similar to: Bucketing/Grouping Probabilities

OK, Let's try this again! Here is the reproducible script; it is long because I had to copy the panel dataset here. My question is related to systemfit; I don't know how to get the result for the entire panel. #Reproducible script Empdata<- read.csv("/Users/ngwinuiazenui/Documents/UPLOADemp.csv") View(Empdata) install.packages("systemfit")

Sadly you failed to set your email program to send plain text and the data is corrupted at my end. I also think you need to reduce the size of the data set... the intent here is to increase your understanding, not debug your particular analysis. I will say that I am having a very challenging time understanding what you are trying to accomplish though. What are the equations that you think need

Hi r-users,   I would like to extract the data that match.  Attached is my data: I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no' > cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)             z  intg rand_no    [1,]  0.00 0.000   0.001    [2,]  0.01 0.000   0.002    [3,]  0.02 0.000   0.002    [4,]  0.03 0.000   0.003    [5,]  0.04 0.000   0.003    [6,] 

... and the mailing list is picky about attachments... whatever you attached did not conform to the stringent requirements mentioned in the Posting Guide. Pasting the code right into the email is usually safest, though you DO have to post using plain text (as the Posting Guide indicates) or your code may get mangled by the automatic html format removal. On May 15, 2018 7:04:31 AM PDT, Bert Gunter

Unless there is good reason not to, always cc the list -- there are lots of smarter folks than I on it who can help. I may or may not have time to look at this. Hopefully someone else will. -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip

I have a table like the following. I want to fit Cm to Vm like this: Cm ~ Cl+Q1*b1*38.67*exp(-b1*(Vm-Vp1)*0.03867)/(1+exp(-b1*(Vm-Vp1)*0.03867))^2+Q2*b2*38.67*exp(-b2*(Vm-Vp2)*0.03867)/(1+exp(-b2*(Vm-Vp2)*0.03867))^2 I use nls, with start=list(Q1=2e-3, b1=1, Vp1=-25, Q2=3e-3, b2=1, Vp2=200). But I always get 'singlular gradient' error like this. But in SigmaPlot I can get the result. How

Hello, I’m trying to follow the syntax of a script from a journal website. In order to create a regression formula used later in the script, the regression matrix must have column names “X1”, “X2”, etc. I have tried to assign these column names to my matrix ScoutRSM.mat using a for loop, but I don’t know how to interpret the error message. Suggestions? Thanks, Paul

I can't get my simultaneous equations to work using system fit. Please help. #Reproducible script Empdata<- read.csv("/Users/ngwinuiazenui/Documents/UPLOADemp.csv") View(Empdata) str(Empdata) Empdata$gnipc<-as.numeric(Empdata$gnipc) install.packages("systemfit") library("systemfit") pdata <- plm.data(Empdata,

Hi there, I am doing multiple comparisons for data that is not normally distributed. For this purpose I tried both functions kruskal{agricolae} and kruskalmc{pgirmess}. It confuses me that these functions do not yield the same results although they are doing the same thing, don't they? Can anyone tell my why this happens and which function I can trust? kruskalmc() tells me that there are no

Dear list, I am currently working with a rather large data set on body temperature regulation in wintering birds. My original model contains quite a few dependent variables, but I do not (of course) wish to keep them all in my final model. I've fitted the following model to the data: >

Hi, I am getting a warning message when I am fitting a generalized mixed model (mod_2) and I don't understand why because when I add just an interaction factor the model works perfectly (mod_1). Does anyone know what it happpens ? Thanks, Aïda   > mod_1<-lmer(sur15~soeviv15_4plus+frviv15_4plus+frat_15death+dad_class_new+soeviv15_4plus:dad_class_new +frviv15_4plus:dad_class_new+

Hi all I am trying to generate a normal unbalanced data to estimate the coefficients of LM, LMM, GLM, and GLMM and their standard errors. Also, I am trying to estimate the variance components and their standard errors. Further, I am trying to use the likelihood ratio test to test H0: sigma^2_b = 0 (random effects variance component), and the t-test to test H0:mu=0 (intercept of the model Yij = mu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have the following data: > y [1] 0.000 0.004 0.008 0.016 0.024 0.032 0.044 0.064 0.072 0.088 0.108 0.140 [13] 0.156 0.180 0.208 0.236 0.264 0.296 0.320 0.360 0.408 0.444 0.472 0.524 [25] 0.576 > x [1] 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 [16] 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 I'd

So, in the ongoing saga of the unusual 1U short-depth workstation, we have narrowed the field to two choices. Both entrants are configured with 16GB memory (4x4GB), two 2.5" drives (1x250GB SSD and 1x1TB HDD), and an NVIDIA NVS510 graphic card (quad display): 1) SuperMicro 5017R-MF, Xeon E5-2609 processor 2) SuperMicro 5017C-LF, Xeon E3-1220 processor (I wish SuperMicro had a list of their

Hi, I am using clang::ToolInvocation class to compile some code in-memory: clang::tooling::ToolInvocation ti ( compilerArgs, new clang::EmitBCAction(), new clang::FileManager(clang::FileSystemOptions()) ); //filename is the name of the source file, e.g. "Somefile.cpp" //sourcecode contains the source of the file ti.mapVirtualFile( filename,

Hi, I have the following type of data: 86 subjects in three independent groups (high power vs low power vs control). Each subject solves 8 reasoning problems of two kinds: conflict problems and noconflict problems. I measure accuracy in solving the reasoning problems. To summarize: binary response, 1 within subject var (TYPE), 1 between subject var (POWER). I wanted to fit the following model:

Folks, The contour() function wants x and y to be in increasing order. I have a situation where I have a grid in x and y, and associated z values, which looks like this: x y z [1,] 0.00 20 1.000 [2,] 0.00 30 1.000 [3,] 0.00 40 1.000 [4,] 0.00 50 1.000 [5,] 0.00 60 1.000 [6,] 0.00 70 1.000 [7,] 0.00 80 0.000 [8,] 0.00 90

Hi, We installed the latest 1.4.24 on a test machine and can't get zaptel nor dahdi compile. It's a Linux Debian Etch. Errors we have: keewi:/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4# make make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-custom.2/build ARCH=i386 SUBDIRS=/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4/drivers/dahdi DAHDI_INCLUDE=/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4/include DAHDI_MODULES_EXTRA=" " HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes

Hello, I run a debian etch server with the mail services configured like their: http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-etch/ It worked during month but of the last upgrade it doesn't work anymore when postfix calls deliver. dovecot version is 1.0.rc15. I don't remember which was the previous version. There is no error accessing dovecot in any other way. Here my configuration: #

Hi, I am using R to do a principal components analysis for a class which is generally using SPSS - so some of my question relates to SPSS output (and this might not be the right place). I have scoured the mailing list and the web but can't get a feel for this. It is annoying because they will be marking to the SPSS output. Basically I'm getting different values for the component