similar to: Semantics of sequences in R

getnybble() needs to return four bits at a time from every byte. During rle decode, rows are rounded to an integer number of bytes. The rle length needs to be able to hold values > 255. Signed-off-by: Chas Williams <3chas3 at gmail.com> --- core/graphics.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/core/graphics.c

We recently have upgraded syslinux and have noticed that the boot logo code via boot.txt no longer works. I have a couple patches that get it close to working but I appear to be having trouble with color maps. Is there someone would want to help me finish figuring this out? Any interest in the patches I have to fix the rle decoder?

Dear All, Apologies if my questions are too basic for this list. I am given a set of data corresponding to list of detection times (real, non-integer numbers in general) for some events, let us say nuclear decays to fix the ideas. It is a small dataset, corresponding to about 400 nuclear decay times. I would like to test the hypothesis that these decay times are Poissonian-distributed. What is

I would like to import only datas of my table where DATE>today-7days. But my datas in Oracle are 'dates' and in R are 'characters'. now_7<-format(Sys.time()-(7*60*60*24), "%Y-%m-%d 00:00:00") How to do? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Compare-date-Oracle-with-Sys-time-tp4635624.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at

Dear list, I think I just stumbled across a bug in either 'relist()' and/or 'as.relistable()'. It seems that 'pairlists' can only be un- and relisted as long as they're not nested: Good: a <- as.relistable(as.pairlist(list(a=1, b=2))) a <- unlist(a) relist(a)# Works Bad: a <- as.relistable(as.pairlist(list(a=1, b=2, c=list(c.1=1, c.2=2)))) a <- unlist(a)

[markdown format] I'm glad to introduce you the new package aVirtualTwins. This package is an adaptation of VirtualTwins method of subgroup identification from [Foster, J. C., Taylor, J. M.G. and Ruberg, S. J. (2011)](http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.4322/abstract). ### Explanation Virtual Twins has been created to find subgroup of patients in a random clinical trial with

[markdown format] I'm glad to introduce you the new package aVirtualTwins. This package is an adaptation of VirtualTwins method of subgroup identification from [Foster, J. C., Taylor, J. M.G. and Ruberg, S. J. (2011)](http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.4322/abstract). ### Explanation Virtual Twins has been created to find subgroup of patients in a random clinical trial with

I would like to create a vector of pairlist (flag, binary_value) like: (variable ="TrendOff", value = 0) (variable ="MOdwt", value = 1) (variable ? "ZeroPadding", value =1) ................................................ I tried the following syntax but the emcompassing list (that I called "flags") is not made up of pairlists. Instead it

> -----Original Message----- > From: Luke Tierney [mailto:luke at stat.uiowa.edu] > R does not provide a pairlist data structure. This creates a dilemma > when translating some list-based xlispstat code, or, more > importantly, when implementing an algorithm for which parilists are > the natural data structure to use. > ... > Pairlists were and still are used internally

Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to eliminate the usage of pairlist from user code, which suggests the alternative of allowing for function arguments to be stored in lists. That's a much deeper change though. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > Michael, thanks for this info. > > I've stumbled upon

This code which has worked for years in R but fails under R-devel: > R.version.string [1] "R Under development (unstable) (2012-07-25 r59963)" > > n <- 3 > f <- function(x) {} > formals(f) <- rep(formals(f), n) ## Error in rep(formals(f), n) : replication of pairlists is defunct The message suggests that the change was intentional. Why was this functionality

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>>> on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:21:13 -0700 writes: > > > Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to > > eliminate the usage of pairlist from user code, which > >

Hi all, Does anyone have a comprehensive list of recursive-type objects in R? is.recursive defines them as by exclusion: "most types of objects are regarded as recursive, except for vector types, ?NULL? and symbols (as given by ?as.name?)." I think this that means recursive objects are: * lists * pairlists * calls * expressions Did I miss anything? Hadley -- Assistant

Dear R-devel, There is a new feature in R-devel, which explicitly refers to LISP @ operator for splicing. > The backquote function bquote() has a new argument splice to enable splicing a computed list of values into an expression, like ,@ in LISP's backquote. Although the most upvoted SO question asking for exactly LISP's @ functionality in R doesn't seems to be addressed by this

Hi Henrik, It would help to understand your use case for pairlists. Thanks, Michael On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Michael Lawrence <michafla at gene.com> wrote: > The coercion is probably the most viable workaround for now, as it's > consistent with what happens internally for calls. All pairlists/calls > are converted to list for subassignment, but only calls are

Hi, I seem to not be able to assign NULL to an element of a pairlist without causing it to be coerced to a plain list. For example: > x <- pairlist(1, 2) > class(x) [1] "pairlist" > x[1] <- list(NULL) > class(x) [1] "list" This actually true for all [()<- assignments regardless of list value, e.g. > x <- pairlist(1, 2) > x[1] <- list(0) [1]

Hi, ?pairlist gives no explanation about what exactly is the difference between a pairlist and a list (except that a pairlist of length 0 is 'NULL'). So, what's a pairlist? class(.Options) [1] "pairlist" Some strange things about the "pairlist" type: > showClass("pairlist") Error in getClass(Class) : "pairlist" is not a defined class

I'm trying to build up a list of data.frames by "appending" one by one. If x,y,z are data.frames, I can do somelist <- list(x, y, z) (or even somelist <- list(x=x, y=y, z=z) to get names) But if I start with somelist <- list(x,y) and now want to go from this to list(x,y,z) I'm stuck. I've tried append(somelist, z) c(somelist, z) list(somelist, z) Each gives

Reading the body of function 'AnswerType' in bind.c, called from 'do_c' and 'do_unlist', I notice that EXPRSXP and VECSXP are handled identically in the recurse = TRUE case. A corollary is that c(recursive = TRUE) and unlist(recursive = TRUE) treat expression vectors like expression(a, b) as lists of symbols and calls. And since they treat symbols and calls as

Hi, A common idiom in the R sources is to convert objects between LANGSXP and LISTSXP by using SET_TYPEOF. However, this is soon going to be disallowed in packages. From what I can see, there isn't currently a direct way to convert between these two object types using the available API. At the R level, one can convert calls to pairlists with: >