similar to: Articles about comparision between R and others softwares

Hi, I've been setting up * recently and slowly getting to grips with it, however I'm getting rather confused with all the different configs for IAX calls, FWD calls iaxtel etc etc. What I think I need it a basic understanding or even a comparison of these different voip systems (if thats what they are?) I'd like to be able to make calls to other voip users, both in the UK and abroad

Hi, it looks like Ferret still compares numeric fields by lexical ordering, not numerical ordering. I am using Ferret 0.11.4(I tried in both linux and windows, the results are the same). index = Ferret::Index::Index.new() docs = [ {:num => 1, :data => "yes"}, {:num => 1, :data => "no"}, {:num => 10, :data => "yes"}, {:num => 10, :data

On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd at quip.cz> wrote: > I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config, > but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they > are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and Dragonfly BSD. I wonder

On Nov 17, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Evan, > >> Thanks David. Unfortunately many of us cannot use GPL v3 gcc so it's hard for us >> to investigate this. One question, can you tell if gcc is inlining significantly >> more than llvm? We have reports that this is one of the issue plaguing eon >> performance. > > are you allowed to look at

Some praise: Timo, I must say I am super impressed with this product. I do free support a few good friends with small businesses running Linux servers (a mix of RH9, Suse9.2 and gentoo) that I dropped as email and samba servers. I found UW-IMAP to be terrible in every way except that using mbox is sometimes nice for old s/w tools. No need for details re UW-IMAP problems. In early 2004 I found

Dear R-list, Could anybody tell me (or give me a tip) of how to implement the Duncan distribution in R? I've been trying to make a new and more flexible function for multiple comparison of means: Tukey, SNK and Duncan, from 'aov' objects, like TukeyHSD function. For while, it is running nice (Tukey and SNK), for simple design (completely randomized, randomized block and Latin

Dear All, I am using R and I am putting my problem in form of an example: X<-c(128,34,153,987,345,45,3454,23,123) I want to remove the entries which are lesser than 100(? How to compare every element with 100 and how to create subsets ) and I need two vectors y and z s.t y<-c(entries < 100) z<- c(remaining entries) Moreover, Please tell me which command to use if I want to use

Hi Evan, > Thanks David. Unfortunately many of us cannot use GPL v3 gcc so it's hard for us > to investigate this. One question, can you tell if gcc is inlining significantly > more than llvm? We have reports that this is one of the issue plaguing eon > performance. are you allowed to look at assembler output by GPL v3 gcc? If so, maybe someone else can do the compiling for you,

Thanks David. Unfortunately many of us cannot use GPL v3 gcc so it's hard for us to investigate this. One question, can you tell if gcc is inlining significantly more than llvm? We have reports that this is one of the issue plaguing eon performance. There are also some relatively well known spec optimizations that we haven't implemented. e.g.

In my efforts to convince people to hear how good Vorbis is when compared to MP3, I'm gonna be encoding tracks from my CD collection to both formats, then writing them to audio CD, so people don't have to install extra software to hear the difference. Has anyone got some suggested specs for the options for MP3 encoding when using CDex or Chun-Yu's MP3 writer for winamp (preferably in

Hi, I have looked at the LLVM code generation quality using small test cases and in general it is better than I thought and in some cases better than gcc. However, there are still some gap in SPEC performance. I have not looked at the root cause of those gaps. Anyone who cares about LLVM performance need to take this seriously. For fair comparison, I used -fno-strict-aliasing in gcc to turn off

Hi, It looks like I have found a bug in LLD. Suppose DSO defines a global variable 'data' and initializes it by the address of function 'set_data' defined in the same DSO. If an executable file (linked by LLD) gets address of the '&set_data' function and compares it with a value stored in the 'data' variable it gets different result. If the executable is linked

I'm the beginner for IMAP/POP3 servers. I'm starting to use Dovecot. But I'm confusing between Courier-IMAP and Dovecot. Anyone tell me some quick tips regarding this issue. What's the better and what's the worst thing comparing these two IMAP/POP3 servers? I think the Dovecot is good enough for security and performance issue over Courier. Is it right? And how about the feature

Hello, I have been using successfully Dovecot 1.1.x for about a year now. It has been very stable. Now I'm uprading that same system to newer and more powerful hardware and I was wondering whether it is good idea or not to switch to Dovecot 1.2.x series. Could anybody direct me to feature comparision document or explain here main differences betweeen thos two branches? -- Veiko

Yes, I had just reduced it too. I am pretty sure this was implemented at some point. Taking a look. Cheers, Rafael On 8 February 2016 at 17:52, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds like it is related to this: > > http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/42 > """ > > The fact that C permits taking the address of a function introduces an >

hello all! After having read http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/listen.html and listened to the examples on that very educational page, I decided to augment the info. This example is more simple, it involves the comparision between two streams of the same radio station, FranceInter (a station of Radio France in Paris). The ogg stream is running at around 30 kbps/11 kHz in stereo. The WMA stream

How can I perform a Student-Newman-Keuls-Test for multiple comparision of means in R? (I did not manage to find any specific function in the libraries) Jörg Peter Baresel Technische Universität München Institut für Ackerbau und INformatik im Pflanzenbau D-85354 Freising Lange Point 51 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all using the orthogonal polymial on a set of data, I get an approximate density which basically is in the form: exp(-polynomial), as you know, the parameters are the converged coeeficients. obviously, It is hard, if not impossible, to use the inverse CDF method to get a sample and then plot density. then how can I plot the approximated density in order to have a graphical comparision

Hello , i want to create a script that should automatically free the proxy partition i.e /var. I am able to create that script. But the problem is that i don't know through which variables i can check my partition's space that show me full detail i.e remaining size, etc. One for that is df -h and other fdisk -l /dev/hdxx. But when i will use if state then which

Hi, I'm designing a experiment in order to compare the growing of several clones of a tree specie. It will be a complete randomized block design. How can I decide what model of mean comparision to choose? LSD, HSD,TukeyHSD, Duncan,...? Thanks in advance