similar to: GMM estimation

Hello, although I searched for a solution related to my problem I didn?t find one, yet. My skills in R aren?t very large, however. For my Diploma thesis I need to run a GMM estimation on a dynamic panel model using the "pgmm" - function in the plm-Package. The model I want to estimate is: "Y(t) = Y(t-1) + X1(t) + X2(t) + X3(t)" . There are no "normal" instruments

Hello -- The question I have is about the gmm() function from the 'gmm' package (v. 1.4-5). The manual accompanying the package says that the gmm() function is programmed to use either of four numerical solvers -- optim, optimize, constrOptim, or nlminb -- for the minimization of the GMM objective function. I wonder whether there is a way to pass controls to a solver used while calling

Hi everyone, I am using the gmm function from the gmm package and encountered an unexpected error. No model can be estimated if I load formula.tools?I need to restart R each time. Here is a simple reproducible example: *library(gmm)data(Finance)r <- Finance[1:300, 1:10]rm <- Finance[1:300, "rm"]rf <- Finance[1:300, "rf"]z <- as.matrix(r-rf)zm

Hi Aristide and welcome to R-help! Your message was a bit mangled [*]. It's best to compose messages to this mailing list in plain text. Otherwise (when composed in HTML), the mailing list eats the HTML part and we're left with the plain text part automatically generated by your mailer, which isn't always readable. ? Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:45:29 +0100 Elys?e Aristide <ariel92and at

Dear, I built the generalized method of moments model to estimate the sales rank in the bookstore using plm package in R. The equation is: data1.gmm <- pgmm(dynformula(lnsales_rank ~ ln_price + avg_ham_rate + avg_spam_rate + num_of_ham+ num_of_spam + ship_code2 +ship_code3 +ship_code4+ ship_code5+ ship_code6 + ship_ code7, lag = list(0, 0, 0, 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), log =FALSE), data=data,

A copy of this question can be found on Cross Validated: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/645362 I am estimating a system of seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR) in R. Each of the equations has one unique regressor and one common regressor. I am using `gmm::sysGmm` and am experimenting with different weighting matrices. I get the same results (point estimates, standard errors and

Generally speaking, this sort of detailed statistical question about a speccial package in R does not get a reply on this general R programming help list. Instead, I suggest you either email the maintainer (found by ?maintainer) or ask a question on a relevant R task view, such as https://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Econometrics.html . (or any other that you judge to be more appropriate).

Inthe code below I was trying to to obtain the GMM estimates for CAPM (REGRESSION) for 36 stocks each have 180 observations,however it only gives me one output rather than 36. In SAS i would just put in a *By statement*. I have a variable TICKER that categorize them into 36 groups. *How can I obtain all 36 output instead of just one.* **

Dear everyone: I have to finish my thesis to graduate as Bs. in Economics. I choose to estimate a New Keynesian Phillips Curve (NKPC) for Uruguay using Generalized Moment Method (GMM). I do not know programming or R but I would like to use it. Should I use gee, geepack or gam? Thanks in advance, Sebasti?n. *************************************** ?Hola todos! Para terminiar mi

I have a relatively simple finance application of GMM. Given the moment condition: E[m*R]=0 where m=m[theta] I would like to constrain m>0. Any ideas? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I am trying to generate a set of data points from a Gaussian mixture model. My mixture model is represented by a data frame that looks like this: > gmm weight mean sd 1 0.3 0 1.0 2 0.2 -2 0.5 3 0.4 4 0.7 4 0.1 5 0.3 I have written the following function that generates the appropriate data: gmm_data <- function(n, gmm) { c(rnorm(n*gmm[1,]$weight, gmm[1,]$mean,

Hi Ivan, Thank you for your message. Does that mean that I should send a new message? Or is it okay for this time? Best, Aristide On Fri, Nov 1, 2024, 22:29 Ivan Krylov <ikrylov at disroot.org> wrote: > Hi Aristide and welcome to R-help! > > Your message was a bit mangled [*]. It's best to compose messages to > this mailing list in plain text. Otherwise (when composed in

Hi, I'm trying to use gmm package in order to calculate linear regression (I need to use the gmm for other application and this is a prior test I'm doing). I've defined a function for linear regression with 2 variables (x[,1] holds the y values, while x[,2:3] holds the x values): function(tet, x) { m1 <- (x[,1] - (tet[1] + tet[2] * x[,2] + tet[3] * x[,3])) * x[,2] m2 <-

A copy of this question can be found on Cross Validated: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/645610 I am estimating a system of seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR) with `gmm::sysGmm` in R. Each of the equations has one unique regressor and one common regressor. The common regressor is a dummy variable indicating the last observation (n-1 zeros followed by 1). I impose a restriction that

hello I have covariance stacionary proces, and i want to estimate some parameter of this proces via gmm. My problem is with write "g" -function. 0 order autocovariance is not problem 1 and higher order autocavariance are problem, because add order from 0 mean that I "loose" one "observacion" if I have 100 observation and i am going to use mean, variance and first

Dear R Experts--- Sorry for all the questions yesterday and today. I am trying to use Yves Croissant's pgmm function in the plm package with Blundell-Bond moments. I have read the Blundell-Bond paper, and want to run the simplest model first, d[i,t] = a*d[i,t-1] + fixed[i] + u[i,t] . no third conditioning variables yet. the full set of moment conditions recommended for system-GMM,

Hi All, I'm trying to estimate some parameters in my model via GMM using the function gmm(), but I keep getting the message "The covariance matrix of the coefficients is singular". I've changed the moment conditions and the initial value of the parameters, and I still get this message. Are the results valid after receiving this message? Any ideas on how to get rid of it?

? Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:53:52 +0100 Elys?e Aristide <ariel92and at gmail.com> ?????: > Does that mean that I should send a new message? Or is it okay for > this time? No need to post it again. Did it help to replace the as.character() method for formulas provided by 'formula.tools'? I see the problem is already reported to the 'formula.tools' maintainer [*], so there

Hi! I am looking for some insight with this situation: what to do or how to analyze when our models fitted with pgmm never pass Sargant test? With my current dataset, I've been fitting different models and with all possible combinations of lagged instruments, with all possible lag order combinations, but no model passes Sargan test. I can not give up gmm here as I have autocorrelation and

Hello, I have a set of 100 variables with 1560 observations. I did an O.L.S regression of three of these variables on a fourth. But there are problems of endogeneity... So I look in my dataset for instruments to do an IV. I can't find a good instrument because their correlation with my endogeneous variables are too low. But I see that when I create a combined variable composed of 12 variables