similar to: list

Dear everyone, I am trying to do a Wilcoxon one-sided test on my gene expression data. These are the data i have in R: data.matrix (matrix, numeric) containing all gene expression data (42 rows=genes, 42 columns=tumors), no column header or row names data.cl (vector, numeric) consisting of 42 0's and 1's to indicate class 0 or class 1 for each column in data.matrix I want to do a

>>>>> Karolis Koncevi?ius >>>>> on Mon, 9 Dec 2019 23:43:36 +0200 writes: > So I tried adding Infinity support for all cases. > And it is (as could be expected) more complicated than I thought. "Of course !" Thank you, Karolis, in any case! > It is easy to add Inf support for the test. The problems start with conf.int=TRUE.

Thank you for a fast response. Nice to see this mailing list being so alive. Regarding Inf issue: I agree with your assessment that Inf should not be removed. The code gave me an impression that Inf values were intentionally removed (since is.finite() was used everywhere, except for paired case). I will try to adjust my patch according to your feedback. One more thing: it seems like you

I have a question concerning the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and specifically, which R subroutine I should use for my particular dataset. There are three different commands in R (that I'm aware of) that calculate the Wilcoxon signed-rank test; wilcox.test, wilcox.exact, and wilcoxsign_test. When I run the three commands on the same dataset, I get different p-values. I'm hoping that

The function 'wilcox.test' in R and S gives (almost) identical results (see below). 'qwilcox' however, does not: > qwilcox(p,5,5) p: 0.025 0.975 -------------------- R> 3 22 S> 18 37 I originally wanted to ask a questions, but then I found the answer. Given the confusion I run into, I wonder if this experience is worth reporting. The

I get these BIZARRE results from wilcox.test() When INCREASING the number of samples i get INCREASED p-values. When increasing the number of samples further, the p-values goes down again. This seems really bizarre! Can anyone explain why this is so?! Example: > w <- wilcox.test(c(1:40),(c(1:40)+100)) > w$p.value [1] 1.860340e-23 > w <- wilcox.test(c(1:50),(c(1:50)+100)) >

how do I check the rank of a matrix ? say A= 1 0 0 0 1 0 then rank(A)=2 what is this function? thanks I did try help.search("rank"), but all the returned help information seem irrelevant to what I want. I would like to know how people search for help information like this. rank(base) Sample Ranks SignRank(stats) Distribution of the

Hello, I use t.test for normal distributed and wilcox.test for non-normal distributed samples. It is easy to write a function for t.test that calculates the effect size, because all parts of the formula are available from the t.test result: r = sqrt(t*t / (t*t + df)) However, for Wilcoxon tests, the formula for effect sizes is: r = Z / sqrt(N) I wonder how I can calculate the Z-score in R for

Hello, Writing to share some things I've found about wilcox.test() that seem a a bit inconsistent. 1. Inf values are not removed if paired=TRUE # returns different results (Inf is removed): wilcox.test(c(1,2,3,4), c(0,9,8,7)) wilcox.test(c(1,2,3,4), c(0,9,8,Inf)) # returns the same result (Inf is left as value with highest rank): wilcox.test(c(1,2,3,4), c(0,9,8,7), paired=TRUE)

Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?... Nom : non disponible URL : <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20081112/618073fe/attachment.pl>

>> I have a function that applies a wilcoxon test to 12 sets of about a quarter of a million pairs > ... and let me guess: everything is significiant to an almost arbitrary > value of \alpha? :-) For each of quarter of a million sets, I do a wilcoxon between two pairs each containing twenty numbers... I do this 12 times... > > (and takes about 3 hours). I've replaced the

Help needed! Has anyone access to StatXact? I just hacked exact two-sided p-values for rank tests (for package exactDistr, which will move to CRAN/contrib as exactRankTests soon ;-) and would like to compare the results of my implementation to that of StatXact. Could someone please calculate the exact one-sided (both greater and less) and two-sided p-values? # Data from the StatXact-4 manual,

Dear List, after updating the exactRanksumTests package I receive a warning that the package is not developed any further and that one should consider the coin package. I don't find the signed rank test in the coin package, only the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U-Test. I only found a signed rank test in the stats package (wilcox.test) which is able to calculate the exact pvalues but unfortunately

When I use wilcox.test, I get vastly different p-values than the problems from Statistics textbooks. For example: The following problem comes from "Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers", 2nd Edition, by D. C. Montgomery. Page736, problem 14.7. The problem is to compare the sample data with a population median of 8.5. The book answer is p = 0.25, wilcox.test answer is p =

Hi, I have a data set: > Dataset X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 1 user1 m 22 19 28 24 12 18 9 7 4 5 4 7 5 7 9 2 user2 f 25 19 23 18 18 15 6 8 6 6 7 10 7 7 7 3 user3 f 28 21 24 18 15 12 10 6 7 9 5 10 5 9 5 4 user4 f 26 19 26 21 12 18 6 6 5 1 3 8 6 5 6 5 user5 m 21 22 26 18 9 6 4 6 1

Hi all, I have a distribution, and take a sample of it. Then I compare that sample with the mean of the population like here in "Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction": > wilcox.test(Sample,mu=mean(All), alt="two.sided") Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction data: AlphaNoteOnsetDists V = 63855, p-value = 0.0002093 alternative hypothesis:

Por si alguno pudiera ayudarme. Al realizar el t.test para una muestra, junto con el valor de t y el p-valor, la función proporciona la estimación de la media y su INTERVALO DE CONFIANZA. Desde el punto de vista de la estadística de rangos esto se puede hacer mediante: > iris$MEDIANA <- with(iris, 2.95) > median(iris$Sepal.Width - iris$MEDIANA, na.rm=TRUE) # median difference [1]

Hi I have 2 sets of data that I want to do a Wilcoxon test on. They are of the same dimension. One has 4 zero values and the other has 5. > dim(SampA) [1] 1 10 > dim(SampV) [1] 1 10 I get the folowing error Error in wilcox.test.default(SampA, SampV, na.rm = TRUE, paired = FALSE, : 'x' must be numeric I am using the function wilcox.test(SampA, SampV, na.rm=TRUE,

Hi, We recently dumped a Xorcom box that was no end of trouble and replaced with a Digium G100.  PRI came right up, and we have been using it fairly flawlessly for several months now, with one caveat.  Calls that arrive from the PRI are sent to the asterisk instance (13.23.1, chan_sip), then routed by the dialplan to various other gateways or upstream providers.  When the call finally lands

Hi. I'm going to introduce the R-package for a group of medical doctors later this week and is a little confused about there use of a test named "willcoxon-pratt" for testing if the clinical and biochemical markers has decreased significantly after the use of some drugs for a group of patients. Looking into the R-functions I would in R recommand using a matched-pairs Wilcoxon