similar to: Maintain Spaces and Parentheses in Variable Names

Hello everyone, Hope it is the good place for this (I discuss the question of the right place below). Most of the time, warnings are more than 1000 characters long and thus are truncated. Most of the time, this generates printouts with unbalanced parentheses. Intelligent text editors which do parentheses highlighting get very confused with this. After too many warnings, they give errors, and

Commit-ID: c970d7573aa382c89d3c71b88cd10f4c6a464264 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=c970d7573aa382c89d3c71b88cd10f4c6a464264 Author: Antonio Ospite <ao2 at ao2.it> AuthorDate: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:42:20 +0200 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] [PATCH] eval: Silence compiler

Commit-ID: e3da328217a1fbfaad2ae617dbc26746adf63f8f Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=e3da328217a1fbfaad2ae617dbc26746adf63f8f Author: Antonio Ospite <ao2 at ao2.it> AuthorDate: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:42:20 +0200 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:55 +0000 [klibc] dash: eval: Silence compiler

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=574 Summary: nf_conntrack_ftp.c ignores RFC 1123 regarding parentheses in FTP passive mode message 227 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>> "humbertc" == humbertc <humbertc@univ-mlv.fr> > >>>>> on Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:16:58 +0200 (CEST) writes: > > humbertc> Full_Name: Cyril Humbert > humbertc> Version: 1.9.1 > humbertc> OS: Debian GNU/Linux (i386) > humbertc> Submission from: (NULL) (193.50.159.2) >

Dear useRs I am looking for a way to randomise the values within a matrix: the conditions are that the sums of the rows and the sums of the columns should remain the same as in the original matrix. Any help would be appreciated Cheers Yann

Dear list, I am importing data consisting of numbers into dataframes. Some of the numbers are flanked by parentheses or square brackets. Thus, they are not recognized as numeric and the corresponding column is of class "factor" which makes it hard/impossible use in plotting functions. Is there a way to remove brackets from numbers in a column/row/dataframe? Kind regards, Stefan --

For what it's worth: running R CMD check on a package when the outdir has parentheses in the pathname fails with the following error: * checking PDF version of manual ...sh: Syntax error: "(" unexpected WARNING LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. * checking PDF version of manual without hyperrefs or index ...sh: Syntax error: "("

>>>>> "humbertc" == humbertc <humbertc@univ-mlv.fr> >>>>> on Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:16:58 +0200 (CEST) writes: humbertc> Full_Name: Cyril Humbert humbertc> Version: 1.9.1 humbertc> OS: Debian GNU/Linux (i386) humbertc> Submission from: (NULL) (193.50.159.2) humbertc> Hello, humbertc> For the X11 graphic

Simple Case: 1.int main() 2.{ 3. int i = 0; 4. return 0; 5.} compile command: clang -g a.c In LLVM IR, we have one attribute named "scopeLine" to indicate the left parentheses. But we don't have one attribute to indicate the right parentheses (line 5 in this example). So if we use gdb to debug it: (gdb) b main Breakpoint 1 at 0x100005c8: file a.c, line 3. (gdb) r Breakpoint

I''m not sure whether this is a bug or whether I''m simply expecting Ferret queries to work in a way other than they''re intended. I notice that if use a query like: (other_text:"Collaborative tools") AND NOT other_text:podcasts I''ll get correct search results. However, if I put parentheses around the second part, like:

I have implemented this exact behavior in an out of tree LLVM fork I maintain, where one of my users needed this behavior, and it seems to work well. What we have done is extend the definition of DISubprogram to contain a new field "endLine" which holds the line number of the closing brace. A pass late in our backend uses this information to set the DebugLoc of return instructions in our

To create a more end-user readable table captions for modeld, I would like to get rid of the I(...) construct in formulae ("what's the hell does the I(..) mean in the contrast table") Example: effect ~ I(sqrt(nitro))*treat + I(nitro^2) should giv effect ~ sqrt(nitro)*treat + nitro^2 In know, this is a dumb model, just my test case. As far I remember, finding matching parentheses

Perhaps someone will have a solution to my more general problem, but here is the specific one: I used the round() function to round some estimates to 3 decimal places. I then sent put the rounded estimates in a matrix and used latex() to make a LaTeX table from them. However, in my table, there are estimtes which only have 2 decimal places. I assume that the third decimal place in these numbers

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ]

Dear R-users, I would like to construct a list of arguments for a function in a format function (list(item1=c("A","B"), item2=c("B","C")), item3=...): The individual vectors in the list are permutations of colnames of a dataframe. The trouble is that I am not able to handle escaping of parentheses correctly. I was trying the following: library(gregmisc)