similar to: non parametric linear regression

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "non parametric linear regression"

2006 Apr 07
1
fuzzy classification and dissimilarity matrix
Hello, I want to make a fuzzy classification from a dissimilarity matrix (calculated with daisy from package 'cluster'). I have tried to use fanny (package cluster) but I have the same problems than described in a previous message (http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/05/05/4546.html) i.e. it always gives me two clusters in the results (even if k is different from 2) with the same
2006 Mar 20
1
type in daisy
Hi, I'm a PhD student and I want to use the function 'daisy' from the package 'cluster' to compute dissimilarities. My variables are of mixed types so I use the argument 'stand' in daisy to define the type of my variables. I have the following error message : Warning message: binary variable(s) 13, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35,
2006 May 05
1
MRPP in R
Hello, I'm looking for a R function proceeding MRPP (Multi-Response Permutation Procedures). Is it available? Thanking you in anticipation, Jeanne Vallet, PhD student [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Jan 12
2
Magnitude of trend in time series
Hello, I am analyzing some climate time series data using the Mann Kendall package and was wondering if there was a way to calculate the trend using Sen's nonparametric estimator slope in R? Thank you in advance, Barry _________________________ Barry Baker, Ph.D. Global Climate Change Initiative The Nature Conservancy 2424 Spruce St., Suite 100 Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: (303)-541-0322 Fax:
2012 Oct 21
2
help speeding up simple Theil regression function
Hello, I am working on a simple non-parametric (Theil) regression function and and am following Hollander and Wolfe 1999 text. I would like some help making my function faster. I have compared with pre-packaged version from "MBLM", which isnt very fast either, but it appears mine is faster with N = 1000 (see results below). I plan on running this function repeatedly, and I generally
2002 Jun 24
3
Weird problem - one machine works another doesn't on new server - both OK on old one.
Hello and Thanks in Advance, I've been at this for three days now and can't think of anything else to try. Been through the docs and #samba on openprojects and even begged for direction in #samba-technical who suggested writing here. On the ancient RedHat 5.2 server (SAMBA 1.9?) both boxes work OK and continue to work OK with both servers now up (new one is from Mandrake 8.2 - SAMBA
2012 Mar 16
1
Change in behavior of update.views()?
I haven't seen this cryptic warning before: > update.views('Robust') Warning message: In update.views("Robust") : The following packages are not available: covRobust, distr, FRB, MASS, mblm, multinomRob, mvoutlier, quantreg, RandVar, rgam, RobAStBase, robfilter, RobLox, RobRex, robust, RobustAFT, robustbase, ROptEst, ROptRegTS, rrcov, sandwich, wle >
2006 Sep 13
2
kendall's w
Hi, I try to calculate Kendall's W coefficient and I have a bizarre error. little.app.mat<-matrix(c(1,3,4,2,6,5,2,4,3,1,5,6,3,2,5,1,5,4),nrow=3,byrow=TRUE) print(kendall.w(little.app.mat[-1,])) >>> Kendall's W for ordinal data >>> W = 0.7753623Error in if (is.na(x$p.table)) { : argument is of length zero
2006 Apr 24
1
rmeta: forest plot problem
Der useRs, I'm working on meta analysis using rmeta package. Using code below I plot the forest plot: library(rmeta) data (catheter) a<-meta.MH (n.trt, n.ctrl, col.trt, col.ctrl, data=catheter, names=Name, subset=c(13,6,5,3,7,12,4,11,1,8,10,2)) summary(a) # odds ratio values and confidence intervals metaplot(a$logOR, a$selogOR, nn=a$selogOR^-2,a$names, summn=a$logMH, sumse=a$selogMH,
2006 Feb 20
2
Status of Bugzilla #1153
Hi, I'd like to know if there is any chance to get bug 1153 fixed soon ? It seems like a trivial issue, a patch is provided, and it's a pain for us to manually patch every new release -- this was reported as a portable-specific bug, but also affects vanilla openssh. The bug is described at http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153 Simon -- Simon Vallet Ing?nieur
2009 Dec 13
2
O(N log N) Kendall Tau
I've noticed that the implementation of Kendall's Tau in R is O(N^2). The following reference describes how it can be done in O(N log N): A Computer Method for Calculating Kendall's Tau with Ungrouped Data William R. Knight Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 61, No. 314, Part 1 (Jun., 1966), pp. 436-439 http://www.jstor.org/pss/2282833 I'm interested in
2006 May 12
3
Maximum likelihood estimate of bivariate vonmises-weibulldistribution
Thanks Dimitris!!! That's much clearer now. Still have a lot of work to do this weekend to understand every bit but your code will prove very useful. Cheers, Aziz -----Original Message----- From: Dimitrios Rizopoulos [mailto:Dimitris.Rizopoulos at med.kuleuven.be] Sent: May 12, 2006 4:35 PM To: Chaouch, Aziz Subject: RE: [R] Maximum likelihood estimate of bivariate
2009 Jul 16
1
Theil test help
Hello, I have a series of questions that I hope will be simple to answer. Basically I would like a code to do the following so that I can compute the distribution free test for the slope of a postulated regression line (Theil test). As I am testing the null hypothesis that slope = 0 against the general alternative the slope does not equal 0, it should be pretty straight-forward. I have a data
2005 Jun 28
1
faster algorithm for Kendall's tau
Hi, I need to calculate Kendall's tau for large data vectors (length > 100'000). Is somebody aware of a faster algorithm or package function than "cor(, method="kendall")"? There are ties in the data to be considered (Kendall's tau-b). Any suggestions? Regards Ferdinand
2004 Oct 14
1
correlating between two vectors of numbers
Hi, R! Question1: I am trying to correlate two vectors of numbers (two columns of microarray signal values) by using the non-parametric Spearman's rank correlation coefficient rho: > cor.test(V2.Signal,V3.Signal,method="spearman") but I get the error message: Error in if (q > (n^3 - n)/6) pspearman(q - 1, n, lower.tail = FALSE) else pspearman(q, : missing value
2006 Sep 12
1
Kendall's tau-c
Hello, I can't find a package which calculates Kendall's tau-c. There is the package Kendall, but it only calcuates Kendall's tau-b. Here is the example from ttp://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/assocordinal.htm. cityriots <- data.frame(citysize=c(1,1,2,2,3,3), riotsize=c(1,2,1,2,1,2), weight=c(4,2,2,3,0,4)) cityriots <- data.frame(lapply(cityriots,function(x)
2006 Jun 22
2
programming advice
Dear R users I want to compute Kendall's Tau between two vectors x and y. But x and y may have zeros in the same position(s) and I wrote the following function to be sure to drop out those "double zeros" "cor.kendall" <- function(x,y) { nox <- c() noy <- c() # for (i in 1:length(x)) if (x[i]!= 0 | y[i] != 0) nox[length(nox)+1]<- x[i] for (i in
2005 Feb 12
3
7912G: Takes the same firmware as 7940/60?
Does anyone know if the 7912G (which the wiki says can do either sccp or sip) uses the 7940/60 sip firmware? I ask this because the only firmware I can seem to find on TAC for the 7912G is sccp, no sip...if it takes it's own firmware and doesn't use 7940/60 firmware, can someone point me to the right location for it? Thanks, Marty Mastera M3 Resources marty@m3resources.com Phone:
2010 Feb 08
2
Incorrect Kendall's tau for ordered variables (PR#14207)
Full_Name: Marek Ancukiewicz Version: 2.10.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (74.0.49.2) Both cor() and cor.test() incorrectly handle ordered variables with method="kendall", cor() incorrectly handles ordered variables for method="spearman" (method="person" always works correctly, while method="spearman" works for cor.test, but not for cor()). In
2011 Oct 04
3
inconsistent behavior of summary function
The summary function behaves inconsistently with data frame columns, e.g. summary(rock) #max of area 12212, correct summary(rock$area) #max of area 12210, incorrect max I know that summary(rock$area, digits=5) will correct the error (I DID read the manual). But my point is the inconsistency, because I get the correct answer without having to add the digits option in the first