similar to: error using Match package

Hi. I am using the Matching package for propensity score matching. For each treated unit, I want to find all control units whose propensity scores lie within a certain distance from the treated unit. The sample code is as follows: > library(Matching) > x <- rnorm(100000) > y <- rnorm(100000) > z <- rbinom(100000,1,0.002) > logit.reg <-

Hi Everyone, I am very new to R. When i run the code yesterday, it was working fine. I was able to find gene annotation. somehow, today, when i try to run it again, it is giving me errors message that i don't understand. It says that it cannot open file. what file is it looking for? ###################################################### ##make sure to install and load annotationtool in R

"Matching" version 0.48 is now available on CRAN. Matching provides functions for estimating causal effects by multivariate and propensity score matching. The package includes a variety of univariate and multivariate tests to determine if balance has been obtained by the matching procedure. These tests can also be used to determine if an experiment or quasi-experiment is balanced on

"Matching" version 0.48 is now available on CRAN. Matching provides functions for estimating causal effects by multivariate and propensity score matching. The package includes a variety of univariate and multivariate tests to determine if balance has been obtained by the matching procedure. These tests can also be used to determine if an experiment or quasi-experiment is balanced on

Hi all, i am looking to built a simple example of a very basic propensity score adjustment, just using the estimated propensity scores as inverse probability weights (respectively 1-estimated weights for the non-treated). As far as i understood, MLE predictions of a logit model can directly be used as to estimates of the propensity score. I already considered the twang package and the

Hello! If I understand this listserve correctly, I can email this address to get help when I am struggling with code. If this is inaccurate, please let me know, and I will unsubscribe. I have been struggling with the same error message for a while, and I can't seem to get past it. Here is the issue: I am using a data set that uses -1:-9 to indicate various kinds of missing data. I changed

Dear All, My question is more a statistical question than a R question. The reason I am posting here is that there are lots of excellent statistician on this list, who can always give me good advices. Per my understanding, the purpose of propensity score is to reduce the bias while estimating the treatment effect and its implementation is a 2-stage model. 1) First of all, if we assume that T =

There may be benefits to having a machine learning method that explicitly targets covariate balance. We have experimented with optimizing the weights directly to obtain the best covariate balance, but got some strange solutions for simple cases that made us wary of such methods. Machine learning methods that yield calibrated probability estimates should do well (e.g. those that optimize the

look at dev.new() to specify plot window size and then ?layout to specify number and size of each plot in the window Jiaqi.Zhang wrote > Hi, all, > > I am working on the following code to learn how to plot graphs together. I > used the par(mfrow=c(1,3)) function to try to put all three plot() graphs > together. But it always fail without any error message? Can anybody help

Dear everyone, I am trying to run rgenoud on several chips simultaneusly. I used the instructions provided on Jasjeet Sekhon's Homepage (http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/rgenoud/multiple_cpus.html). However, I have the newer version of R (R 2.12) installed - for a 64-bit machine. So, when I tried to install the special version of "snow" from a zip file provided by Jasjeet on his page, R

Dear R-list, i have 6 different sets of samples. Each sample has about 5000 observations, with each observation comprised of 150 baseline covariates (X), 125 of which are dichotomous. Roughly 20% of the observations in each sample are "treatment" and the rest are "control" units. i am doing propensity score matching, i have already estimated propensity scores(predicted

I'm using the "Match" package to do propensity score matching. Here's some example code that shows the problem that I'm having (much of this code is taken from the Match package documentation): *data(lalonde) glm1 <- glm(treat~age + I(age^2) + educ + I(educ^2) + black + hisp + married + nodegr + re74 + I(re74^2) + re75 + I(re75^2) + u74 + u75,

Dear R users, This is to announce new versions of our packages granova and PSAgraphics, both now v.1.2. granova derives from ?graphical analysis of variance.? The package consists of four functions that facilitate seeing basic data as well as standard summary statistics for various ANOVA applications. The functions are especially flexible, so they are able to handle widely different data

Dear R users, This is to announce new versions of our packages granova and PSAgraphics, both now v.1.2. granova derives from ?graphical analysis of variance.? The package consists of four functions that facilitate seeing basic data as well as standard summary statistics for various ANOVA applications. The functions are especially flexible, so they are able to handle widely different data

I have to the treatment effect base on the observational data.And the treatment variable is multinomial rather than binary.Because the treatment assignment is not random,so the selection-bias exists.Under this condition,what's the best way to estimate the treatment effect? I know that if the treatment is binary,I can use propensity score matching using MatchIt package.But what about

Dear All, I would like to find something ( references, code,..) to implement a comparison of three treatments in an observational study using the 'Propensity Score'. Any help is much appreciated. Thanks! Giovanni -- dr. Giovanni Parrinello Department of Biotecnologies Medical Statistics Unit University of Brescia Viale Europa, 11 25123 Brescia email: parrinel at med.unibs.it Phone:

Dear list, I am trying to set up a propensity-weighted regression using the survey package. Most of my population is sampled with a sampling probability of one (that is, I have the full population). However, for a subset of the data I have only a 50% sample of the full population. In previous work on the data, I analyzed these data using SAS and STATA. In those packages I used a propensity weight

The Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups (twang 1.0) has been released to CRAN. The package collects functions useful for computing propensity score weights for treatment effect estimation, developing nonresponse weights, and diagnosing the quality of those weights. The package includes a vignette containing some basic theory and walks through two examples. It is available by

Dear List, I am having difficulty running the ps() function when variables are stored as factors and was hoping someone could provide some advice on how to proceed. I am running propensity score matching as outlined in: Greg Ridgeway, Dan McCarey, Andrew Morral, Lane Burgette and Beth Ann Grin (May 3, 2013) Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups: A tutorial for the twang

Hi all, i am wondering if there?s any other method to adjust for selection related bias of estimates except propensity scoring and heckit / mills ratio approach? i also read documentation of Match and twang package so far, so i don?t speak of any ATE / ATT related methods, respectively any methods that match or stratify... Is there something else ? thx in advance