similar to: Scripting in R -- pattern matching, logic, system calls, the works!

I want to make sure this piece of code I wrote is doing what I want it to do. ll<-function(string) { grep(string,dir(),value=T) } subdir = ll("Coverage_[1-9][0-9]$") I basically wrote a little function that would grab all the files of form Coverage_[0-99] The way I wrote it, will it grab Coverage_5 or does it have to have 2 numbers (10-99)? -- View this message in context:

I''m having a problem with multiple Ajax.Updater instances. I have five small chunks of data being loaded into my homepage, and they seem to be firing off one at a time. So the pieces load up in the order they were called. Maybe I''m being a noob, but shouldn''t all those requests just fire away and then place the content as it gets received? I was doing multiple versions,

Hello Friends!!! I would want draw a circular histogram, and I would like draw a polygon with a circular side. This is easy if I use the functions polygon and arc, but I want that the polygon with a circular side have background colour. The polygon created with function polygon can have background colour, but the surface created with function arc can?t have background colour. How I could create a

Hi, I would like to implement macro debug info support in LLVM. Below you will find 4 parts: 1. Background on what does it mean to debug macros. 2. A brief explanation on how to represent macro debug info in DWARF 4.0. 3. The suggested design. 4. A full example: Source -> AST -> LLVM IR -> DWARF. Feel free to skip first two parts if you think you know the background.

Hi, I'm trying to debug an R interface to a Fortran subroutine from Windows. (Yes, I know I should try Unix/Linux as well, but a quick attempt suggested that the (MinGW g77) Fortran compiler I have installed on my Windows laptop works better on this Fortran code.) I'm trying to follow the instructions in the "Writing R Extensions" Manual: Start R under the debugger after

Hi, I'm trying to debug an R interface to a Fortran subroutine from Windows. (Yes, I know I should try Unix/Linux as well, but a quick attempt suggested that the (MinGW g77) Fortran compiler I have installed on my Windows laptop works better on this Fortran code.) I'm trying to follow the instructions in the "Writing R Extensions" Manual: Start R under the debugger after

> Do we really need to touch the AST? Or would it be reasonable to wire up the CGDebugInfo directly to the PPCallbacks, if it isn't already? (perhaps it is already wired up for other reasons?) This sound as a good idea, I will check that approach. PPCallbacks is only an interface, has nothing connected to it, but we will create a new class, which implement PPCallbacks, for macros. So we can

> Not necessarily, if we kept the macros in order in the list of macros attached to the CU, which I imagine we would. OK, now I understand what you are aiming for. I really do not favor one on the other. But, can you explain what is the advantage of the parent approach over the children approach? If any, the children approach seems to be the one reduces the LLVM IR size, is not it? Regards,

> Right - I was wondering if CGDebugInfo already implemented PPCallbacks or was otherwise being notified of PPCallback related things, possibly through a layer or two of indirection. I checked the approach of skipping representing macros in AST, and communicate them directly from Parser to CGDebugInfo. However, I could not find a way to initialize this communication. The only interface

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com> wrote: > I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them directly > in CGDebugInfo through PPCallbacks during preprocessing. > > To do that, I needed to extend ASTConsumer interface with this extra > method: > > > > /// If the consumer is interested in notifications from

Hi, I am using the mgcv package (version 1.7-22.) running the model works fine, but when I want to have a plot with residuals I get an error. fit29<-gam(IV~s(G3)+s(V3)+factor(AAR)+s(D3)+s(RUTE,bs="re"),data=subsf,gamma=1.4,method="ML") plot(fit29,residuals=T) Error in X[, first:last] %*% object$coefficients[first:last] : non-conformable arguments does some one know

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:21 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them

On 08/01/2018 02:00 PM, Graham Hunter wrote: > Hi Hal, > >> On 30 Jul 2018, at 20:10, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> >> >> On 07/30/2018 05:34 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >>> I strongly suspect that there remains widespread concern with the direction of this, I know I have them. >>> >>> I don't think that many of the

I'd like to jump in. I do not work on a preprocessor based language, but have the same code expansion problem to encode. Right now, we hack around the problem by appending some prefix after the file name and pretend it is a different file, which is not great. I understand you want to represent expansion by DIFileMacro ? I'm not how this is supposed to be used and it is not in the example.

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at linux.intel.com> Move the MCONFIG files into a mk/ directory and give them more descriptive names. This is purely a cosmetic change to make the 'include' directives a bit more coherent by making it obvious exactly which MCONFIG file we're including. For example, in com32/lua/src/Makefile we exchange the line, include ../../MCONFIG for the

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at linux.intel.com> This series includes a patch (PATCH 1/6) that I sent previously but I thought it was worth sending it again since the rest of the series depends on it, and it also gives a bit of context. These cleanups make it simpler to do the big switchover to ELF modules on the elflink branch because the libraries in $LIBS are now contained in one

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934 Summary: Traverse-only directories (e.g. chmod 110) break the cd command in sftp Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6.1p2 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: sftp-server AssignedTo:

FreeBSD-12 Dovecot-2.3.5 I am having problems with one use Mar 25 21:30:12 imap(gau.mon at crownkenya.com)<91364><U7qCZO+ECfCaRh6E>: Fatal: master: service(imap): child 91364 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) Mar 25 21:30:14 imap(gau.mon at crownkenya.com)<2381><moHYZO+EDvCaRh6E>: Fatal: master: service(imap): child 2381 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) Mar 26 06:29:26

Hello, This is a patch to allow building of the project using MSYS, MinGW, and MinGW-w64 with the following invocation: make -f Makefile.lite libFLAC libFLAC++ flac metaflac test_libs_common test_libFLAC test_libFLAC++ test_grabbag test_seeking test_streams utils examples This patch addresses eight points: 1. `uname -p` in MSYS returns "unknown" so we must use `gcc -dumpmachine`

Hello, This is a patch to allow building of the project using MSYS, MinGW, and MinGW-w64 with the following invocation: make -f Makefile.lite libFLAC libFLAC++ flac metaflac test_libs_common test_libFLAC test_libFLAC++ test_grabbag test_seeking test_streams utils examples This patch addresses eight points: 1. `uname -p` in MSYS returns "unknown" so we must use `gcc -dumpmachine`