similar to: pwr package

Hi all, I love syslinux!! It works great. Problem. GHost 8.x and higher... With ghost 7.5 and earlier I was able to boot floppy images from my tftp server. But as you all know Ghost 8.x and higher had a bloated ghost.exe that does not fit on a single 1.44mb floopy image file. Has any one had any luck in getting ghost 8.x and higher to work with syslinux and memdisk? I have tried to create over

Hello, We are creating a web-based conferencing application using Asterisk as the voice conferencing server. This as an open source project. We are trying to determine if there is interest of the community and perhaps work together to improve the application. Using the web application, you can upload your powerpoint presentation, manage the participants in the conference thru the web interface

Hi all, I'm having trouble getting access to the pwr. This is on Ubuntu Lucid Lynx, 64 bit. I'm installing pwr via packages.install('pwr'), and loading it via library(pwr), both of which appear successful. Strangely, I never get access to the pwr object in R. I tried installing it to /usr/local/lib/R/site-library and ~/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library. I also tried installing it

On 12/22/2014 05:11 PM, Vince Hsu wrote: > The platform device does not use the common nouveau_pwr_init() to initialize > the PWR, but it does need the .prob() be assigned to avoid NULL pointer > dereference in graph/nve4.c. s/prob/pgob/ :-( Will fix in next version. > > Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> > --- > > v2: this patch is added since v2. (v1

This patch fixes the pwr firmware to play nicely at least on NVA3. Because Martin might send more patches soon, I didn't include a regenerated nvXX.fuc.h. To me it makes more sense if all patches are merged then, and a final patch regenerates the headers in one go. Of course, I did test this patch and found it to work as intended, so feel free to pick up as you please.

Hi, I am trying to do a power calculation for a difference in proportions test where I want to estimate the sample size required. I know (well estimate) that group one (n1) is 10% of the population and group 2 (n2) is 90% of the population. I know the effect size (h). pwr.2p2n.test only allows one variable to be left null whereas I would like both n1 and n2 to be determined where I know there

Dear R experts, I have conducted a power calculation in order to estimate the number of subjects needed to detect an effect size of d=0.28 (cohen's d) for a difference between two independent groups (alpha level should be 0.05 and the effect should be detected with 80% probability). The results from the code below indicates that I would need n=400 subjects (200 in each group). This is seems

Hi, I am trying to sort out a discrepancy between power calculations results between me and another statistician. I use R but I am not sure what she uses. It is on the proportions test and so I have been using pwr.prop.test. I think I have tracked the problem down to pwr.prop.test not using the continuity correction for the test (I did this by using the java applet from

The platform device does not use the common nouveau_pwr_init() to initialize the PWR, but it does need the .prob() be assigned to avoid NULL pointer dereference in graph/nve4.c. Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> --- v2: this patch is added since v2. (v1 is the RFC actually) nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c | 2 +- nvkm/subdev/pwr/priv.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> wrote: > > On 12/22/2014 05:11 PM, Vince Hsu wrote: >> >> The platform device does not use the common nouveau_pwr_init() to >> initialize >> the PWR, but it does need the .prob() be assigned to avoid NULL pointer >> dereference in graph/nve4.c. > > s/prob/pgob/ :-( > Will fix in

From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> --- nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/kernel.fuc | 13 +++++++++++++ nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/nv108.fuc.h | 25 +++++++++++-------------- nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/nva3.fuc.h | 23 ++++++++++------------- nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/nvc0.fuc.h | 23 ++++++++++------------- nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/nvd0.fuc.h | 23 ++++++++++------------- 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 53

Needs to be done after wait-for-VBLANK, and NVA3 requires register writes in between. Rather than hard-coding register writes, just split out fb_disable and fb_enable. Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/pwr.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h | 14 ++++++++++++++

On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> wrote: > This patch fixes the pwr firmware to play nicely at least on NVA3. Because Martin might send more patches soon, I didn't include a regenerated nvXX.fuc.h. To me it makes more sense if all patches are merged then, and a final patch regenerates the headers in one go. Of course, I did test this patch and found it

Add TSC stop support for Deep C state TSC may stop at deep C state (C3/C4...) entry/exit. this patch add the logic that save and restore TSC during deep C state entry/exit, by using platform timer (PIT/HPET) signed-off-by: Yu Ke <ke.yu@intel.com> signed-off-by: Tian Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com> signed-off-by: Wei Gang<gang.wei@intel.com>

From: Karol Herbst <git at karolherbst.de> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/macros.fuc | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/macros.fuc b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/macros.fuc index c5ec61f..86b8fd4 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/macros.fuc +++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/macros.fuc @@ -66,6

Dear R Users Does some has any idea about how to execute a scilab file(.sce file) from the Terminal in R. Any kind of guidance would be highly welcomed and appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Execution-of-a-.sce-file-through-R-tp21227441p21227441.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello All, This might seem elementary to everyone, but please bear with me. I've just spent some time fitting poly functions to time series data in R using lm() and predict(). I want to analyze the functions once I've fit them to the various data I'm studying. However, after pulling the first function into Octave (just by plotting the polynomial function using fplot() over

Hi, I would like to use a weighted lm model to reduce heteroscendasticity. I am wondering if the only way to generate the weights in R is through the laborious process of trial and error by hand. Does anyone know if R has a function that would automatically generate the weights need for lm? Thanks, -- Tom [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I try to fit a non linear regression by minimising the sum of the sum of squares. The model is number[2]-(x/number[1])^number[3] Number [2] and number [1] change as the data changes but for all the set of data number[3] must be identical. I have 3 set of data (x1,y1), (x2,y2), (x3,y3). x_a<-c(0,0.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,6) y_a<-c(5.4,5,4.84,4.3,4,2,1.56,1.3)

How can I print the definition of a function that is in the base package? for example, if I type: which.min I get function (x) .Internal(which.min(x)) <environment: namespace:base> How can I see the definition of this function? Thanks.