similar to: Reading Multi-value data fields for descriptive analysis (resend)

Hello, I'm looking for help on the best approach to get "multi-value" data fields into R for simple descriptive analysis. ------------------------------------- I am new to this list and new to R, but I really want to get over the hump and get productive with it. Some help with how to best get the following data into R would be greatly appreciated. I have programming experience

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> We've previously had identical naming between vertex and texture formats, so it mostly made sense to define these together. However, upcoming patches are going to transition the driver over to using updated texture header definitions using NVIDIA's naming, and this will no longer be the case. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at

The voltage value are calculated by the hardware characterized result. Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> --- Resend this patch with the fuse change and proper patch prefix per Thierry's request. drm/Kbuild | 1 + drm/core/subdev/volt/gk20a.c | 1 + nvkm/engine/device/nve0.c | 1 + nvkm/include/subdev/volt.h | 1 + nvkm/subdev/clock/gk20a.c

Hi Roy, On 11/28/2014 07:25 PM, Roy Spliet wrote: > Hello Vince, > > One minor question inline. > > Op 28-11-14 om 12:13 schreef Vince Hsu: >> The voltage value are calculated by the hardware characterized >> result. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> >> --- >> >> Resend this patch with the fuse change and proper

Why not fix the new names instead to be like the old names? Seems like that would be way simpler... On Feb 15, 2016 12:38 AM, "Ben Skeggs" <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > > We've previously had identical naming between vertex and texture > formats, so it mostly made sense to define these together. > > However,

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/volt/gk20a.c:49: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/volt/gk20a.c:62: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > These are supported on GK20A and GM107. > > Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> > --- > > Was a bit torn on where to place the enums... we're about to gut all > the xml definitions so this seemed appropriate for now. > > Tested on GK20A only. > >

I sent this in with an old version, but it's in latest version as well. The fix is simple. In the summary.table function, the parameter is calculated incorrectly for a test of independence among all cells when the table is more than 2-way table. Example: Consider X: > X a b c 1 A1 B2 C1 2 A3 BA3 C2 3 A2 B1 C4 4 A1 B2 C3 5 A3 BA3 C2 6 A1 BA3 C1 7 A2 BA3 C2 8 A1

These are supported on GK20A and GM107. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Was a bit torn on where to place the enums... we're about to gut all the xml definitions so this seemed appropriate for now. Tested on GK20A only. src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_formats.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_screen.c | 10 ++++

SYSLINUX 2.10 2004-06-18 That is all I get when I boot my system off a CompactFlash card in an IDE adapter, no matter how long I wait. What debugging steps are recommended? I'm willing to get down and dirty with assembler, and I'd appreciate suggestions of what to suspect and where to start. Details: This is a Crucial 128MB CompactFlash card in a non-hot-swap CF-IDE adapter which

Hello I have a dataframe with 3 columns C1, C2 and C3. C1 and C2 are numerical data and C3 is the date of the data (format : %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S") With the lattice package, I would like to plot C1 as function of C2 sorted by the dates, that is something like : xyplot(C1 ~ C2 | as.Date(C3)) It plots somethings but not the truth. I have compared the output with the output of this script

Dear Tobias and all LLVM/Polly developers, Thank you very much for all your help and advice. I have submitted my proposal to GSoC 2013 application system: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/star/1. Some tables and paragraphs are simplified to make it more readable on GSoC official pages. Any suggestion or comment would be appreciated. At 2013-05-03

Hello Vince, One minor question inline. Op 28-11-14 om 12:13 schreef Vince Hsu: > The voltage value are calculated by the hardware characterized > result. > > Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> > --- > > Resend this patch with the fuse change and proper patch prefix > per Thierry's request. > > drm/Kbuild | 1 + >

On 05/03/2013 11:39 AM, Star Tan wrote: > Dear Tobias, > > > Thank you very much for your very helpful advice. > > > Yes, -debug-pass and -time-passes are two very useful and powerful > options when evaluating the compile-time of each compiler pass. They > are exactly what I need! With these options, I can step into details > of the compile-time overhead of each pass.

Dear all, A question on modelling proportional data in R. I have a test experiment that was designed in a particular way, and which I can analyse "by hand" to an extent. I am really struggling to get R to give me sensible results in modelling it "properly", so must be doing something wrong here. As background, I conduct a series of experiments and count the

I'm attempting to create an array of treatment comparisons for modelling data generation. This involves comparison of one treatment (c2) with another (c3), relative to a common comparator (c1). Attached code gives me the correct array but need to remove duplicates. Duplicates relate only to c2 and c3 such that I need to remove r3 because c2 and c3 are same as r1 with c2 and c3 swapped r5

Hello, Searching this forum has enabled me to get pretty far in what I'm trying to do. However, there is one more manipulation I would like to make and I haven't found a solution. Using the data and code below, I generate the plot produced by the last command. If possible I would like to reverse the order of the y-axis (bearing in mind horizontal=T) so that 0 is plotted at the upper

Dear useRs, Thanks for any advices # I do not know where are the examples how to mark groups # based on signal occurence in the additional variable: cf. variable c2, # How to calculate different calculations for groups defined by (split by occurence of c2 characteristic data) #First example of simple data #mexample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

[I originally sent this to R-bugs@stat.math.ethz.ch and it didn't bounce, but when I received no response I thought I had better check to see if I had the correct address.] System: Sun Solaris 2.5.1 R: Version 0.65.1 Release (October 07, 1999) There seem to be at least 2 bugs associated with the use of flush=T in the scan function. 1) If flush=T is used, scan() will only ask for 1 line from

If you wanted to do a t.test res1<-do.call(cbind,lapply(seq_len(nrow(m)),function(i) do.call(rbind,lapply(split(rbind(m[i,-1],n),1:nrow(rbind(m[i,-1],n))), function(x) {x1<- rbind(x,m[i,-1]); t.test(x1[1,],x1[2,])$p.value})))) ?res2<-do.call(cbind,lapply(seq_len(ncol(res1)),function(i) c(c(tail(res1[seq(1,i,1),i],-1),1),res1[-c(1:i),i]))) ?attr(res2,"dimnames")<-NULL ?res2