similar to: convert dataframe to matrix for cmdscale

Hi We have a few questions regarding the use of the "isoMDS" function. When we run "isoMDS" function using 60,000 x 60,000 data matrix, we get the following error message: ------------------------------------ cmdscale(d, k) : invalid value of 'n' Calls: isoMDS -> cmdscale ------------------------------------ We checked the source code of "cmdscale" and

Hello, I have a dilemma that I'm hoping the R gurus will be able to help resolve. For background: My data is in the form of a (dis)similarity matrix created from taking the inverse of normalized reaction times. That is, each cell of the matrix represents how long it took to distinguish two stimuli from one another-- a square matrix of 45X45 where the diagonal values are all zero (since this

Hi, I'm trying to use isoMDS to project a directed graph to 2-dim vectors, but I got an error. #here is the code to create the graph using igraph package and run isoMDS on it. library(igraph) library(MASS) g<-make_graph(c(1,2, 2,3, 2,4, 3,4, 4,5, 5,6, 3,6, 1,6, 2,5),directed=TRUE) dist<-distances(g, mode="out") loc<-isoMDS(dist) # below is content of the dist matrix

Dear R developers, there appears to be a small problem with function cmdscale: for non-Euclidean distance matrices, using option add=FALSE (the default), cmdscale misses the smallest eigenvalue. This affects GOF statistic g.1 (See Mardia, Kent + Bibby (1979): Multivariate Analysis, eq. (14.4.7). The corresponding formula in Cox + Cox (2001): Multidimensional Scaling, 2nd ed., p 38, would

Dear All, I am in the somewhat unfortunate position of having to reproduce the results previously obtained from (non-metric?) MDS on a "kinship" matrix using Statistica. A kinship matrix measures affinity between groups, and has its maximum values on the diagonal. Apparently, starting with a nxn kinship matrix, all it was needed to do was to feed it to Statistica flagging that the

Full_Name: Cam Webb Version: 1.6.0 (fink X11 compile) OS: Mac OS X (Jaguar) Submission from: (NULL) (64.168.28.87) This is an unpredictable, intermittant hang during cmdscale of the mva library. Some data never cause a problem, other data always do, abut I can't track down the difference in the structure of the data. Sometimes the function will work for `difficult' data after it has

Dear R-list members, I need an help with the Multidimensional Scaling analysis (MDS). So far I used the cmdscale() command in R, but I did not get the perceptual map I would love to see, and I would like to know if it is possible to get it using R, and if yes how. I also had a look to the functions isoMDS() and sammoc() but with no luck. I summarize the experiment I performed, and I would ask you

In applying multidimensional scaling, it seems to me that sometimes the underlying dimensionality of the matrix is 1. However I found a case where cmdscale failed when I tried k=1. Here it is: m<-matrix( c(.5,.81,.23,.47,.61, .19,.5,.06,.17,.28, .77,.94,.5,.74,.85, .53,.83,.26,.5,.64, .39,.72,.15,.36,.5), nrow=5) # BTW I think cmdscale uses only the lower triangle--how to enter only # that

Hi, I am looking for the best multidimensional configuration for my data (47*47 distance matrix). I ve tried classical metric (cmdscale) and non metric MDS (isoMDS, nmds) but it is now difficult to choose the best solution because of the uncertainties in the definitions of the "stress" function. So, same problem, several questions : 1. Statistical consideration : With

Hi all, I'm trying to perform an MDS of some data that I have. When I use cmdscale everything is fine and I get some interesting results however, the tends to be low. What I wnat to do is compare this with the Non-Metric MDS using isoMDS or sammon. However, when I try using these I get the following message. Error in isoMDS(x.dist) : zero or negative distance between objects 2 and 4

If tbl is an object of class 'dist', you can do this: a <- sammon(tbl, k=3) But you can't do this: b <- isoMDS(tbl, k=3) Wouldn't it be sensible to have identical interfaces to sammon() and isoMDS() ? I think all that would be needed is to change this: isoMDS <- function(d, y=cmdscale(d, 2), maxit=50, trace=TRUE) { ...into this: isoMDS <-

Hi. I know matrices that use distances between places works fine when using cmdscale. However, what about matricies such as: A B C D E A 0 1 23 12 9 B 1 0 10 12 3 C 23 10 0 23 4 D 12 12 23 0 21 E 9 3 4 21 0 i.e. matrices which do not represent physical distances between places (as they would not make sense for real distances such as the one above)

I'm using rseptbeta for w95, I tried to do: > library(mva) > data(eurodist) > cmdscale(eurodist) Error in .C("dblcen", x, as.integer(n)) : C/Fortran function not in load table > how can I solve this problem? Andrea Rossetti _______________________________________________________ Statistica & Informatica per la Gestione delle Imprese | Universit? degli Studi di

Dear List: I have a question regarding an MDS procedure that I am accustomed to using. I have searched around the archives a bit and the help doc and still need a little assistance. The package isoMDS is what I need to perform the non-metric scaling, but I am working with similarity matrices, not dissimilarities. The question may end up being resolved simply. Here is a bit of substantive

Hello all- I'm having some problems with memory consumption under R. I've tried increasing the appropriate memory values, but it keeps asking for more; I've even upped the heap size to 600M, significantly eating into swap (256M real, 500+M swap). So, performance slows to a crawl. What I'm trying to do is run isoMDS on a 4000x4000 matrix. My first question is, how much memory

The function cmdscale tries to copy names from the source to the result. This only works if the source is a matrix. If m is a matrix with labels (rownames) and d is an object of class "dist" with labels, this works: cmdscale(m) ...but with this, there are no labels in the results: cmdscale(d) However, this works: cmdscale(as.matrix(d)) My suggestion is to change, in

Hi, I'm trying to do a non-metric multidimensional scaling using isoMDS. However, I have some '0' distances in my data, and I'm not sure how to deal with them. I'd rather not drop rows from the original data, as I am comparing several datasets (morphology and molecular data) for the same individuals, and it's interesting to see how much morphological variation can be

I'm looking for someone to explain the difference between these procedures. The function prcomp() does principal components anaylsis, and the function cmdscale() does classical multi-dimensional scaling (also called principal coordinates analysis). My confusion stems from the fact that they give very similar results: my.d <- matrix(rnorm(50), ncol=5) rownames(my.d) <-

Dear useRs, last week I asked you about a problem related to isoMDS. It turned out that in my case isoMDS was trapped. Nonetheless, I still have some problems with other data sets. Therefore I would like to know if anyone here has experience with how well isoMDS performs in comparison to other non-metric MDS routines, like Minissa. I have the feeling that for large data sets with a high

Hi, I just encountered what I thought was strange behavior in MDS. However, it turned out that the mistake was mine. The lesson learned from my mistake is that one should plot on a square pane when plotting results of an MDS. Not doing so can be very misleading. Follow the example of an equilateral triangle below to see what I mean. I hope this helps others to avoid this kind of headache.