similar to: Regular expressions: bug or misunderstanding?

Using the host name of the volume, its related gluster commands can become very slow .For example,create,start,stop volume,nfs related commands. and some time And in some cases, the command will return Error : Request timed out but If using ip address to create the volume. The volume all gluster commands are normal. I have configured /etc/hosts correctly,Because,SSH can normally use the

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:30 PM, ?? <chenxi at shudun.com> wrote: > Using the host name of the volume, its related gluster commands can become > very slow .For example,create,start,stop volume,nfs related commands. and > some time And in some cases, the command will return Error : Request timed > out > but If using ip address to create the volume. The volume all gluster >

Sorry to bump up an old thread. 2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the error still gets generated.? Anything else we could try ? Scott On Wednesday, 19/08/2020 at 11:37 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Hi, > > after the upgrade to Dovecot 2.3.11.3, from 2.3.10.1, I see frequently > these errors from

Hi, Thank you for your reply. I hope this bug to be fixed soon. :) Thank you. Tachibana ----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:43:12 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 20:24:13 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote: > ... > > Thanks for the report. I reproduced it locally, but I'm not sure what is > > causing it yet.

Sorry about that. My FreeBSD system automatically applied your patches and I assumed they were already part of the master. Unfortunately it still means the bug isn't resolved with these changes. On Wednesday, 02/09/2020 at 15:34 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 15:07:37 -0400, Scott Q. wrote: > Sorry to bump up an old thread. > > 2.3.11.3 already

Hi I'm doing: doveadm force-resync -S director1:1234 -A "*" The director gives this error: Jul 06 16:17:29 auth: Error: Trying to iterate users, but userdbs don't support it Jul 06 16:17:29 doveadm: Error: User listing returned failure Jul 06 16:17:29 doveadm: Error: Failed to iterate through some users The director has "iterate_query" set -- Tom

I am trying to compile the small Samba 3.0.2a source on Solaris 9 to use ldap. The ./configure run reports: "WARNING: libldap is needed for LDAP support". The Solaris installation has it's native libldap installed in /usr/lib, but the configuration does not seem to find it. Would anyone know what I am missing? Thanks...dlb David Bost Dow Jones and Co. 4300 North Route 1 South

Hi there, I seem to be misunderstanding routes a little bit as I can''t get the behavior I''m expecting from the following. My goal is to get "/forums/1" from the code <%= url_for :id => forum.id %> which is being called from a view associated with a controller named "Forums" and the "index" action. I have the following routes:

Either I''m not understanding how things are used, or this might be a bug in ActiveRecord. I''m using version 1.13.2. In my version of activerecord/lib/active_record/validations.rb (the svn trunk version is browsable at http://dev.rubyonrails.org/browser/trunk/activerecord/lib/active_record/validations.rb ), I have: def update_attribute_with_validation_skipping(name,

Can someone clear something up for me? [[[ # For apache to read user files, the ruleadd must give # it permissions by default. #### ${CMD} add subject uid 80 object not uid 80 mode rxws; ${CMD} add subject gid 80 object not gid 80 mode rxws; ]]] Doesn't the above mean that an apache user (eg, user-supplied CGI process, PHP script, etc) has the ability to read (and write!) anything in the

Hi, I''ve been experimenting with ip route for the last few days to get load sharing accross 2 providers working. While it works most of the time, on a few occasions, packets are routed to the wrong interface. I''m not sure to understand rules and routes traversal correctly (I couldn''t find answers in the howto). So, here are my questions: 1. How does the rule

Hi, I''ve been playing with Arel for a few days, but I feel really confused about predicates / arrays intersection. Let''s say I have 3 models: users, (bank) accounts and transfers. An account belongs to a user, and a transfer is made of a source and target accounts (see the snippets below). Given a user, I want to query his transfers. I can go this way in the User class: def

I suspect I might be grossly misunderstanding kerberos and AD here, but I cant seem to grok the following. net ads join integrates my linux samba server (named foundry) into an AD domain and all works fine. The samba server is using the kerberos keytab. root@foundry:~ # kinit -k -t /etc/krb5.keytab foundry$ root@foundry:~ # kinit -k -t /etc/krb5.keytab host/foundry.example.local kinit(v5):

syslinux 6.01, on XP cmd prompt: With syslinux.exe --update c: At least one specified option not yet implemented for this installer. it is clear which option is not yet implemented. However, before trying just --update, I did try: syslinux.exe --active --directory /downloadedPrograms/syslinux \ --update --mbr c: (line was edited for presentation purposes) and got

On Sunday 21 September 2008 20:45:37 Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > I was re-reading the specification for extractelement and friends, and I > notice that the index is restricted to i32. Since vectors might clearly > have a larger number of elements on 64-bit platforms, I wonder if I am > misunderstanding the intended use of these instructions. The code generator cannot handle vectors

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:42 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > On Sunday 21 September 2008 20:45:37 Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > I was re-reading the specification for extractelement and friends, and I > > notice that the index is restricted to i32. Since vectors might clearly > > have a larger number of elements on 64-bit platforms, I wonder if I am > > misunderstanding the

> > The code generator cannot handle vectors with more than 16383 (?) > > elements. Even so, I'm not sure it makes much sense to use vectors > > with more than a handful of elements. > > I understood Chris to say that these instructions were for SIMD > machines, and if the limit you mention applies to SIMD I'm not worried. > Does that limit also apply to

On 12/27/2019 2:24 PM, Jonathan H wrote: > <Local/1000 at default-0000001f;2>AGI Rx << SET VARIABLE myVar "Hello > World!!!" > <Local/1000 at default-0000001f;2>AGI Tx >> 200 result=1 > <Local/1000 at default-0000001f;2>AGI Rx << GET FULL VARIABLE myVar > <Local/1000 at default-0000001f;2>AGI Tx >> 200 result=1 (myVar) >

OK, that works - looks like a documentation bug? (Also very confusing!) Should I report it on the page at https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+17+AGICommand_get+full+variable or on the main tracker? Many thanks - couldn't figure out what was wrong! On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 19:36, Sean Bright <sean.bright at gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/27/2019 2:24 PM, Jonathan H wrote:

Hello! Could someone, please, explain to me the meaning of Subnet directive in configuration file of host, because I really don't understand this. http://www.tinc-vpn.org/documentation/tinc_4.html#Configuration "The subnet which this tinc daemon will serve."??? I assign an IP from apropriate subnet to interface, what does it mean "will serve"? I've read