similar to: lsoda warning "too much accuracy requested"

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "lsoda warning "too much accuracy requested""

2017 Jun 21
4
How to apply a system of ordinary differential equations to a cell grid?
Hello, I am developing an agent-based model to simulate the spread of infectious diseases in heterogeneous landscapes composed of habitat polygons (or clumps of connected cells). To simplify the model, I consider a habitat grid (or raster) containing the polygon ID of each cell. In addition, I have epidemiological parameters associated with each polygon ID. At each time step, the parameter values
2005 Nov 06
1
Problem defining a system of odes as a C library with lsoda
I have been trying to make use of the odesolve library on my university's Linux grid - currently R version 2.0.1 is installed and the system runs 64-bit Scientific Linux based on Redhat. I cannot seem to get lsoda working when I define the model as a shared C library. For example, the following snippet uses the mymod.c example bundled with the package: ### START rm(list=ls())
2005 Jul 27
4
odesolve/lsoda differences on Windows and Mac
Hi - I am getting different results when I run the numerical integrator function lsoda (odesolve package) on a Mac and a PC. I am trying to simulating a system of 10 ODE's with two exogenous pulsed inputs to the system, and have had reasonably good success with many model parameter sets. Under some parameter sets, however, the simulations fail on the Mac (see error message below). The
2008 Apr 09
3
LSODA not accurate when RK4 is; what's going on?
I'm solving the differential equation dy/dx = xy-1 with y(0) = sqrt(pi/2). This can be used in computing the tail of the normal distribution. (The actual solution is y(x) = exp(x^2/2) * Integral_x_inf {exp(-t^2/2) dt} = Integral_0_inf {exp (-xt - t^2/2) dt}. For large x, y ~ 1/x, starting around x~2.) I'm testing both lsoda and rk4 from the package odesolve. rk4 is accurate using step
2004 Jan 22
4
Fitting compartmental model with nls and lsoda?
Dear Colleagues, Our group is also working on implementing the use of R for pharmacokinetic compartmental analysis. Perhaps I have missed something, but > fit <- nls(noisy ~ lsoda(xstart, time, one.compartment.model, c(K1=0.5, k2=0.5)), + data=C1.lsoda, + start=list(K1=0.3, k2=0.7), + trace=T + ) Error in eval(as.name(varName), data) : Object
2003 Nov 05
3
using LSODA in R
R help list subscribers, I am a new user of R. I am attempting to use R to explore a set of equations specifying the dynamics of a three trophic level food chain. I have put together this code for the function that is to be evaluted by LSODA. My equations Rprime, Cprime, and Pprime are meant to describe the actual equation of the derivative. When I run LSODA, I do not get the output that
2004 Sep 06
1
A naive lsoda question....
Hello, I am an R newbie, trying to use lsoda to solve standard Lotka-Volterra competition equations. My question is: how do I pass a parameter that varies with time, like say, phix <- 0.7 + runif(tmax) in the example below. # defining function lotvol <- function(t,n,p){ x <- n[1]; y <- n[2] rx <- p["rx"]; ry <- p["ry"] Kx <-
2004 Jun 10
2
odesolve: lsoda vs rk4
I'm trying to use odesolve for integrating various series of coupled 1st order differential equations (derived from a system of enzymatic catalysis and copied below, apologies for the excessively long set of parameters). The thing that confuses me is that, whilst I can run the function rk4: out <- rk4(y=y,times=times,func=func, parms=parms) and the results look not unreasonable:
2001 May 11
1
lsoda
I am running R 1.2.3 with ESS5.1.18 with Windows 98. I am trying to use lsoda in the odesolve apckage and am having problems. Question: The return value of the function of the system of ode's has to be a list that includes first, the ode's and second, "a vector (possibly with a `names' attribute) of global values that are required at each point in `times'." I
2005 Oct 25
2
solving ODE's in matrix form with lsoda()
Hello there, Suppose you want to solve the following system of ODE's (a simple Lotka-Volterra predator prey model) dP/dt = beta*P*V - mu*P dV/dt = r*V - beta*P*V where P and V are the numbers of predators and prey. Now, this is easy to do, but suppose you have a system of equations like this, dP1/dt = beta1*P1*V1 - mu1*P1 dP2/dt = beta2*P2*V2 - mu2*P2 dV1/dt = r1*V1 - beta1*P1*V1
2005 Oct 26
2
changing memory limits to speed up lsoda
Hi All, I am running R 2.2.0 on Mac OS 10.4.2, dual G5 processors with 8 Gig RAM. I am running a simulation with lsoda that requires ~378 s to complete one set of time intervals. I need to optimize the parameters, and so need to considerably speed up the simulation. I have tried to figure out how to change the appropriate memory allocation and have search R help and Introductory
2009 May 26
2
using lsoda() and nls() together
Thanks to Dieter Menne and Spencer Graves I started to get my way through lsoda() Now I need to use it in with nls() to assess parameters I have a go with a basic example dy/dt = K1*conc I try to assess the value of K1 from a simulated data set with a K1 close to 2. Here is (I think) the best code that I've done so far even though it crashes when I call nls()
2004 Jun 10
0
lsoda with arbitrary zero thresholds (with psuedo-solution)
Dear Hank, Last question first: really, only you can say for sure if 4e-281 and 5e-11 are small enough; it depends on the units you measure your state variables in. However, this strategy cannot get the state variables to exactly 0. Obviously, you could get closer to 0.0 faster by setting the derivatives even larger in absolute value. You may run into problems with the solver when the
2010 Apr 06
1
estimating the starting value within a ODE using nls and lsoda
All- I am interested in estimating a parameter that is the starting value for an ODE model. That is, in the typical combined fitting procedure using nls and lsoda (alternatively rk4), I first defined the ODE model: minmod <- function(t, y, parms) { G <- y[1] X <- y[2] with(as.list(parms),{ I_t <- approx(time, I.input, t)$y dG <- -1*(p1 + X)*G +p1*G_b dX <-
2009 Dec 06
2
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object 'N' not found
I'm running an LSODA to generate some graphs, but I need to stop at a certain point and use those values to generate another LSODA output. This is working fine, but when I try to run the second LSODA, I get the "Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object 'N' not found". Any ideas what can be causing this? I have no object 'N' anywhere in the script. I made an
2004 Oct 06
1
Foreign code problem
Hello, I wanted to test the odesolve package and tried to use compiled C-code. But when I do: erg <- lsoda(y, times, "mond", parms, rtol, atol, tcrit=NULL, jacfunc=NULL, verbose=FALSE, dllname="mond", hmin=0, hmax=Inf) I get the error message: Error in lsoda(y, times, "mond", parms, rtol, atol, tcrit = NULL, jacfunc =
2005 Nov 14
1
(no subject)
Hi, I am trying to solve a model that consists of rather stiff ODEs in R. I use the package ODEsolve (lsoda) to solve these ODEs. To speed up the integration, the jacobian is also specified. Basically, the model is a one-dimensional advection-diffusion problem, and thus the jacobian is a tridiagonal matrix. The size of this jacobian is 100*100. In the original package
2006 Apr 25
1
Windows MinGW compiler clarification, consequences
The information at http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#The-MinGW-compilers and http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ is slightly inconsistent about the compiler used to build Windows binary packages available through cran. The 'candidate' package of the recommended MinGW-5.0.0.exe installs g++/g77 3.4.4 (as does the updated installer MinGW-5.0.2.exe). "An
2004 Sep 20
1
problem typcasting return of R_ExternalPtrAddr(SEXP s)
In the odesolve routine lsoda(), I allow the function (named func) that calculates the system of differential equations to be defined in a dll that has been dynamically loaded from the file named in dllname. I use getNativeSymbolInfo(func, dllname)$address to get the address of the function and pass it to a C function called via the .Call interface. Inside that C function, I use
2006 Nov 21
1
f2c to achieve reentrancy in odesolve?
I am beginning a much-delayed update of odesolve to include several ordinary differential equation solvers from the Livermore package ODEPACK. These are much-used and reliable Fortran codes, and I plan (as I did for lsoda in the current odesolve package) to make as few changes as possible to the Fortran 77 code. However, recently someone wanted to make nested calls to lsoda, which will not work,