similar to: help: calculations for causespecific hazard ratios in a competing risks analysis with timedependent covariates

Dear R users: Analysis of the impact of a time-dependent covariate (GVHD or use of steroid after bone marrow transplantation) on two competing endpoints (invasive fungal infection and death) is frequently encountered in the setting of BMT data. Coxph package can be used as the following: for the analysis of GVHD: > gvhd -> coxph(Surv(start,stop,status = =1) ~ GVHD, data=bmt.data)

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:55:19 +0100 r-help-request at r-project.org wrote: > Welcome to the R-help at r-project.org mailing list! > > To post to this list, send your email to: > > r-help at r-project.org > > General information about the mailing list is at: > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > > If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your

Hi All, I'm trying to figure out the cumulative incidence curve in R in some limited time. I found in package "cmprsk", the command "plot.cuminc" can get this curve. But I noticed that there is no mark for the censored time there, comparing with the KM curve by "plot.survfit". Here are my codes (attached is the data): ----------------

R 2.8.1 Windows XP I am trying to plot the results of a coxph using plot(survfit()). The plot should, I believe, show two lines one for survival in each of two treatment (Drug) groups, however my plot shows only one line. What am I doing wrong? My code is reproduced below, my figure is attached to this EMail message. John > #Create simple survival object >

Dear R-users Has anybody implemented a function/package that will compute an individual's risk of an event in the presence of competing risks, adjusted for the individual's covariates? The only thing that seems to come close is the cuminc function from cmprsk package, but I would like to adjust for more than one covariate (it allows you to stratify by a single grouping vector). Any

How can I model coxph() in combination with competing risks i.e. I have two events and for event the object will leave the data set. So : Coxph(Surv(time,event)~....) the event is for all my objects 1. How can I model this? Sharon ----------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION: The information in this electronic mail message is private and confidential, and only

Hello R-community, I want to generate stacked density plots in lattice. My data consist of a numeric variable ('pid') that is measured in different individuals ('id'), which can be divided in two types ('type') and the measurements were repeated a different time points ('day'). I read in the Lattice book that this can be done using the 'flowViz'

Hi R-Users, I posted this question a while ago on the bioconductor mailing list but got no answers. Maybe here is somebody who might know a solution: I failed at drawing multiple filters in a densityplot() using the FlowCore/FlowViz packages. I found a way to draw multiple filters in xyplot(), using the glpolygon method within the panel-function, but some similar attempts for densityplot

Hello R-users: I am using "yags" for fitting GEE which is giving me the same result as "Proc GENMOD". Now I have couple of questions related to yags output. (By the way, someone told me to run the geeglm for the same analysis and I did run but did not get the same result as of genmod and don't know how to correct the geeglm codes so that all three will be same!)

Dear R-Users: I am trying to find the robust (or sandwich) estimates of the standard error of fixed effects parameter estimates using the package "lmer2". In model-1, I used "robust=TRUE" on the other, in model-2, I used "robust=FALSE". Both models giving me the same estimates. So my question is, does the robust option works in lmer2 to get the robust estimates of

Dear R group: I am compiling a list of available algorithms/macros/software for performing the following types of competing risks analyses: (1) cumulative (crude) incidence regression (2) Gray's K-sample log-rank test for cmulative incidence (3) multi-state models (4) dependent competing risks modeling with (a) copulas, (b) Robin's Inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW)

Dear All, I have analysed time to event data for continuous variables by considering the multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) model and comparing this to the untransformed and log transformed model to determine which transformation, if any, is best. This was possible as the Cox model was the underlying model. However, I am now at the situation where the assumption that the competing risks

Dear R users, I used crr function in R package 'cmprsk' to fit a competing risks model. There were no any error or warning messages during running the function, but the output was obvious not correct. I saved the model fit as an object called f.crr. I extracted bfitj from the object by doing f.crr$bfitj, and found values of bfitj were extremely large (around 1e+138). I tried all

All, I am working with Emergency Department (ED) Length of Stay Data. The ED visit can end in one of a variety of ways (Admit, discharge, transfer, etc...) Initially, I have modeled the time to event by fitting a survival model to the time the outcome of interest and treat all other outcomes as censoring. However I recently came across the cmprsk package in R which seems to be developed

Dear R users, I am new to R and wanted to apply competing risk methods in my research work. I used the R code given by Zhang et al in his paper 'Nomogram for survival analysis in the presence of competing risks published in Ann Trans Med 2017:5(20):403. I am struggling with getting calibration curve thro' internal validation. I am happy to receive suggestion in the coding as well

Dear Raja, A Fine and Gray model can be fitted using the standard coxph function with weights that correct for right censoring and left truncation. Hence I guess any function that allows to perform stepwise regression with coxph should work. See e.g. my article in Biometrics https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01420.x, or the vignette "Multi-state models and competing risks" in the

Hi R users, I'd like to draw a nomogram using a competing-risks regression (crr function in R), rather than a cox regression. However, the nomogram function provided in the Design package is not good for this purpose. Do you have any suggestion. I really appreciate your help Many thanks F.Abdollah, MD San-Raffele hospital Milan, Italy -- View this message in context:

I am working on a competing risks problem, specifically an analysis of cause-specific mortality. I am familiar with the cmprsk package and have used it before to create cumulative incidence plots. I also came across an old (1998) s-news post from Dr. Terry Therneau describing a way to use coxph to model competing risks. I am re-producing the post at the bottom of this message. I would like to

Dear All, I would like to use R function 'selectFGR' of fine gray model in competing risks model. I used the 'Melanoma' data in 'riskRegression' package. Some of the variables are factor. I get solution for full model but not in variable selection model. Any advice how to use factor variable in 'selectFGR' function. The following R code is produced below

Hello, I have a question regarding competing risk regression using cmprsk package (function crr()). I am using R2.9.1. How can I do to assess the effect of qualitative predictor (gg) with more than two categories (a,b,c) categorie c is the reference category. See above results, gg is considered like a ordered predictor ! Thank you for your help Jan > # simulated data to test > set.seed(10)