similar to: R package to solve the following maximization problem

Hello everyone I am trying to get one of my packages through R's QC. The package is clean for me under R-2.4.1, R-2.5.0, and R-devel, but Kurt gets > > * checking R code for possible problems ... WARNING > hypercube: no visible binding for global variable ?f? Function hypercube() [cut-&-pasted below] is intended to return an adjacency matrix for an n-dimensional

Dear all, Does anybody have an idea or suggestion how to construct (plot) 4-dimensional hypercube in R. Thanks in advance for any pointers. Regards, Andrej

Hello, I am performing a sensitivity analysis using a Latin Hypercube sampling. However, I have difficulty to draw a Hypercube sample for one variable. I?ve generated this variable from a Poisson distribution as follows: set.seed(5) mortality_probability <- round(ppois(seq(0, 7, by = 1), lambda = 0.9), 2) barplot(mortality_probability, names.arg = seq(0, 7, by = 1), xlab = "Age

Hi all, I am a begginer in R and I have been trying to use the Conditioned Latin Hypercube to choose sample points only in areas close to roads due to the difficult thorough access in the study area. I could use a code to create the points throughout the area, but I need to create a code to make the R only comes up with points close to this road. I've been using the packages

Thank you very much Rob for your answer. I have some difficulties to understand how to apply my agent-based model to each parameter combination generated by the LHS, in particular when parameters are defined by probability distributions. Indeed, I have multiple parameters in my model: parameters which are defined by a single value (like ?temperature", "pressure?) and parameters which are

>May 26, 2017; 11:41am Nelly Reduan Latin Hypercube Sampling when parameters are >defined according to specific probability distributions >Hello, > I would like to perform a sensitivity analysis using a Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS). >Among the input parameters in the model, I have a parameter dispersal distance which is defined according to an exponential probability

Hello, I got one question on the Latin hypercube sampling. suppose there are three variables a, b, c, all of them follow the normal distribution. the mean value and standard deviation for each are  a(32, 2), b(35,5), c(37,3). I would like to use Latin hypercube sampling to random generate 1000 samples. but it needs to satisfy the condition that a<b<c. How can I implement this

Hello all, I am trying to do a Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) to a 5-parameter design matrix. I start as follows: library(lhs) p1<-randomLHS(1000, 5) If I check the distribution of each parameter (column), they are perfectly uniformly distributed (as expected).For example, hist(p1[,1]) Now the hard (maybe strange) question. I want the combination of the first three parameters to sum up to

Dear All, I am trying to solve the following maximization problem with R: find x(t) (continuous) that maximizes the integral of x(t) with t from 0 to 1, subject to the constraints dx/dt = u, |u| <= 1, x(0) = x(1) = 0. The analytical solution can be obtained easily, but I am trying to understand whether R is able to solve numerically problems like this one. I have tried to find an

Hi all, I am attempting to use latin hypercube sampling to sample different variable functions in a series of simultaneous differential equations. There is very little code online about lhs or clhs, so from different other help threads I have seen, it seems I need to create a probability density function for each variable function, and then use latin hypercube sampling on this pdf. So far, I

Thanks for your answer. However, my variable is simulated from the cumulative distribution function of the Poisson distribution. So, the pattern obtained from the function "qpois" is not the same as the observed pattern (i.e., obtained from the function "ppois") set.seed(5) mortality_probability <- round(ppois(seq(0, 7, by = 1), lambda = 0.9), 2)

Hi I want to du a sensitivity analysis using Latin Hypercubes. But my parameters have to fulfill two conditions: 1) ranging from 0 to 1 2) have to sum up to 1 So far I am using the lhs package and am doing the following: library(lhs) ws <- improvedLHS(1000, 7) wsSums <- rowSums(ws) wss <- ws / wsSums but I think I can't do that, as after the normalization > min(wss) [1]

> How can I draw a Hypercube sample for the variable mortality_probability so > that this variable exhibits the same pattern as the observed distribution? One simple way is to use the uniform random output of randomLHS as input to the quantile function for your desired distribution(s). For example: q <- randomLHS(1000, 3) colnames(q) <- c("A", "B",

Hi everybody, I'm trying to create a numerical data frame on which to perform PRCC. So far I have created a data frame that consists of function/vector output that displays in numerical form, but when I try and run PRCC (from epiR package) I get the following error message: "Error in solve.default(C) : Lapack routine dgesv: system is exactly singular" It appears this is because

Thanks for your answer. I have attached the plot for representing the variable. I think that I need to draw a Hypercube sample for each age class (i.e., for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) in a given simulation (i.e., N = 1) and the LHS values for all age classes should be like the observed cumulative distribution (see attached figure). Thus, the output of randomLHS should be a matrix with 100 rows (N =

Hi, I'd like to use Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHC) in the the context of uncertainty / sensitivity analysis of a complex model with approximately 10 input variables. With the LHC approach I'd like to generate parameter combinations for my model input variables. Therefore I came across an simple example here on the mailing list (

Hi Guys, it would be great if you could help me with a MLE problem in R. I am trying to evaluate the maximum likelihood estimates of theta = (a1, b1, a2, b2, P) which defines a mixture of a Poisson distribution and two gamma prior distributions (where the Poisson means have a gamma distribution, actually 2 gammas and P is the mixing factor). The likelihood function for theta is L(theta) = Pi,j{P

Hello: I have been trying to program the following maximization problem and would definitely welcome some help. the target function: sum_{i} f(alpha, beta'X_{i}), where alpha and beta are unknown d-dim parameter, f is a known function an X_{i} are i.i.d. r.v. I need to maximize the above sum, under the constaint that:

Dear R users, I?m a graduate students and in my master thesis I must obtain the values of the parameters x_i which maximize this Multinomial log?likelihood function log(n!)-sum_{i=1]^4 log(n_i!)+sum_ {i=1}^4 n_i log(x_i) under the following constraints: a) sum_i x_i=1, x_i>=0, b) x_1<=x_2+x_3+x_4 c)x_2<=x_3+x_4 I have been using the ?ConstrOptim? R-function with the instructions

Hello R Users, I am doing a Latin Hypercube type simulation. I have found the improvedLHS function and have used it to generate a bunch of properly distributed uniform probabilities. Now I am using functions like qlnorm to transform that into the appropriately lognormal or triangularly distributed parameters for my modes. However I have a parameter which I believe is bimodally distributed,