similar to: creating table of averages

On Oct 5, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >>> In addition, merging the tools will allow the consolidation of >>> target-specific code in OPT. There is code in InstCombine, for >>> example, that specifically deals with x86 intrinsics. This code >>> should be moved into a callback provided by the x86 target. >>> Currently,

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > The more I think about it, the more I become uncomfortable with the > concept of language-specific address spaces in LLVM.  These are the > main issues I see with language-specific address spaces: ... > Instead of language-specific address spaces, each target should > concentrate on

On Oct 5, 2012, at 1:13 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 5, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >>>> In addition, merging the tools will allow the consolidation of >>>> target-specific code in OPT. There is code in InstCombine, for >>>> example, that specifically deals with x86 intrinsics.

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com> > Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 1:49:51 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM Loop Vectorizer >

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:55:33PM -0500, Ken Dyck wrote: > The address space mechanism is used by some code generators to > differentiate between physical memory spaces. The PIC16 code generator > uses address spaces 0 and 1 to select between its RAM and ROM spaces. > And X86 uses address space 256 for GS and 257 for FS. In the back end > for a dual-harvard DSP that I've been

Good day to you, Who Are We? Downloadable Software (DS) is a rapidly growing company providing high quality software. You've come to the right place if you need professionally implemented programming solutions for your usage. Thousands of satisfied customers have already benefited from our products and solutions. Hundreds are joining this community every day. Our Mission To deliver

Good day to you, Who Are We? Downloadable Software (DS) is a rapidly growing company providing high quality software. You've come to the right place if you need professionally implemented programming solutions for your usage. Thousands of satisfied customers have already benefited from our products and solutions. Hundreds are joining this community every day. Our Mission To deliver

Hi, Does anyone know any tool that can help generate a control/data flow graph (CDFG) for LLVM IR programs? The opt -view-cfg and related commands can visualize a program as a control flow graph. But how can I embody data flow information into that graph? Your help will be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Wenhao Jia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nadav Rotem" <nrotem at apple.com> > To: "Andrew Trick" <atrick at apple.com> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 3:20:04 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM Loop Vectorizer > >

please excuse me if this ones a basic error > y<-c(-0.7,-0.6,-0.5) > -0.7^1.22 [1] -0.6471718 > y^1.22 [1] NaN NaN NaN am I missing something important in my basic math?

Hi. I need some advises on how to use R to find pi (i is the index) with the following objective function and constraint: max (sum i)[ f(ai, bi, pi) * g(ci, di, pi) * Di ] s.t. (sum i)[ f(ai, bi, pi) * Di * pi] / (sum i)[ f(ai, bi, pi) * Di ] <= constant f and g are diffentiable. So, I am thinking of optim with method = "BFGS"? But wonder how to include the

Smack my curiosity, but I encoded some songs in Vorbis mode 2 and tried to be able to distinguish the difference between that and the uncompressed WAVs. (*smacks self*) but here's what I noted: It's actually kind of hard to tell the difference :) (and I consider myself to have a decent set of ears, though not anywhere near the best) I got my accuracy to about 90%, but I couldn't

Greg, I'm going to join issue with your here! Not that I'll go near advocating "Excel-style" graphics (abominable, and the Patrick Burns URL which you cite is remarkable in its restraint). Also, I'm aware that this is potential flame-war territory -- again, I want to avoid that too. However, this is the second time you have intervened on this theme (previously Mon 6

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:06 PM, David Neto wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote: >> >> The more I think about it, the more I become uncomfortable with the >> concept of language-specific address spaces in LLVM.  These are the >> main issues I see with language-specific address spaces: > > ... > >> Instead of language-specific