similar to: "Goto" loop

I'm very new to R and utterly blown away by not only the language but the unbelievable set of packages and the documentation and the documentation standards and... I was an early APL user and never lost my love for it and in R I find most of the essential things I loved about APL except for one thing. At this early stage of my learning I can't yet determine if there is a way to

Hi All Apologies if this is obvious, but I''m a bit flaky around SSL certificates. NB puppet version 0.25.5 We use the brilliant feature of certificates where you can have Alternate DNS names for a certificate which is manifested in the puppet master config file as certdnsnames. All our clients connect to puppet-$ location.example.com, and if $location is down, we can point the CNAME to

Dear Guys and Girls, I have two group of tinc nodes, say A and B. The network quality between A and B is unstable. I am wondering what algorithm tinc is using for delivering and relaying packets. How does one tinc node decide which the "next hop" is when its destination can not be reached directly or too slow to reach directly? The real situation is like this, nodes in group A and B

hi, hi, good morning everyone. I have a time series with binary outputs like : 0001011110100.................etc. Now I want to forecast the future values of that. Can anyone please tell me whether there is any tools exist in literature for dealing with this kind of binary observation? If possible please provide me some good references in net as well. rgd, Megh

FYI there is now serious talk of the Linux kernel dropping support for compilers that *don't* support asm goto. On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 13:13 -0700, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On Apr 4, 2017, at 11:44 AM, John McCall via llvm-dev > > ts.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 4, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> > >

On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 16:26 +0000, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:07 AM Yatsina, Marina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Asm goto feature was introduces to GCC in order to optimize the > > support for tracepoints in Linux kernel (it can be used for other > > things that do nop patching). > >   > > GCC

I have 2 vecros : x<-c(100,96,88,100,100,96,80,68,92,96,88,92,68,84,84,88,72,88,72,88) x1 = sample(x, 5, replace=FALSE) Now i want to get remaining values of vector "x" those are not member of vector "x1". Can anyone please tell me how to do that?

Linux kernel is using the “asm goto” feature, other projects probably use it as well. I think it provides motivation to support it in LLVM. Regarding the complexity, I believe there is some infrastructure that we can at least partially reuse (the support for “indirectbr” instruction). My focus is adding “asm goto” support, the other things are indeed completely orthogonal and came up in bugs

Hi, I have created a list object like that : x = vector("list") for (i in 1:5) x[[i]] = rnorm(2) x Now I want to do two things : 1. for each i, I want to do following matrix calculation : t(x[[i]]) %*% x[[i]] i.e. for each i, I want to get a 2x2 matrix 2. Next I want to get x[[1]] + x[[2]] +.... I did following : res=vector("list"); res = sapply(x, function(i) t(x[[i]]) %*%

Hi to all if someone of you is interested on it, i've changed the code of app_asr.c With these patch you can use the ASR application to play DTMF tones, so you can have your own AGI application that uses the ASR and manages the DTMF tones without change the dialplan. EXAMPLE exten => 003,1,Ringing exten => 003,2,Wait(3) exten => 003,3,Answer exten =>

Hi, i have been running R 2.11 compiles with the goto blas libraries successfully for about a year. I am running Ubuntu 10.10 64 bit. However, recently I have been periodically getting a segfault when running R (and numpy -- also compiled against goto blas). When I check the dmesg error log I get the following message R[28792]: segfault at 7f4183ed4000 ip 00007f4196f05f03 sp 00007f4192d55d20

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:31:22AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > > If you ever get to the point where it makes sense to build a kernel with > > LLVM [...] > > Just to speak to this point in particular: it makes sense to build > kernels with LLVM right now. It's already happened;

* Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org> wrote: > To quantify it: I just performed a test build of a Linux distro kernel config > (Fedora x86-64), and counted the number of callsites that use 'asm goto' > functionality with the v4.15 kernel (including drivers). > > The results: > > Linux distro | !CONFIG_TRACING

Code cleanup. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/isoinfo.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/isoinfo.c b/daemon/isoinfo.c index c0ee1c9..fd777bd 100644 --- a/daemon/isoinfo.c +++ b/daemon/isoinfo.c @@ -255,8 +255,6 @@ isoinfo (const char *path) goto done; ret = parse_isoinfo (lines); - if (ret == NULL) - goto done;

Hello, guys. You know LLVM C backend emits 'goto' statement for branching, being based on the bytecode which is composed of units of the basic block. Therefore, I wonder if it would be hard to modify the C backend so as to spits out functions instead of 'goto' statements for branching. I'm just a novice so I have no good sense on this if this would be feasible. How do you

There is a paper from Andew Appel: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=278285 it explains the connection between SSA basic blocks and functions pretty well. This paper may also help: http://www.jantar.org/papers/ssa-lambda/ Cheers, Gabor

Hello, There's been a flurry of activity around indrect goto recently. For anyone interested, here's a document explaining the curent design: http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IndirectGoto.txt Dan

Is goto from inline asm supported in LLVM 2.8 ? I am searching for something similar to what gcc 4.5 does: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#Extended%20asm%20with%20goto http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#Extended%20asm%20with%20goto which allows jumping from inline assembly to a label defined in C. I want to jump from inline asm to a basic block in LLVM.

I have two possible senarios for making a call from an AGI.. Senario1 - Using GoTo In the extensions.conf I have.. [dial-out] exten => _9.,1,AGI(myagi) exten => _9.,2,Dial(SIP/blah/${EXTEN:1}) In the AGI I have.. EXEC GoTo dial-out|9555678|2 So using this method I don't have to really edit the AGI ever if I change the dialplan around as long at the context is correct.. At the end of

I'm working on setting up a macro that will allow users to call their own DID number, and when they hear their voicemail greeting hit the * key and be prompted for their password to check vmail. For some reason though the background command isn't working as I'd expect it to: [macro-vmessage] exten => s,1,Answer exten =>