similar to: R Map using SAS data

Hi there, I have a yearly data from 1990-2030. The tick marks only show every five years. I want to add another tick mark at 2008 since data beyond that are predicted. How can I just add one tick mark to the X axis? Thank you. Best, Jacky _________________________________________________________________ Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail®.

Hello, for my meta-analysis I try to test if two varainces are equal without using the raw scores. I have is the SD's, N's and the Means. I want to test the variances from dependent and independend samples. I assume I can use the var.test procedure for the independent samples, but what about the dependent samples ? Has anyone an idea how to realise this with R ? Thanks in advance

Hi, I have a two-way anova with unequal cell numbers that I want to analyze. The problem is I don't have individual observations of the data. I only have the sufficient statistics (mean, variance, # of observations) for each cell. Is there any existing function in S-plus that would allow me to do aov() with the sufficient statistics? The table is like G1 G2 G3 G5 G6 T1 T2 T3

Hello everyone, I want to get a 1km by lkm grid raster image using my csv data. If I call latitude=a, longitude=b and preciptation=c. a<-(1,2,3,4,5) b<-(6,7,8,9,10) c<-(10,20, 30,40, 50) Then I found an example in r help which goes like pts = read.table("file.csv",......) library(sp) library(rgdal) proj4string(pts)=CRS("+init=epsg:4326") # set it to lat-long pts =

Hello, I have a file with two dependent variables (three and five) and one independent variable. I do i.mod <- lm(cbind(three, five) ~ species, data=i.txt) and get the following output: Coefficients: three five (Intercept) 9.949 9.586 species -1.166 -1.156 I do a" i.can<-candisc(i.mod,data=i): and get the following output: Canonical Discriminant Analysis

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: n?o dispon?vel URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20080916/9ba9430c/attachment.pl>

Hi Chris, Thanks. I will see what I can do for this. Junjie On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 19, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Junjie Gu wrote: > >> Many compilers support per-loop pragma, such as loop unrolling (ie >> #pragma unroll=2).  Is there any LLVM project/effort going on >> in this area ? What is the expected

Hi I am using the heatmap function in package mva to look at large correlation matrices visually. Is there any way to "flip" the output of heatmap plot left-right so that, if presented with a correlation matrix, it plots the unity elements in the correlation matrix along a diagonal from top left to bottom right? For example: library(mva) x = matrix(rnorm(1000), ncol=10) z = cor(x)

I'd like to add a pragma support in llvm. I am thinking about using a llvm intrinsic to represent each pragma, such as llvm.pragma (metadata, ...) where metadata describes a pragma. So if an application has: #pragma p1 .. #pragma p2... for (...) The llvm IR would be llvm.pragma (metadata..) // for p1 llvm.pragma (metadata..) // for p2 llvm IR for "for

Hello [R]-help I am trying to find > a package where you can do ANOVA based trend analysis on grouped data > using orthogonal polynomial contrasts coefficients, for unequally > spaced factor levels. The closest hit I've had is from this web site: >(http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xN4K_KGuYGcJ:www.datavis.ca/sasmac/orpoly.html+Orthogonal+polynomial >l but I

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Junjie Gu <jgu222 at gmail.com> wrote: > Any suggestions/ideas ? IIUC, Chris suggested something like following ... header: br i1 %x, label %then, %label endif then: ... br i1 %y, label %loop_exit, label %header, !loop_pragma !1 endif: ... br i1 %z, label %loop_exit, label %header, !loop_pragma !2 loop_exit: ret i32 1 Where !1 and !2 are the

Many compilers support per-loop pragma, such as loop unrolling (ie #pragma unroll=2). Is there any LLVM project/effort going on in this area ? What is the expected way for implementing per-loop pragma, or general pragma ? Suggestions/comments ? Thanks Junjie

I have a MDNode, and one of its operand is an int. I'd like to assign a new int value to that operand during the llvm optimization. What is the right way to do this ? (There is no setOperand() with MDNode class.) Junjie

I have TOT of llvm and it builds 64-bit without issues on my 64-bit ubuntu. My question is how to build 32-bit llvm on my 64-bit ubuntu ? I've not found any configure options to specify that. Thanks Junjie

What is the difference between WeakAnyLinkage and ExternalWeakLinkage ? They are defined in GlobalValue.h. Thanks Junjie

Thanks for comments/suggestions. Yes, attaching metadata to instructions will be good choices for many cases. But for loops, attaching metadata to back-edges requires that the front end to build loops, which is an additional task for the front end. And this task is really a backend's job, not the front end's. If the only concern is that it is hard for pragma intrinsics to stay with their

Dear R-list, I apologize for my many emails but I think I know how to desctribe my problem differently and more clearly. My question is how to compare linear models with intercept and those without intercept using maximizing adjusted R^2 strategy. Now I do it like the following: > library(leaps) > n=20 > x=matrix(rnorm(n*3),ncol=3) > b=c(1,2,0) > intercept=1 >

I am having trouble getting the rgal package to work on Mac OS X. I suspect it has something to do with the link between the rgal package and the associated programs GDAL and PROJ4. Here is the message I get when I attempt to load rgal > library("rgdal") Error in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...) : unable to load shared object

On May 19, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Junjie Gu wrote: > Many compilers support per-loop pragma, such as loop unrolling (ie > #pragma unroll=2). Is there any LLVM project/effort going on > in this area ? What is the expected way for implementing per-loop > pragma, or general pragma ? Suggestions/comments ? Hi Junjie, I don't know of anyone working on it, but it seems like a natural

On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Junjie Gu wrote: > I have a MDNode, and one of its operand is an int. I'd like to > assign a new int value to that operand during the llvm optimization. > What is the right way to do this ? (There is no setOperand() with > MDNode class.) Hi Junjie, MDNodes are uniqued, so you can't change them. Just make a new MDNode with the new operand list