similar to: Big O, little o

I want to form a 3x3 crosstabulation for the signs of two vectors (i.e. Negative, Zero, Positive). The problem is that I am simulating the data so for some iterations one of the categories is absent. Thus the resulting table shrinks to 3x2. I want it to be 3x3 with zero column corresponding to the missing category. Moreover, I have tried but failed to give the dimension names. -- Sohail Chand

On Jun 12, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John McCall wrote: > >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: >> >>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Sohail, >>>> >>>>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?

hi , i have downloaded the asterisk@home software from the web ..but i have a little confusion about that ...either i wrote in blank cd as it is or some bootable media is required for it...as it is in zip format...BUT it is a .ISO file ...tell me ...what should i do...it will run automatically when i reboot system and first boot device is CDROm...thankssss -- Muhammad Sohail Arham U.E.T. Lahore

Hi list, Is there a standards based reason why the DIFlags enum is set to uint32_t[1]? I am sure my DWARF-std-reading-fu is not up to snuff and so I cannot seem to find it. The reason I ask is that we are running out of space for our own DIFlags and would like to nail this down before deciding on an approach. Thanks! Sohail [1] The code in question:

On Jun 12, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Sohail Somani wrote: > On 11-06-12 7:40 PM, John McCall wrote: >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: >> >>>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Hi Sohail, >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous

Hi James, Please let me know how could I implement for sip.I will appreciate your help. Regards Akhilesh On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:01 PM, James Cass <jcass78 at gmail.com> wrote: > Akhilesh, > I have implemented several ec2 instances with both sip and iax2 and have > no problems with xlite or hard phones. Have you already opened the ports in > the vpc security group on the

Hi everyone, I am a new one for that lists....actually i have final year project on VOIP & IMS ...so i want to install asterisk on my pc ...IS it possble that ...we can call on small LAN network without buying any card...i will clear my point as that...suppose i have a linux machine on which i want to install asterisk and HOW it will install...and second point is that ..i have 2

On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Hi Sohail, >> >>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? >> >> not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the invoke >> instruction and attach exception handling information to basic blocks. See

On 11-06-12 7:40 PM, John McCall wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > >> > On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> > >>> >> Hi Sohail, >>> >> >>>> >>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? >>> >> >>> >> not currently. The

On Jun 12, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John McCall wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> >>> Hi Sohail, >>> >>>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? >>> >>> not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the

I am trying to use the lars package in R to carry out lasso analysis. However, I am having some problems. Please could you help me with the following questions: 1) Exactly what format do x and y need to be in for cv.lars(x, y) and lars (x, y)? And what information do x and y need to contain exactly? I have tried using to test just a simple matrix of numeric values for x and a simple vector of

Hi Thomas, Could you tell how can I change the protocol of corresponding port means 5060 is configured with tcp protocol I want to configured with udp. When I execute nmap -p5060 xx.xx.xx.xx I got below output [root at ip-172-31-32-117 cel]# nmap -p5060 xx.xx.xx.xx Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-04-21 11:19 UTC Nmap scan report for

On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Sohail, > >> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? > > not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the invoke > instruction and attach exception handling information to basic blocks. See > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExceptionHandlingChanges.txt > for a

Hi Guenther, When I executed nmap -p5060 <xx.xx.xx.xx> I got below output. [root at ip-172-31-32-117 cel]# nmap -p5060 xx.xx.xx.xx Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-04-21 11:19 UTC Nmap scan report for ec2-xx-xx-xx-xx.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com (xx.xx.xx.xx) Host is up (0.00080s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE 5060/tcp filtered sip Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host

+some of the debug info cabal (& Duncan, as an emeritus member, and person who plumbed a lot of the current debug info syntax support in) Visitor seems plausible though I haven't looked at the code in detail to see if it'd work perfectly. On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:56 AM Sohail Somani (Fizz Buzz Inc.) via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > [Resending due to

Hi Sohail, > Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the invoke instruction and attach exception handling information to basic blocks. See http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExceptionHandlingChanges.txt for a discussion. Ciao, Duncan.

> On May 29, 2018, at 15:33, Sohail Somani (Fizz Buzz Inc.) <sohail at fizzbuzzinc.com> wrote: > > Thanks all for your response. > > On Tue, May 29, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: >> >> >>> On May 29, 2018, at 12:55, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On May 29,

On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > On Jun 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, John McCall wrote: >> >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> >>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John McCall wrote: >>> >>>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM,

> On May 29, 2018, at 12:28 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > +some of the debug info cabal (& Duncan, as an emeritus member, and person who plumbed a lot of the current debug info syntax support in) > > Visitor seems plausible though I haven't looked at the code in detail to see if it'd work perfectly. > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:56

Thanks all for your response. On Tue, May 29, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: > > >> On May 29, 2018, at 12:55, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On May 29, 2018, at 12:28 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +some of the debug info cabal (& Duncan, as an