[syslinux] ramdisk_size=9216 - but why?

Geert Stappers
Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:59:32 -0000

On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:30:53AM -0400, W. E. W. Russell
wrote:
> I'm just trying to document and optimize my setup which I moved from a
> RHEL5 server. I noticed that I have "ramdisk_size=9216", but
after a
> fruitless search online, I still don't understand why we chose 9MB - it
> seems so random. Many others have used this as well from my research, but
> no one ever states WHY.
>
> My questions are pretty simple:
>
> 1. Why would someone choose SPECIFICALLY ramdisk_size=9216 versus the
> default of 4096?
>
> 2. Is this something that I would need for the RHEL6 installs? Or is this a
> legacy thing for the RHEL5 installs?
>
> PS. I'm not having a particular issue, but trying to gain a better
> understanding for optimization. Maybe the number I should use should be
> bigger or smaller, but I'm hoping the members of this list can help me
> decide.


The Ram disk of an "installer" contains much more programs
then a regular ramdisk.


Cheers
Geert Stappers