Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "PRESS alternative"
2003 Oct 11
1
boot statictic fn for dual estimation of 2 stats?
Hi,
I am trying to use boot() to refit an ordinal logit (polr in MASS) model.
(A very basic bootstrap which samples from the data frame without
replacement and updates the model.)
I need to extract two statistics per run (the coefficients and zeta) and I
tried concatenating them into a single vector after fitting, but I get the
following error:
Error in "[<-"(*tmp*, r, ,
2006 Apr 24
1
rmeta: forest plot problem
Der useRs,
I'm working on meta analysis using rmeta package. Using code below I
plot the forest plot:
library(rmeta)
data (catheter)
a<-meta.MH (n.trt, n.ctrl, col.trt, col.ctrl, data=catheter, names=Name,
subset=c(13,6,5,3,7,12,4,11,1,8,10,2))
summary(a) # odds ratio values and confidence intervals
metaplot(a$logOR, a$selogOR, nn=a$selogOR^-2,a$names, summn=a$logMH,
sumse=a$selogMH,
2013 May 07
0
extracting the residuals from models working with ordinal multinomial data
Hello
I am having some problems for extracting the residuals from models
working with ordinal multinomial data.
Either working with the polr() function or the plsRglm () function,
the residuals are "NULL". I guess this is because the data is
multinomial but I do not know how to solve it.
I have read the following in internet:
"can you tell us how residuals would be defined in
2009 Jun 19
2
a plot of stacked boxes
Hello,
I would like to create a plot composed of stacked boxes (squares or
rectangles), where the size of the box would represent the frequency of
observations based on a categorical variable (group), the color would
represent the proportion of success (binary) within that group (outcome) on
a predetermined color scale. Ideally the boxes can be stacked from the
bottom left to the top right based
2008 Dec 17
2
PREDICT NEW VALUES FROM REGRESSION MODEL, EST. ST.ERROR, AND CI
Greetings,
I'd be grateful if a good Samaritan helps me to approach this problem....
with my data, I've created the following model
lm(formula = OUTCOME ~ VAR1 + VAR2)
summary(model)
Call:
lm(formula = OUTCOME ~ VAR1 + VAR2)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-1.4341 -0.3621 0.1879 0.4994 0.7696
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 1.89020
2006 May 26
3
Vector elements and ratios
Dear useRs,
I have two different length vectors: one column (1...m) and one row
vector (1...n):
20
40
20
60
5 4 2
Now I have to calculate ratios between column vector elements and each
row vector elements:
4 5 10
8 10 20
4 5 20
15 12 30
Thank's in advance for any suggestions,
Andrej
2011 Nov 14
2
Checkinstall and R-2.14.0
Dear all,
I try to install the latest R version using checkinstall (v. 1.6.2) on
Ubuntu 11.10. After solving all the dependencies (installed using
apt-get build-dep r-base) checkinstall fails to build and install R
package with the following error (the same commands build and install
R-2.13.2 on the same machine without any problem):
wget
2006 Jan 17
6
For each element in vector do...
Dear R useRs,
I have a vector with positive and negative numbers:
A=c(0,1,2,3,0,4,5)
Now if i-th element in vector A is > 0, then i-th element in vector B
is a+1
else i-th element in vector b=a (or 0)
vector A: 0 1 2 3 0 4 5
vector B: 0 2 3 4 0 5 6
What's the right way to do this. I still have some problems with for and
if statements...
Cheers, Andrej
2008 Dec 12
1
Concordance Index - interpretation
Hello everyone.
This is a question regarding generation of the concordance index (c
index) in R using the function rcorr.cens. In particular about
interpretation of its direction and form of the 'predictor'.
One of the arguments is a "numeric predictor variable" ( presumably
this is just a *single* predictor variable). Say this variable takes
numeric values.... Am I
2009 Jan 30
1
simulating outcomes - categorical distribution (?)
Hi,
I am simulating an event that has 15 possible outcomes and I have a
vector 'pout' that gives me the probability of each outcome -
different outcomes have different probabilities. Does anyone know a
simple way of simulating the outcome of my event?
If my event had only two possible outcomes (0/1) I would pick a
uniform random number between 0 and 1 and use it to choose between the
two
2006 Jan 25
3
read.table problem
Dear R useRs,
I have big (23000 rows), vertical bar delimited file:
e.g.
A00001|Text a,Text b, Text c|345
A00002|Text bla|456
...
..
.
Try using
A <- read.table('filename.txt', header=FALSE,sep='\|')
process stop at line 11975 with warning message:
number of items read is not a multiple of the number of columns
I have no problems with processing similar file, which is
2003 May 11
1
NLME - multilevel model using binary outcome - logistic regression
Hi!
I'm pretty raw when working with the R models (linear or not).
I'm wondering has anybody worked with the NLME library and dichotomous
outcomes.
I have a binary outcome variable that I woul like to model in a nested
(multilevel) model.
I started to fit a logistic model to a NLS function, but could not suceed. I
know there are better ways to do it in R with either the LRM or GLM wih
2003 Sep 30
2
FW: error predicting values from the LME
HI all,
I might add some more information in order to possibly solve my problem. I'm
really stuck and no obvious solutions do the trick.
I'm using R 1.7.1 on Windows 2000 with the packages regurarly updated.
I'm using hypothetical data constructed as a pseudo population conforming to
a certain Var-Cov structure.
I might add that just
> predict(level2)
works. But when I add the
2010 Sep 30
2
nested unbalanced regression analysis
Hello, I am having a problem figuring out how to model a continuous outcome
(y) given a continuous predictor (x1) and two levels of nested categorical
predictors (x3 nested in x2). The data are observational, not from a
designed experiment. There are about 15 levels of x2 and between 3 and 14
levels of x3 nested within each level of x2. There are between 6 and 50 x1,y
observations for each unique
2012 Feb 07
1
survfit is too slow! Looking for an alternative
Hi All
I found survfit function was very slow for a large
dataset and I am looking for an alternative way to quickly get the predicted
survival probabilities.
My
historical data set is a pool of loans with monthly observed default status for
24 months. I would like to fit the proportional hazard model with time varying
covariate such as unemployment rates and time constant variables at loan
2003 Sep 03
1
glmmPQL probelm
Dear listers,
First let me appologize if the same mail arrives multiple times. Recently I
had some probelms sending my e-mails to the list.
I encountered a problem when running glmmPQL procuedure doing multilevel
modeling with a dichotomous outcome.
Those are the two error messages I usually get:
Error in logLik.reStruct(object, conLin) :
NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 3)
2009 Feb 15
0
PRESS / RMSEP
Dear all ,
I want to do PRESS (prediction error sums of squares)
or the residual mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) which will give me
value that is valid for 'future predictions of independent data'. I am
using different methods for example, Multiple Linear Regression, LASSO
regression, Ridge Regression, Elastic Net regression etc.
I am wandering if there are
2012 Sep 19
0
Discrepancies in weighted nonlinear least squares
Dear all,
I encounter some discrepancies when comparing the deviance of a weighted and
unweigthed model with the AIC values.
A general example (from 'nls'):
DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1)
fm1DNase1 <- nls(density ~ SSlogis(log(conc), Asym, xmid, scal), DNase1)
This is the unweighted fit, in the code of 'nls' one can see that 'nls'
generates a vector
2004 Apr 08
1
R/Splus code for PRESS?
Dear R-help,
Does anybody know where can I find R/Splus code for computing
PREdiction Sum of Squares (PRESS)
in a linear regression model?
I have a large regression model (~100 predictors, ~30,000 cases)
and good prediction is the main goal.
I remember there is a faster way to compute it (no need to
repeatedly fit models), but if there is existing code......
Thanks.
Mai Z
2011 Jun 15
1
When models and anova(model) disagree...
I have a situation where the parameter estimates from lrm identify a
binary predictor variable ("X") as clearly non-significant (p>0.3), but
the ANOVA of that same model gives X a chi^2-df rank of > 200, and
adjudicates X and one interaction of X and a continuous measure as
highly significant. The N is massive and X has two categories, each
with > 100,000 observations.