regs(&insn, regs, buf, nr_copied))
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index 4eecb9c7c6a0..1b5cdf8b7a4e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -1451,6 +1451,8 @@ static int insn_get_effective_ip(struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long *ip)
  * Number of instruction bytes copied.
  *
  * 0 if nothing was copied.
+ *
+ * -EINVAL if the linear address of the instruction could not be calculated
  */
 int insn_fetch_from_user(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned char
buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE])
 {
@@ -1458,7 +1460,7 @@ int insn_fetch_from_user(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned
char buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE])
 	int not_copied;

 	if (insn_get_effective_ip(regs, &ip))
-		return 0;
+		return -EINVAL;

 	not_copied = copy_from_user(buf, (void __user *)ip, MAX_INSN_SIZE);

@@ -1479,6 +1481,8 @@ int insn_fetch_from_user(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned
char buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE])
  * Number of instruction bytes copied.
  *
  * 0 if nothing was copied.
+ *
+ * -EINVAL if the linear address of the instruction could not be calculated
  */
 int insn_fetch_from_user_inatomic(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned char
buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE])
 {
@@ -1486,7 +1490,7 @@ int insn_fetch_from_user_inatomic(struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned char buf[MAX_IN
 	int not_copied;

 	if (insn_get_effective_ip(regs, &ip))
-		return 0;
+		return -EINVAL;

 	not_copied = __copy_from_user_inatomic(buf, (void __user *)ip, MAX_INSN_SIZE);

--
2.31.1