similar to: Access to values of function arguments

I am attempting to get publication quality graphs using R on Ubuntu. I encounter lots of problems in using cex to control font size: for instance cex=1.5 results in very blocky characters. I then tried to use res=1200 while creating a PNG file, hoping that this would solve the problem, but it did not. When doing the above, a second problem appeared: the font size relative to the graphics decreased

LLVM-2.6 takes 3s from OCamlbuild, but the lastest LLVM (I am using r95712) takes 34s. I attached the code. But the new LLVM fixed a problem of dispose_module in 2.6. I got this error in 2.6, but the new LLVM works well. While deleting: [14 x i8]* %greeting An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! UNREACHABLE executed at

I''d like to create expectations on just portions of the arguments a function takes. For example, I want to verify that the a certain ActiveRecord association extension adds an order clause to the find options hash. Currently I simply check the entire argument structure, something like this def test_referring_journals_should_order_by_citation_count article =

Just search online why in general that is insecure via CLI vs programmatic for first class automation.. there is a reason why snmp, rest, ... exist. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > You've mentioned security issues in your previous email, but now you're > hopping to management issues. > > Have you tried Ansible, Chef or

Programmatic management with first class APIs is preferred for larger deployments.. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > Could you elaborate on why CLI (SSH) managing is insecure? > > > Tomasz Chmielewski > https://lxadm.com > > > On 2018-03-27 04:23, al so wrote: > >> So, for remote manageability of Tinc, we

? Sat, 17 Feb 2024 11:15:43 -0700 "Reed A. Cartwright" <racartwright at gmail.com> ?????: > I'm wrapping a function in R and I want to record all the arguments > passed to it, including default values and missing values. This is hard if not impossible to implement for the general case because the default arguments are evaluated in the environment of the function as it

R-Developers, I'm looking for some help computing on the R language. I'm hoping to write a function that parses a language or expression object and returns another expression with all instances of certain argument of a given function altered. For instance, say I would like my function, myFun to take an expression and whenever the argument 'x' appears within the function FUN inside

Am a Linux guy and trying to support security monitoring for Windows devices. Am trying to find a programmatic way of pulling security and application logs from Windows machine. OR it can be a push model where windows can generate events/traps. It should all be built-in in windows with no external tool installation. Looks like there is no NATIVE built in asynchronous event

When using LLVM as a JIT compiler, you can use module.dump() to show the generated intermediate code, which is good. Is there similarly a programmatic way to show the generated x64 machine code in assembly format? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160406/c7d22dab/attachment.html>

The assignment form of 'formals' strips attributes (or something close to that) from the values in the list. This wasn't intentional, was it? The current behavior (2.0.0 through 2.1.0 on Windows at least): > fjj <- function() x > formals(fjj) <- list(x=c(a=2, b=4)) > fjj function (x = c(2, 4)) x Previous behavior: > fjj <- function() x > formals(fjj)

There seems to be a bug arising when using multiple S4 generics with "..." as the signature. The following code works as expected: ############################################################## > setGeneric("rbind", function(..., deparse.level=1) standardGeneric("rbind"), + signature = "...") Creating a generic for "rbind" in

Hi again, I am exploring if R can help me to get all possible combinations of members in a group. Let say I have a group with 5 members : A, B, C, D, E Now I want to generate all possible unique combinations with all possible lengths from that group e.g. 1st combination : A 2nd combination : B ..... 5th combination : E 6th combination : A, B 7th combination : B, C .... last combination: A, B,

So, for remote manageability of Tinc, we don't have any SNMP or REST like programmatic ways? If it is going to be CLI only, it is definitely not secure to manage and also not very convenient to manage programmatically. On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 02:16:20PM -0700, al so wrote: > > > > Is there

There is a reason most NMS systems used SNMP in the past and REST apis past 7+ years. They don't use CLIs except toy Expect type scripts.. Not just security but better error handling and more. Good luck learning! On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > SNMP is mainly used for monitoring, not _server_ automation. > > Also, it's

Al like any open-source or free sofware you need to put the leg work into what you want it to be. My company is actually creating something using TINC and we believe in it. If successful we'll be giving back to TINC monetarily in a big way to make TINC even better so if TINC isn't for you keep an eye on further developments in the future. Thanks, Rafael On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:03

Hello, Is there a standard programmatic way to manipulate yum configuration files, particularly the .repo files? I want to add things like "priority=..." per repo, or "check_obsoletes=1" to the priorities plugin config. I can cook specific search/append using perl or sed but was wondering whether there is a more elegant way. I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it

On 21/02/18 11:36, Spencer Graves wrote: > Hi, All: > > > ????? How can I get the names of all the arguments in dots(...)? > > > ????? I'm able to get the name of the first argument but not the second: > > > > deparseDots <- function(...){ > ? deparse(substitute(...)) > } > a <- 1 > b <- 2 > deparseDots(a, b) > [1]

Hi, All: ????? How can I get the names of all the arguments in dots(...)? ????? I'm able to get the name of the first argument but not the second: deparseDots <- function(...){ ? deparse(substitute(...)) } a <- 1 b <- 2 deparseDots(a, b) [1] "a" ????? I'd like to get c('a', 'b'). ????? Thanks, ????? Spencer Graves > sessionInfo() R

Hello. I was writing some code that computes on the language and came across this. I can work around it, but thought you might like to know about it. > f <- function(x) { NULL } > a <- as.list(f)[[1]] > a # ie print(a) Error: argument "a" is missing, with no default Note it says *argument* "a", which is strange. In fact, and unsurprisingly, the bug lies with

Hmm. Chuck: I don't see how this example represents incomplete/incommensurate recycling. Doesn't TRUE replicate from length-1 to length-3 in this case (mat[c(TRUE,FALSE),2] would be an example of incomplete recycling)? William: clever, but maybe too clever unless you really need the speed? (The clever way is 8 times faster in the following case ...) x <- rep(1,1e6)