Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Scientific Notation"
2003 May 02
2
Suppressing Scientific Notation
R gurus,
Every so often(*) someone asks how to suppress scientific notation in
printing, so I thought I'd give it a shot, but I need some help.
The formatting decision is made(**) on line 286 of src/main/format.c :
if (mF <= *m) { /* IFF it needs less space : "F" (Fixpoint) format */
where mF is the number of characters for "normal" printing and *m is the number
2010 Aug 10
1
axis labels defaulting to scientific notation
The labels on the x-axis are defaulting to scientific notation no matter
how small cex.axis is. How can I override scientific notation to get the
labels to print out as specified? Here is the code (UNIT here is
0.0105):
plot(xm,yv,log="xy",ylim=c(0.1,20)/UNIT,xlim=c(0.004,20)*UNIT,xaxt="n",t
ype="n")
axis(1,
2010 Feb 02
2
Suppressing scientific notation on plot axis tick labels
Is there a better alternative to
x = c(1e7, 2e7)
x.lb = c(0,1e7,2e7)
s.lb = format(x.lb, scientific = FALSE, big.mark = ",")
barplot(x, yaxt = "n", ylab = "")
axis(side = 2, at = x.lb, labels = s.lb)
(I am sure there is a better alternative to line 2 :)).
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
2009 Dec 15
1
Supressing Scientific Notation
I'm trying to display my deciles without scientific notation, but have not found an option that will allow me to do so. According to web searches, the options(scipen=999) should remove scientific notation, but it seems not too. Does this option work with quantcut function? Is there any other option that can be used? I am using verison 2.10.0.
library(gtools)
library(gdata)
2010 Feb 02
1
[R] Suppressing scientific notation on plot axis tick labels (PR#14202)
On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote:
> Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf.
>
>> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than ???scipen??? digits
>> wider.
>
> However,
>
> options(scipen = 50)
> x = c(1e7, 2e7)
> barplot(x)
>
> still does not produce the desired result.
This is strange. I see what
2019 Mar 21
3
prettyNum digits=0 not compatible with scientific notation
R developers,
Seems I get a bad result ("%#4.0-1e" in particular) when trying to use prettyNum digits=0 with scientific notation. I tried on both my Linux box and on an online R evaluator and saw the same problem, so it's not limited to my box at least. I see the problem in both R 3.5.3 and R 3.3.2.
options(scipen=-100)
prettyNum(1, digits=0)
[1] "%#4.0-1e"
prettyNum(2,
2005 Sep 21
2
controlling usage of digits & scientific notation in R plots; postscript margins
Dear R users:
I assigned students to make some graphs and I'm having trouble answering
some questions that they have. We are all working on R 2.1 on Fedora
Core Linux 4 systems.
1. In the plot, the axis is not labeled by "numbers", but rather
scientific notation like "-2e+08" or such. We realize that means
-200,000,000. We want to beautify the plot. We would rather
2010 Sep 27
1
scientific vs. fixed notation in xyplot()
Hi I am using xyplot() to plot on the log scale by using scale=list(log=T)
argument. For example:
xyplot(1:10~1:10, scales=list(log=T))
But the axis labels are printed as scientific notation (10^0.0, etc), instead of
fixed notation. How can I change that to fixed notation?
options(scipen=4) doesn't work on xyplot()
Thanks
John
2006 Apr 28
1
displaying numbers not in scientific notation
Sorry for asking such a simple question, but I couldn't find the
answer through a search...
How can I get R to show me the values of estimates *not* in scientific notation?
When I use summary() after using lm() I am getting numbers like
4.485107e-01, when what I want to see is 0.4485....
Thanks,
Brian
2007 Jun 08
2
overplots - fixing scientific vs normal notation in output
Moving from S-plus to R I encountered many great features and a much
more stable system.
Currently, I am left with 2 problems that are handled differently:
1) I did lots of "overplots" in S-Plus using
par(new=T,xaxs='d',yaxs='d') to fix the axes
->What is the workaround in R ?
2) In S-Plus I could fix "scientific notation" or "normal notation" in
2011 Oct 14
1
is there an option to "turn off" scientific notation in write.csv
Dear Help-Rs,
I'm working with a file that contains large numbers and I need to export them "as is". for example take:
x <- c(27104010002005,27104020001805,27104090001810,90050013000140,90050013000120)
y <- c(1:5)
df <- data.frame(cbind(x,y))
When I then try a simple:
write.csv(df,file="df.csv")
I get:
x y
1 2.7104E+13 1
2 2.7104E+13 2
3 2.71041E+13 3
2019 Mar 22
2
prettyNum digits=0 not compatible with scientific notation
FWIW, it doesn't seem to be happening on Mac OS:
> format(2^30, digits=0)
[1] "1.e+09"
> prettyNum(12345.6, digits=0)
[1] "1.e+04"
A glibc misfeature?
-pd
> On 22 Mar 2019, at 10:10 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Robert for raising this here !
>
>>>>>> Robert McGehee
2010 Jun 16
1
disabling scientific number format
Hello R users,
I am a bit puzzled by the fact that
options(digits=22)
x0 <- 69880
y0 <- 26185
x1 <- 69600
y1 <- 22937
number <- paste(x0,y0,x1,y1,sep="")
number <- as.numeric(travel)
print(number)
gives number in scientific notation (some precision is wasted by having
a "e+19" at the tail):
6.988026185696e+19
but
print(exp(log(number)))
gives the
2006 Jan 24
1
No scientific notation in format
Hi
I have a data.frame with the following numbers (first column are month
numbers)
07,0,0,0,0.315444056314174,0,0,0,12.5827462764176,0.079194498691732,
0.0280828101707015,0,0.0695808222378877
08,0,0,105600,0.393061160316545,0,0,0,8.95551253153947,0.0880023174276553,
0.285714285714286,0,0.0669139911789158
09,0,0,0,0,12.5,0,0,13.5135887094281,0.0557531529154668,0,0,
0.0487526139182026
2011 Aug 25
2
rpart: plot without scientific notation
While I'm very pleased with the results I get with rpart and
rpart.plot, I would like to change the scientific notation of the
dependent variable in the plots into integers. Right now all my 5 or
more digit numbers are displayed using scientific notation.
I managed to find this:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e8/help/09/12/8423.html
but I do not fully understand what to change, and to
2003 Feb 06
1
signif {base}: changes to scientific notation
PROBLEM
`signif' does change to scientic notation
at different levels depending on the number
of significant digits in the input.
This can generate tables where figures change
``irregularly'' from normal to scientific notation.
PROPOSAL
The change to the scientific notation should
be made only if the figure in scientific notation
- with potentially as
2008 Apr 10
6
How to create a legend without plot, and to use scientific notation for axes label ?
Hi,
I have a 3 by 2 plots per page, and would like to place a legend on the last
region. How to do that ?
Also, is there any way to specify scientific notation for axes label ?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 Jan 01
4
force fixed format
Hello,
A small problem I can't solve
> p <- 0.0001
> p
[1] 1e-04
How can I force the printout of p to 0.0001?
I have tried 'format', 'round', 'signif', 'print' in different combinations without success.
Fredrik Lundgren
2002 Jul 03
2
Scientific notation
I'm writing a load of output to a file using cat(...), but I can't work out
how to turn off scientific notation for small numbers. When I originally
tried this a while a go I ended up building up a string variable, which is
rather clumsy...
Many thanks,
David
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read
2008 Apr 14
9
scientific notation problem
We''re developing a system that''s used for tracking company IPO data
and we''re running into a few number storage issues. For large numbers,
i.e. numbers greater than 100 million, MySQL insists on storing these
as scientific notation. I don''t really have a problem with that but
when we want to edit these fields using something like:
<% form_for(@company) do