similar to: scheirer-ray-hare extention

Does anyone know if a module already exists to run the Scheirer-Ray-Hare extension to Kruskal-Wallis in R, in order to run a non-parametric equivalent to a two-way ANOVA? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/using-Scheirer-Ray-Hare-in-R-tp3594480p3594480.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello to all the people in the forum, I'm trying to perform a Scheirer-Ray-Hare test in R, and despite I've found some posts talking about this test, there no one in which I can found how to do so. Can anyone explain me how to do the test? Thanks Pablo -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Scheirer-Ray-Hare-tp3818476p3818476.html Sent from the R help mailing

Hi, I was wondering if it was possible to do the "Scheirer-Ray-Hare" extension of the Kruskal-Wallis test using R, or if it was possible to use some other non-parametric test for the following situation: I have continuous data that is grouped by 2 factor variables. I would like a non-parametric test because the group variances are not equal. I would like to look for the effects of

Estimados usuaRios: deseo hacer una consulta, debo realizar una prueba no paramétrica a un conjunto de datos que posee una variable de respuesta con tres factores que poseen interacción, o al menos debo probar ello. Es decir, realizar una prueba Scheirer-Ray-Hare o de Contrastes de rangos alineados. Estuve trabajando el paquete ARTool aunque no me queda claro

Hi, Please dput() your example dataset. dat1<- read.table(text="a?? a?? a?? a??? a??? b?? b??? b??? c??? c?? c??? c 2? 4??? 5?? 2??? 7??? 2?? 2??? 6??? 3??? 7?? 9??? 3 3? 3?? 4?? 1???? 6??? 8?? 1??? 3??? 5??? 2??? 6??? 3",sep="",header=FALSE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) library(reshape) ?dat2<-melt(as.data.frame(t(dat1)),id.var="V1")[,-2]

Recently, I ran a series of Kruskal-Wallace tests [kruskal.test()] using by() to group by site Output is a list: >Herb.KW Herb.df$ID: 10-1 Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test data: Indicator_Rating by Year Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 15.24, df = 7, p-value = 0.03302 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Herb.df$ID: 18-1

Hi, I am trying to do a kruskal wallis test on two lists, fVisited and cSN: fVisited[[1]] [1] 0.17097623 0.30376141 0.17577266 0.14951855 0.03959753 0.08096217 0.05744888 0.02196257.... .... cSN[[1]] [1] 0.08557303 0.36477791 0.19601252 0.12981040 0.05351320 0.10385542 0.03539577 0.03106175.... So if I just want to do a test on just one of the entries this is simple enough:

Hi everyone, I am working on analyzing spectra which requires hundreds of kruskal wallis tests to be performed. Once significant results are found post tests are performed ect. My questions are: how do I perform all these kw tests and save just the pvalues in a table? Is there anyway to have R automatically perform post tests if a result of p<0.05 is found? Currently when I run the test

I am interested in using "multcompLetters" after running "kruskalmc" but I'm a newbie and I'm not having luck figuring it out. I can run "kruskalmc" just fine, but after studying the documentation for "multcompletters" for a long time, I cannot figure out how to make it work. Any ideas? R input is below > >> #here is my data set >>

I've tried without success to calculate interaction and main effects contrasts using R. I've found the functions C(), contrasts(), se.contrasts() and fit.contrasts() in package gmodels. Given the url for a small dataset and the two-way anova model below, I'd like to reproduce the results from appended SAS code. Thanks. --Dale. ## the dataset (from Montgomery) twoway <-

Hi, ?kruskal.test() ?a<- c(2,4,5,2,7) ?b<- c(2,2,6) ?c<- c(3,7,9,3) ?kruskal.test(list(a,b,c)) # ?#? Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test # #data:? list(a, b, c) #Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 2.003, df = 2, p-value = 0.3673 A.K. Hi I need an expression in R to apply a kruskal.test to this data (for example). a ? a ? a ? a ? ?a ? ?b ? b ? ?b ? ?c ? ?c ? c ? ?c 2 ?4 ? ?5 ? 2 ? ?7 ? ?2 ? 2 ?

We need a two-way non-parametric ANOVA in order to analysis properly some ecological data, do you know any reference in R? or how to do it? Thank you very much All the best diana -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Two-way-non-parametric-ANOVA--tp15039308p15039308.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi all, The Kruskal-Wallis test is a generalization of the two-sample Mann-Whitney test to *k* samples. That being the case, the Kruskal-Wallis test with *k*=2 should give an identical p-value to the Mann-Whitney test, should it not? x1<-c(1:5) x2<-c(6,8,9,11) a<-wilcox.test(x1,x2,paired=FALSE) b<-kruskal.test(list(x1,x2),paired=FALSE) a$p.value [1] 0.01587302 b$p.value [1]

I have run a kruskal.test() using the by() function, which returns a list of results like the following (subset of results): Herb.df$ID: 4-2 Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 18.93, df = 7, p-value = 0.00841 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Herb.df$ID: 44-1 Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 4.43, df = 6, p-value = 0.6187 So then, how do extract a vector

Hi, I have searched and found a response to a question similar to mine but when I tried the code, R says it's not an actual function so I thought I'd ask here. http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4633035/Cookies.csv Cookies.csv I have attached the data I am using. I am trying to look at two things: how moisture content changes over time, and how it changes along the length of a log

Hi there, I am doing multiple comparisons for data that is not normally distributed. For this purpose I tried both functions kruskal{agricolae} and kruskalmc{pgirmess}. It confuses me that these functions do not yield the same results although they are doing the same thing, don't they? Can anyone tell my why this happens and which function I can trust? kruskalmc() tells me that there are no

Hello, I need nemenyi-test or any other post-hoc test for kruskal-wallis, but I just can't find out how to implement this in R. My data set is nitrite concentrations in four different groups which I intend to compare. The kruskal-wallis-test showed significance, but I still don't know between which groups these significances are. Can anybody help me with this? Thanks

Dear Sweave and R aficionados, I am using R and Latex for many years, writing texts in greek. I tried to combine them with Sweave, but without any success. Could you provide me with any help? Usually my LaTeX files are like this iso-8859-7 encoded .tex file: http://costis.name/0various/lists/R/sweave/successful.greek.tex , which happily produces

Dear Researchers, Sorry for this email but I am not a statistician, and for this I have this problem to understand. Thanks in Advance for help and suggestions. Gianni I have 21 classes (00, 01, 02, 04, ....,020) with different length. I did a kruskal wall test in R with the following code kruskal.test(m.class.l, m.class.length.lf) Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test data: m.class.l and

I followed the threads that enquired about doing post-hoc tests after doing Kruskal testing. It took me to npmc. But npmc is giving an output I do not understand. I noticed a thread entitled "npmc function: 'x' must be atomic" but there never appeared to be a resolution. > npmc(npmcinput) Error in sort(unique.default(x), na.last = TRUE) : 'x' must be atomic