similar to: Modifying forestplot function in rmeta

Hi R users, I have a test dataframe ("file1," shown below) for which I am trying to create a flag for the first and last ID record (equivalent to SAS first.id and last.id variables. Dump of file1: > file1 id rx week dv1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 2 4 2 1 1 3 5 2 1 2 4 6 2 1 3 1 7 3 1 1 2 8 3 1 2 3 9 3 1 3

Hi All, I have been able to modify the x-axis to start at zero by adding xlow and xhigh parameters; that was pretty simple. I have been unable to find the location of the code that would turn off the information weighting of the box size (I have smaller randomized trials getting less weight than a much larger non-randomized trial). The function is forestplot() from rmeta. Thanks for any

Hi, It is known that the area of square plotted by forestplot is proportional to the studies' weights. But since there is not weight parameter in forestplot function, how does this function proportion the area of each square based on the related study's weight? Look forward to your reply, Carol [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I could not draw a forest plot for meta-analysis under ramdon models using the rmeta package. The rmeta has a default function for MH (fixed-effect) model. Has the rmeta package been updated for such a function? Or someone revised it and kept a private code? I would appreciate it if you could provide some information on this question. Thanks, Andrew This email is intended

Dear R users, I would like to adjust the x axis the way I wanted using "forestplot(labeltext, mean, lower, upper, align = NULL, xlab = "", zero = 0, graphwidth = unit(2, "inches"), col = meta.colors(), xlog = FALSE)". I tried using xaxt="n" and then redefine the axis using axis(1, at=c(0,0.5,1.0 ,1.5,2.0,2.5),label=c(0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5)), but it

Dear R users, I am trying to create a forest plot with a table of text using the forestplot() function in the rmeta package. I have been trying to reduce the font size of the resulting table of text, but have not been successful. I have tried adding options like 'cex' or 'font' but none of them seem to work. Is there anything I could do? This is what I have so far:

Hi, May be you can try this: obj_name<- load("arun.RData") Pred1<- get(obj_name[1]) Actual1<- get(obj_name[2]) library(reshape2) dat<-cbind(melt(Pred1,id.vars="S1"),value2=melt(Actual1,id.vars="S1")[,3])? # to reshape to long form colnames(dat)[3:4]<- c("Predict","Actual") dat$variable<- as.character(dat$variable) #not that

I know there is a function forestplot from rmeta package and also the plot.meta from the meta package and maybe others, but they are rather complicated with extra plot parameters that I do not need and also they process only objects created with other package functions. But I wonder if anyone has a much simpler function using the basic plot to make a forestplot with only a median (or mean) and

Hello, I have a data with following format:      Predictors          n11     n12     n21     n22     Odds.Ratio    log.ratio    se.log.odds. 1 ProcOR respirato     2 ProcVaric vein      3 DiagCardiac anom   4 DiagAllergy        5  DiagOth skin dx    6    DiagGastritis          I want to plot odds ratio by command: forestplot in rmeta library, but I get the following error constantly.  Error in

Hi, How is the combined value (displayed by a diamond on the forest plot) of a meta-analysis illustrated by a forest plot calculated? The applied method and all calculation details are welcome. Thanks Carol [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Greetings I have been trying to use metaplot to create a forest plot of my meta-analysis results. My data is in the form of ORs, so I've been inputting the ORs as the point estimate (mn) and the SEs of the logORs as the SE (se). However, whilst the point estimates appear to be displayed properly, many of the confidence intervals go below zero (not possible for an OR, as far as I know). I

Dear R users, I'm trying figuring out with forest plot and rmeta. Here's my code... library(rmeta) tabletext <- structure(c("", NA, "Sex", "[F]", "[M]", NA, "Age class", "(0,60]", "(60,80]", NA, "Karnofsky class", "[70;90]",

Dear R users, Is there any way to control the size of the box around the mean when creating a Forest plot using the forestplot function? regards Mark Mark T. Marino, MD VP, Early Clinical Development Mannkind Corp. 61 S. Paramus Road Paramus, NJ 07652 201-983-5238 Office 203-512-4008 Cell mmarino@mannkindcorp.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

> From: Abhijit Dasgupta <adasgupta@araastat.com> > Date: October 31, 2010 1:30:02 AM EDT > To: Matt Shotwell <shotwelm@musc.edu> > Subject: Re: [R] ForestPlot or similar > > I just did something very similar using ggplot's pointrange geom. In the following, I'm plotting hazard ratios, for which the nominal value is 1 and not 0. x has 5 columns: drug, hr,

Hello R users, I would like to create several forestplots with the same X axis, so, if you were to look at the plots lined up all the X axes would be identical (and the different plots could be compared). Here is one version of code I've used: mytk10<-c(0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10) pdf(file = "myfile.pdf", pointsize = 7, paper="letter", width=6, height=9)

Hi, I'm trying to build a Forest Plot using the second and fourth columns in the table (test.csv) below. My code is the following: curated <- data.frame("test.csv") tmp <- curated$coef tmp1 <- curated$se_coef plt <- metaplot(tmp, tmp1, xlim = c(-.45, .45)) I keep getting the following error at the last line and am not sure why: Error in if (is.na(lower[i] + upper[i]))

Der useRs, I'm working on meta analysis using rmeta package. Using code below I plot the forest plot: library(rmeta) data (catheter) a<-meta.MH (n.trt, n.ctrl, col.trt, col.ctrl, data=catheter, names=Name, subset=c(13,6,5,3,7,12,4,11,1,8,10,2)) summary(a) # odds ratio values and confidence intervals metaplot(a$logOR, a$selogOR, nn=a$selogOR^-2,a$names, summn=a$logMH, sumse=a$selogMH,

Hi, I have a problem with the metaplot-function in rmeta. After plotting a Forest Plot with "metaplot", no y-axis is shown for normal plots anymore. Does someone know, why this is and how I can solve it? Thank you in advance! Kind regards, Roman -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/metaplot-in-rmeta%3A-y-axis-disappears-tp24917401p24917401.html Sent from the R

Hello I'm trying to plot hazard risk values using the function metaplot with the specifications: > metaplot(HR,SE,W,labels=row.names(lc),xlab="Hazard Ratio",ylab="Covariates", logeffect=TRUE,logticks=FALSE,colors=meta.colors(box="black",lines="dark gray",zero="darkgray"),cex=1.5,cex.lab=1.5,font=3) However, in the plot the x axis

Full_Name: Naoki Takebayashi Version: 0.65.0+R-release.diff (Oct 6, 1999) OS: Linux/Alpha Submission from: (NULL) (129.79.224.171) This will fix the "problem 2 (crash in fft)" in Bug ID #277 On Linux/Alpha, make check failed because R could not handle the following example in base-Ex.R ##___ Examples ___: # The Old Faithful geyser data data(faithful) : : ## Missing values: x <-