similar to: center option of basehaz in survfit

Hello, I have a couple of questions with regards to fitting a coxph model to a data set in R: I have a very large dataset and wanted to get the baseline hazard using the basehaz() function in the package : 'survival'. If I use all the covariates then the output from basehaz(fit), where fit is a model fit using coxph(), gives 507 unique values for the time and the corresponding cumulative

I am unable to get the basehaz function to apply a proportional hazards model to a new data frame. I replicated my specific situation with the example for coxph in the help, where I changed the x value of the first record from 0 to 1. Is there something incorrect in the syntax that I am using? Thanks in advance! test1 <- list(time= c(4, 3,1,1,2,2,3), status=c(1,NA,1,0,1,1,0),

I've never seen this, and have no idea how to reproduce it. For resloution you are going to have to give me a working example of the failure. Also, per the posting guide, what is your sessionInfo()? Terry Therneau On 08/09/2012 04:11 AM, r-help-request at r-project.org wrote: > I have a couple of questions with regards to fitting a coxph model to a data > set in R: > > I have a

Hello R-users. I believe that the way basehaz (in the survival package) compute the baseline hazard function is false. I come to question this function when it gives me hazard probabilities greater than 1. Looking at the code I think I've localised the error : hazard probability is computed as : H <- -log(surv) but it seems to me that hazard probabilities is rather an instantaneous

I can think of many brute-force ways to do this outside of R, but was wondering if there was a simple/elegant solution within R instead. I have a table that looks something like the following: Factor1 Factor2 Value A 11/11/2009 5 A 11/12/2009 4 B 11/11/2009 7 B 11/13/2009 8 >From that I need to generate all permutations of Factor1 and Factor2 and force a 0 for any combination that doesn?t

Is names(model1$coef) what you're looking for? -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Cabrera [mailto:krcabrer at epm.net.co] Sent: 29 November 2002 10:36 Cc: R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] Obtaining the variable names of a glm object Hi, R users! Suppose I make a model like this:

Hello, as far as I see, R reports type I sums of squares. I'd like to get R to print out type III sums of squares. e.g. I have the following model: vardep~factor1*factor2 to get the type III sum of squares for factor1 I've tried anova(lm(vardep~factor2+factor1:factor2),lm(vardep~factor1*factor2)) but that didn't yield the desired result. Could anyone give me a hint how to proceed?

I'd like to get a long data set of minimum values from groups in another data set. The following almost does what I want. (Note, I'm using the word factor differently from it's meaning in R; bad choice of words) myframe = data.frame(factor1 = rep(1:2,each=8), factor2 = rep(c("a","b"),each=4, times=2), factor3 = rep(c("x","y"),each=2, times=4),

Full_Name: Tanya Logvinenko Version: 1.7.0 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (132.183.156.125) For unbalanced design, I ran into problem with ANOVA (aov function). The sum of squares for only for the second factor and total are computed correctly, but sum of squares for the first factor is computed incorreclty. Changing order of factors in the formula changes the ANOVA table. For the

Full_Name: Mike Ulrich Version: 2.9 OS: Mac OSX Submission from: (NULL) (69.169.178.34) The help documentation for loadings() lists more then one parameter. The function call only expects one parameter. The digits, cutoff, and sort parameters are not used in the function. ## S3 method for class 'loadings': print(x, digits = 3, cutoff = 0.1, sort = FALSE, ...) ## S3 method for class

I am attempting to replicate some of my experience from SAS in R and assume there are best methods for using a combination of summary(), subset, and which() to produce a subset of mean values by categorical or ordinal factors. within sas I would write proc means mean data=dataset; class factor1 factor2 var variable1 variable2; RUN; producing an output with means for each variable by factor

Hi All, I have a 4-dimensional data. I'm using barchart() function from lattice package. The R code and data are below - code includes one for stack=TRUE and other for stack=FALSE. I would like to present the data in another form which would be plotting Factor3 levels (P, Q, R, S) as two stacked bars (side by side). Like, for each level of Factor1 there should be two bars: first bar showing

Hello R How do I refer to you in a publication? Many Thanks Ross Maller -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch

Hi All, I have googled and tried finding if someone has ever tried producing (Grouped + Stacked) Barplot. I couldn't find one. My data needs to be reshaped, but once it is done it would be something like this: Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Value A X P 10 A X Q 20 A Y P 20 A Y Q 5 A Z P 20 A Z Q 10 B X P 20 B X Q 10 B

Dear R people, I have a couple of questions about post-doc analyses for 2 by 2 within subjects ANOVA. I conducted a psycholinguistic study that combined a 2 by 2 design and a latin square design. Specifically, I had 32 items each of which generated 4 conditions. Participants saw each of the 32 items only once: 8 in Condition A, 8 in B, 8 in C, and 8 in D. The table below serves as an example.

Dear Users, I ran factor analysis using R and SAS. However, I had different outputs from R and SAS. Why they provide different outputs? Especially, the factor loadings are different. I did real dataset(n=264), however, I had an extremely different from R and SAS. Why this things happened? Which software is correct on? Thanks in advance, - TY #R code with example data # A little

Hi everybody, I would like to compute the mean for 1 variable between the rows with the same levels. For example, with the dataset below: Factor1 Factor2 Value A X 1 A X 2 A Y 3 A Y 4 B X 5 B X 6 B Y

Hi, I have a data set with two continous variables that I want to plot MEANS (I am not intrerested in median values) on a double-y graph. I also have 2 factors. I want the factor combinations plotted in different panes. Dummy dataset: mydata <- data.frame(factor1 = factor(rep(LETTERS[1:3], each = 40)), factor2 = factor(rep(c(1:4), each = 10)), y1 =

Dear list, I have a question regarding the meaning of intercept term in a two-way anova model without interaction term. for example (let's assume there is no interaction between factor1 and factor2) : > df         val        factor1 factor2 1  48.61533       A      t1 2 171.13535       B      t1 3  65.96884       C      t1 4  63.71222       A      t2 5  80.22049       B      t2 6 

I have a data frame with two factors and want to create panel barcharts with one factor defining the panels and the other the vertical categories by which I can count the rows of data in each combination of factors. How do I do this? I have been trying to use barchart(~factor1|factor2) but it does not give the panels as I want them. The data looks like this: Factor1 Factor2 A y B