similar to: How to show variables used in lm function call?

Hello R users, I have been trying to output all my results (text, plots, etc) into the same postscript file as one document, but have been unable to...Can anyone help me improve my code below so that I can accomplish this? Currently I have to output them separately then piece them back together into one document.. Thanks in Advance for any help! options (scipen=999, digits=7)

Hi, how to estimate a the following model in R: y(t)=beta0+beta1*x1(t)+beta2*x2(t)+...+beta5*x5(t)+beta6*y(t-1)+beta7*y(t-2)+beta8*y(t-3) 1) using "lm" : dates <- as.Date(data.df[,1]) selection<-which(dates>=as.Date("1986-1-1") & dates<=as.Date("2007-12-31")) dep <- ts(data.df[selection,c("dep")]) indep.ret1

Hello, Is there a better way to use paste such as: a = paste(colnames(list.indep)[1],colnames(list.indep)[2],colnames(list.indep)[3],colnames(list.indep)[4],colnames(list.indep)[5],sep="+") > a [1] "aa+dummy1+dummy2+bb+cc" I tried a = paste(colnames(list.indep)[1:5],sep="+") > a [1] "aa" "dummy1" "dummy2"

Hi useRs, I'm experiencing something quite weird with glm() and weights, and maybe someone can explain what I'm doing wrong. I have a dataset where each row represents a single case, and I run glm(...,family="binomial") and get my coefficients. However, some of my cases have the exact same values for predictor variables, so I should be able to aggregate up my data frame and

Hello R community, I have a question about the logistic regression function. Specifically, when the predictor variable has not just 0's and 1's, but also fractional values (between zero and one). I get a warning when I use the "glm(formula = ... , family = binomial(link = "logit"))" which says: "In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : non-integer #successes in a binomial

I am using R on a Windows XP professional platform. The following code is part of a bigger one CODE press=function(y,x){ library(qpcR) models.press=numeric(0) cat("\n") dep=y print(dep) indep=log(x) print(indep) yfit=dep-PRESS(lm(dep~indep))[[2]] cat("\n yfit\n") print(yfit) yfit.orig=yfit presid=y-yfit.orig press=sum(presid^2)

In a function, say foo.glm for glm objects I want to use the name of the object as a label for some output, but *only* if a glm object was passed as an argument, not a call to glm() producing that object. How can I distinguish these two cases? For example, I can use the following to get the name of the argument: foo.glm <- function(object) { oname <- as.character(sys.call())[2]

Could anyone tell me what am I doing wrong? > pro<-function(indep,dep){ + d<-data.frame(indep) + form<-formula(lm(dep~.,data=d)) + forward<-step(lm(dep~X1,data=d),scope=form,trace=0,direction='f') + return(forward) + } > pro(m,q) Error in inherits(x, "data.frame") : Object "d" not found Where q is a vector with the dependent variable's

I'm trying to develop some graphic methods for glm objects, but they only apply for models where all predictors are discrete factors. How can I test for this in a function, given the glm model object? That is, I want something that will serve as an equivalent of is.discrete.glm() in the following context: myplot.glm <- function(model, ...) { if (!inherits(model,"glm"))

Default arguments are evaluated in the function frame, not in the calling environment (nor in the same place as explicit arguments). > Which to me reads that a with statement as above is equivalent to > > > attach(data) ; aov.SS1(y=Obs) ; detach(data) > > Or is that just wishful thinking?? The latter. On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, RenE J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hello, > >

Hello world, I'm trying to do an anova on data in data.set, dependent variable is a column named "dep.var", grouping variable is in a column called "indep.var", and is.factor(indep.var) is TRUE... why can't I just do aov(dep.var ~ indep.var, data = data.set)? What have I done to deserve this?! What gives? Am I missing something totlly obvious? R-base-1.0.0-1,

Hi, I use lme to fit models like R> res1 <- lme(y~A+B, data=mydata, random=~1|subject) R> res2 <- lme(y~B+A, data=mydata, random=~1|subject) (only difference between these two models are the sequence in which the indep variables are written in formula) where y is continuous and A, B, and subject are factors. To get ANOVA table I used R> anova(res1) R> anova(res2) and found

Dear list, I have recently encountered an odd error when running glm(dep~indep, quasipoisson): while, with a subset of my data, I could get a perfectly reasonable model, once I include all of my data (17K+ observations, 29 variables), I get the following error: Error in if (any(y < 0)) stop("negative values not allowed for the quasiPoisson family") : missing value where

In http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/help/06/10/3064.html a method was given for converting a frequency table to an expanded data frame representing each observation as a set of factors. A slightly modified version was later included in the NCStats package, only on http://rforge.net/ (and it has too many dependencies to be useful). I've tried to make it more general, allowing an input

I commend you to (a) the recent article by Doug Bates on "Fitting nonlinear mixed models in R" pp. 27-30 in the latest issue of "R News" available from "www.r-project.org" -> Newsletter and (b) Doug's book with Pinheiro (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS (Springer). I suggest you try the same analysis using in "lmer", library(lme4), and

I am asking this question to see if it is possible or desirable to build a compilation/runtime system for C/C++ that can support the following: 1. allow bc to call native (in dynamically loaded *.so) 2. allow native to call bc (through JIT or interpreter) 3. can compile/interpret C/C++ sources _BASED_ on type info in precompiled bc Motivation: The class files produced by the java compiler

Dear All, I'me having (much) trouble understanding why it happened and answering a referee's comment to part of a submitted manuscript. I've tried to google for help but... I'm really confident that although this is a R-Help list someone can help me! I used R to do an ANCOVA w/ RNA/DNA as the dep var, sl as the indep var and gut (a factor w/ levels: prey and empty) as the

Hi all: I have a question on sample size calculation of 2 groups of data. If 2 groups of data are all normal distribution, then I can use the function "n.indep.t.test.eq" from samplesize package.But if 2 groups of data are all skewed distribution, but not normal distribution,how can I calculate the sample size then? I've tried many transformation (e.g. log arcsin…) in order to

Dear List, Some independent variable were missing in calculation using lm and glm (gaussian). (X= Y1+Y2+…..+Y16, Independent number: 16 variable) However, those variables did work well in cor(X, Y) respectively. str(dataframe) was also run to ensure that the variables were all numbers. Moreover, the missing variables were different in lm and glm. In lm, 3 factors were not taken into

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:34:07AM -0500, Zeyu Chen wrote: > I am asking this question to see if it is possible or desirable to > build a compilation/runtime system for C/C++ that can support the > following: > > 1. allow bc to call native (in dynamically loaded *.so) You can do this today, e.g., with lli -load=native.so file.bc > 2. allow native to call bc (through JIT or