similar to: recursive List extraction question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "recursive List extraction question"

2010 Dec 09
1
Dynamically build functional expression and taking derivative
Hi! I'm faced the next problem: suppose I have a vector of some coefficient and for some purpose from these coefficients I need dynamically build a functional expression (because, the number of elements in the vector of coefficients might differ each time). So, I'm trying to do like this (let the number of coefficients be 3): Building expression > foo <-
2010 Aug 18
2
[LLVMdev] Git repository to use (read-only)?
On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 11:49:28 am Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello > > > Is there some official git repository to clone from? > > Not yet, but probably there will be something pretty soon. > Right now there are some unofficial mirrors at repo.or.cz and github Ok, then I will try to wait until the official is ready. If I now start that with an unofficial one, I will
2017 Jun 05
2
Question about llvm::Value::print performance
Dear Thomas, > Hi Christoph, > > maybe there is a way of caching the print outputs and output them at the > end of the program execution? > So, your real application do not have this kind of bottle neck. this is a valid idea, thought the problem is: I output all things only "once" and I even output it like: 1) load module 2) go over functions 3) output all blocks with
2017 Jun 05
2
Question about llvm::Value::print performance
Hi, I want to use llvm::Value::print to output the assembly strings for llvm::Instructions inside a rather large llvm::Module (linked module with lots of types/...). I started with plain ::print and switched over to http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1Value.html#a04e6fc765eeb0c4c90ac5d55113db116 with a ModuleSlotTracker I pass in myself to avoid some complexity. Still now I have
2010 Aug 18
2
[LLVMdev] Git repository to use (read-only)?
Hi, we want to use LLVM together with clang internally for preprocessing and Co. Therefor we would like to integrate it in our buildsystem. The nicest thing for us would be a local git repository mirror, to allow us to easily create own branches and Co. Is there some official git repository to clone from? I looked up the archives and seen that creating own clones of the SVN via git svn is not
2013 Aug 15
1
[LLVMdev] Question about non-UTF-8 filesystems
Hi, it seems that e.g. on Windows, where the filename encoding is not UTF-8, it is impossible to use any filenames containing e.g. german umlauts or chinese characters, because the in LLVM used encoding collides with the encoding used by the OS. There is a open bug for this http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10348 It seems there were patches submitted to fix it, but they were never applied as
2017 Jul 04
4
trunc nsw/nuw?
Hi, > Hi Alexandre, > > LLVM currently doesn't have trunc nsw/nuw, no. > Which frontend would emit such instructions? Any application in mind? > Just asking because if no frontend could emit those, then the motivation to > add nsw/nuw support to trunc would be very low I guess. I think the clang frontend could use that to allow better static analysis of integer overflows on
2009 Feb 05
1
Multiple-Line Comment (PR#13503)
Hello, sorry for writing here because my problem is not a realt bug but may be a solution for many people working with R: I miss the feature for commenting some lines of code at once without writing a bunch of "#" in front of each line. This is interesting for trying out some code. I found some workarounds like IFELSE(FALSE){} and `!`<- function(x) { if (inherits(x,
2019 May 06
4
Proposal to add preprocessor warning for unused command line macros
This is a proposal for either adding a new, or updating an existing command line option such that a diagnostic can optionally be produced for unused -D macros. Long-lived large projects with thousands of files and many contributors have a tendency to accumulate build options over time. As time passes some build options like macros become replaced, obsolete, or simply no longer used. At the same
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 16/24] i386 Vmi io header
Move I/O instruction building to the sub-arch layer. Some very crafty but esoteric macros are used here to get optimized native instructions for port I/O in Linux be writing raw instruction strings. Adding a wrapper layer here is fairly easy, and makes the full range of I/O instructions available to the VMI interface. Also, slowing down I/O is not a useful operation in a VM, so there is a VMI
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 16/24] i386 Vmi io header
Move I/O instruction building to the sub-arch layer. Some very crafty but esoteric macros are used here to get optimized native instructions for port I/O in Linux be writing raw instruction strings. Adding a wrapper layer here is fairly easy, and makes the full range of I/O instructions available to the VMI interface. Also, slowing down I/O is not a useful operation in a VM, so there is a VMI
2003 Aug 05
0
Net rpc vampire + LDAP broken?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I tried to migrate a NT4 domain to Samba. There was no problem joining the domain and the SID was imported. But when I execute "net rpc vampire - -S MYNT4PDC -U Administrator%passwd" I get the following result: Fetching DOMAIN database SAM_DELTA_DOMAIN_INFO not handled Creating unix group: 'DomCreating unix group:
2004 Oct 28
1
polr versus multinom
Hi, I am searching for methods to compare regression models with an ordered categorical response variable (polr versus multinom). The pattern of predictions of both methods (using the same predictor variables) is quite different and the AIC is smaller for the multinom approach. I guess polr has more strict premises for the structure of the response variable, which methods can be used to test for
2017 Aug 25
9
[5.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged
Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc3 was just tagged. This is a release candidate in the real sense: if nothing bad comes up in testing, this is what the release is going to look like. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp (use the /data/testers-uploads/ directory) and let me know what issues remain. I know we're a little bit behind schedule, but hopefully we can get to 'final'
2017 Sep 14
0
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On 14 September 2017 at 11:54, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > > I have some
2017 Sep 14
7
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. >> > >> > That's very odd, since
2017 Sep 14
1
JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2017 at 11:54, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich at richhuff.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247
2010 Sep 24
0
[LLVMdev] Git repository to use (read-only)?
It's not *very* easy to do, but if you were to pull in the new branch, and then rebase the old branches onto the proper revisions of the new one, you *could* keep your branches. Also, any idea what is *very* soon? Are we talking this month, or maybe this year? Indy On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Christoph Cullmann <cullmann at absint.de> wrote: > On Wednesday, August 18, 2010
2020 Feb 04
2
RFC: Add a preprocessor to yaml2obj (and other YAML tools)
?The idea itself is indeed good. Regarding to escaping: I think we should have it. Imagine the following example (I've took it from D73828). --- !ELF FileHeader: Class: ELFCLASS[[BITS]] Data: ELFDATA2LSB Type: ET_EXEC Machine: EM_386 # RUN: yaml2obj %s --docnum=4 -D BITS=32 -o %t-32bit.o # RUN: yaml2obj %s --docnum=4 -D BITS=64 -o %t-64bit.o Without escaping it would
2017 Jul 05
2
trunc nsw/nuw?
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 07/04/2017 01:41 AM, Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann via llvm-dev wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Hi Alexandre, >>> >>> LLVM currently doesn't have trunc nsw/nuw, no. >>> Which frontend would emit such instructions? Any application in mind?