similar to: fitted values in LMER for the fixed-effects only

Dear R help list, I have done a lot of searching but have not been able to find an answer to my problem. I apologize in advance if this has been asked before. I am applying a mixed model to my data using lmer. I will use sample data to illustrate my question: >library(lme4) >library(arm) >data("HR", package = "SASmixed") > str(HR) 'data.frame': 120 obs.

Dear all, I am running a mixed model using lmer. In order to obtain CI of individual coefficients I use mcmcsamp. However, I need advice which values that are most appropriate to present in result section of a paper. I have not used mixed models and lmer so much before so my question is probably very naive. However, to avoid to much problems with journal editors and referees addicted to

Dear all, I'm curious about how to interpret the results of the following code. The first model is directly from the help page of lmer; the second is the same model but using the Gamma family with log link. The fixed effects make sense, because y = 251.40510 + 10.46729 * Days is about the same as log(y) = 5.53613298 + 0.03502057 * Days but the random effects seem quite

Dear people of the help list I am drying to analyze my data using the 'lmer' function and I keep having problems. This is the model: > fm1<-lmer(dbh~spec+scheme+(1|Plot),data=d, REML=FALSE). I analyse tree size (dbh) of 3 different species (spec) and 3 planting schemes (scheme). I have 5 plots, which I hope to model as a random factor. (However, the subsequent output is based on

Hi all, To follow up on an older thread, it was suggested that the following would produce confidence intervals for the estimated BLUPs from a linear mixed effect model: OrthoFem<-Orthodont[Orthodont$Sex=="Female",] fm1OrthF. <- lmer(distance~age+(age|Subject), data=OrthoFem) fm1.s <- coef(fm1OrthF.)$Subject fm1.s.var <- fm1OrthF. at bVar$Subject fm1.s0.s <-

Hi all, I am having issues comparing models with lmer. As an example, when I run the code below the model summaries (AIC, BIC, loglik) differ between the summary() and anova() commands. Can anyone clear up what's wrong? Thank you! Darren Ward library(lme4) data(sleepstudy) fm1<-lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1|Subject), sleepstudy) summary(fm1) fm2<-lmer(Reaction ~ Days +

I am having a problem extracting from "mer" objects.    I have constructed my problem using existing datasets.   Using the following commands:   require(lme4) fm1 <- lmer(Yield ~ 1 + (1 | Batch), Dyestuff) fixef(fm1) I get the following error message: "Error in UseMethod("fixef") : no applicable method for "fixef""   I know that "fixef" is in

Hello, I am trying to do contrasts after applying a binomial mixed effect model with the function lmer. I have to extract the fix effect values, but as I write fixef(model), I get this error message: Error in UseMethod("fixef") : no method for 'fixef' with objects of class "mer" Has anybody some ideas why? And how can I then post-hoc testing my data if I cannot do

Paul: I may have found the issue (which is similar to your conclusion). I checked using egsingle in the mlmRev package as these individuals are strictly nested in this case: library(mlmRev) library(nlme) fm1 <- lme(math ~ year, random=~1|schoolid/childid, egsingle) fm2 <- lmer(math ~ year +(1|schoolid:childid) + (1|schoolid), egsingle) Checking the summary of both models, the output is

Thanks for telling me that you could not get my message, I hope this work better... so my question was: I built a population matrix to which I applied the fonction eigen in order to find the main parameters about my population. I know that the first eigen value correspond to lambda or exponential growth rate of my population. My problem is that I want to have the 95% confidence interval of the

I am having an issue with lmer that I wonder if someone could explain. I am trying to fit a mixed effects model to a set of longitudinal data over a set of individual subjects: (fm1 <- lmer(x ~ time + (time|ID),aa)) I quite often find that the correlation between the random effects is 1.0: Linear mixed model fit by REML Formula: x ~ time + (time | ID) Data: aa AIC BIC logLik deviance

Dear all, I want to estimate a crossed-random-effects model (i.e., measurements, students, schools) where students migrate between schools over time. I'm interested in the fixed effects of "SES", "age" and their interaction on "read" (reading achievement) while accounting for the sample design. Based on a previous post, I'm specifying my model as: fm1 <-

Dear R group, Tried to turn off the html in yahoo.  So far  not successful.  Apologies! I tried to get xyplot shrink fit for my mixed model.  But, the mixed model line is not seen in the graph. I would like to know if there is anything wrong with my code. Thanks, A.K. (fm1 <- lmer(Response3 ~1+ Wavelength*Start_Resp*time + (1|resid) + (1+time|Subject_BDat), family=binomial, data=Behavdat,

I want to compute confidence intervals for the random effect estimates for each subject. From checking on postings, this is what I cobbled together using Orthodont data.frame as an example. There was some discussion of how to properly access lmer slots and bVar, but I'm not sure I understood. Is the approach shown below correct? Rick B. # Orthodont is from nlme (can't have both nlme and

Hi, Thanks for your response, it nearly worked! But it only wrote one coloumn of data and not the three columns I need. Using fixef(m1) doesnt give the same results as coef(m1) when you are using more than one random effect. I need the coefficients for each individual so I use coef(m1) to get this which results in an object of class lmer.coef, 3 columns by 700 rows. as.data.frame() wont work on

Dear all, I'm trying to store/extract the mean& standard error of the fixed effects parameter and the variance of the random effects parameter from "lmer" procedure from mlmre4 package developed by bates n pinheiro. while storing fixed effects parameter is straight forward, the same is not true for storing the variance parameter of the random effects. kindly help me ~prabhu

Hello! If I run this example: library(nlme) fm1 <- lme(distance ~ age+Sex, Orthodont, random = ~ age + Sex| Subject) If I run: summary(fm1) then I can see the fixed effects for age and sex (17.7 for intercept, 0.66 for age, and -1.66 for SexFemale) If I run: ranef(fm1) Then it looks like it's producing the random effects for each subgroup (in this example - each subject). For example,

Dear all, I have three concerns: 1) I am running models with the lme4 package. I cannot find a way to pull out a vector of the fitted values and the residuals. Does anybody know how to do it? 2) How can I nest a random effect variable into a "two-level" fixed effect variable? 3) Suppose I have the following model: y = a + b|c + d + error, where 'a' is a fixed effect, 'c'

Dear All, I am working with linear mixed-effects models using the lme4 package in R. I created a model with the lmer function including some main effects, a two-way interaction and a random effect. Now I am searching how I could incorporate an interaction between the random effect and one of the fixed effects. I tried to express the interaction in:

Hello, R community, I have been using the lmer and mcmcsamp functions in R with some difficulty. I do not believe this is my code or data, however, because my attempts to use the sample code and 'sleepstudy' data provided with the lme4 packaged (and used on several R-Wiki pages) do not return the same results as those indicated in the help pages. For instance: > sessionInfo() R